A few indicators you could do to gauge the carb levels you need is with finger prick tests and the ole' bathroom scales to monitor your weight loss (or gain). The HBA1C result is but one number which is the average BSL over a period. Regularly checking your blood sugars will show if you need to reduce your carb intake or not. Unfortunately, a lot of doctors and dieticians are stuck with the low calorie/low fat mindset and may give you outdated information like: your body NEEDS carbohydrates to function and he or she might even try to get you to take statin drugs as "your cholesterol is very high". The best thing you can do for your self is to do lots and lots of reseach on Diabetes, LCHF, medications and their side effects and things that affect your health and well being. As I found out later in life, doctors do not know everythingThe Low Carb Programme tells you to discuss with your doctor how much to reduce your carbs by. Before you do it.
What I'd like to know is.... did anyone actually do that? Have you even told them about it after the fact? And given that the new NICE guidance about personal Carbohydrate recommendations appears to be largely news to most GP's, what's the chance of them coming up with a figure that is much under 150g anyway?
I just did it. (metformin only, so no hypo risk). 8 weeks later I went for annual review - at a new practice because had recently moved house. A1C was 62, but I told her I had recently reduced my carb intake and started losing weight, and asked for three months to see what I could do. I went for the follow up blood today - waiting with baited breath for the result.
I thought I read that once and quoted it but I shall read it again since I think there was second paragraph which I didn't like.Squire Fulwood - your DN might like to see the revised NICE guidance from December 2015 which talks about individualised care and a personal Carbohydrate recommendation, depending on patient's preferences...
Diabetes Australia STILL give out similar advice as NICE however the Dieticians Association have slightly altered their stance with "there are some situations where reduced carbohydrate intake may be beneficial ... " My question will always be:"if low GI foods increase your BSL slowly, would it not be better to eat foods that DON'T increase your BSL at all?"Here is the paragraph that is still in the NICE recommendations which I am hoping will be deleted one day.
"1.3.3Emphasise advice on healthy balanced eating that is applicable to the general population when providing advice to adults with type 2 diabetes. Encourage high‑fibre, low‑glycaemic‑index sources of carbohydrate in the diet, such as fruit, vegetables, wholegrains and pulses; include low‑fat dairy products and oily fish; and control the intake of foods containing saturated and trans fatty acids. [2009]"
The Dietitians Association have put their ex Deputy Director on a public black list for saying that and have taken action against Gary Fettke for improving the health of his patients in Tasmania. "Reduced carbohydrate intake" is a bit extreme for them.Diabetes Australia STILL give out similar advice as NICE however the Dieticians Association have slightly altered their stance with "there are some situations where reduced carbohydrate intake may be beneficial ... " My question will always be:"if low GI foods increase your BSL slowly, would it not be better to eat foods that DON'T increase your BSL at all?"
Here is the paragraph that is still in the NICE recommendations which I am hoping will be deleted one day.
"1.3.3Emphasise advice on healthy balanced eating that is applicable to the general population when providing advice to adults with type 2 diabetes. Encourage high‑fibre, low‑glycaemic‑index sources of carbohydrate in the diet, such as fruit, vegetables, wholegrains and pulses; include low‑fat dairy products and oily fish; and control the intake of foods containing saturated and trans fatty acids. [2009]"
It seems you can pick and mix. I like 1.1.1. and 1.3.6. but they seem to be nullified by 1.3.3. I don't think the advice is consistent and allows an HCP to choose which path to follow.Yes, but look at these two:
1.1.1 Adopt an individualised approach to diabetes care that is tailored to the needs and circumstances of adults with type 2 diabetes, taking into account their personal preferences
1.3.6 Individualise recommendations for Carbohydrate and alcohol intake and meal,patterns.
It is sad and it puts the HCP in a difficult position. Some high profile figures have been sacked/struck off for not following the standard advice. Goodness knows what would happen to a nurse if she started doing her own thing against the guidlines.Isn't it sad that some of us are scared to tell our health care team what we're doing?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?