The glycemic index (GI) ranks carbohydrate foods based on how they affect the body's blood glucose levels. "High GI" foods such as corn flakes, instant potatoes, and white bread greatly affect blood glucose levels. "Low GI" foods such as oatmeal, most fruits and vegetables, legumes, and nuts produce less of an effect. Recently, some weight loss diets have popularized the concept of the glycemic index, linking low GI foods to weight loss and high GI foods to weight gain.
The usefulness of the glycemic index in the treatment of diabetes has been controversial since its creation some 25 years ago. It's easy to understand why. The idea of classifying foods into groups -- those that greatly affect blood glucose and those that do not -- sounds very appealing to people with diabetes. It seems like it could make meal planning easier and improve after-meal blood glucose levels.
Unfortunately, it's not that simple. Here are a few reasons why.
The GI of a food varies substantially depending on the kind of food, its ripeness, the length of time it was stored, how it was cooked, its variety (potatoes from Australia, for example, have a much higher GI than potatoes from the United States), and how it was processed.
The GI of a food varies from person to person and even in a single individual from day to day, depending on blood glucose levels, insulin resistance, and other factors.
The GI of a food might be one value when it is eaten alone and another when it is eaten with other foods as part of a complete meal.
The GI value is based on a portion that contains 50 grams of carbohydrate, which is rarely the amount typically eaten.
Most GI values reflect the blood glucose response to food for only 2 hours, whereas glucose levels after eating some foods remain elevated for up to 4 hours or longer in people with diabetes.
Figuring out which foods are "high GI" and "low GI" can be complicated, too, because it depends on which base reference is used to determine the GI -- white bread or glucose. And believe it or not, many high-fat foods, such as candy bars and pizza, have a low GI. If food manufacturers begin lowering the GI of processed foods by adding high-fat ingredients or high-fructose corn syrup (which has a low GI), we'll have the same dilemma we had when low-carb products began inundating the market: junk foods that have been altered and labeled as healthy.
Some studies show small improvements in A1Cs among people who are attentive to the glycemic index. But reducing calories, weight loss, and basic carbohydrate counting have been shown to be more effective in improving A1Cs among people with type 2 diabetes than basing diet decisions on the GI.
I don't suggest eliminating "high GI" foods in favor of "low GI" foods to gain better blood glucose levels for two reasons. First, there is not enough evidence yet to show that such an action actually will improve your blood glucose levels; and second, choosing foods based solely on GI will compromise healthy eating.
I suggest basing your food choices on a nutritionally balanced diet, while controlling total carbohydrates, as a first measure. Then, if you find that your after-meal blood glucose is much higher after eating certain foods, you can either choose to eat smaller portions of those foods or adjust your mealtime diabetes medication.
Marion J. Franz, MS, RD, LD, CDE, is a nutrition/health consultant with Nutrition Concepts by Franz, Inc. For over 20 years she was the Director of Nutrition and Health Professional Education at the International Diabetes Center, Minneapolis. Her Masters Degree in Nutrition is from the University of Minnesota, and she is a Registered Dietitian (RD) and Certified Diabetes Educator (CDE). She has authored over 200 articles, books, booklets, and book chapters on diabetes, nutrition, and exercise and lectures frequently in the United States and internationally. She is an author of the American Diabetes Association 2006, 2002, 1994, and 1986 nutrition position statements and technical reviews, work group member of the American Dietetic Association Evidence-Based Nutrition Practice Guidelines for Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes 2008 and Nutritive and Non-Nutritive Sweeeteners, and was editor of the American Association of Diabetes Educators Core Curriculum for Diabetes Education, 4th and 5th edition. She has received numerous awards including the 2001 American Diabetes Association Charles H. Best Medal for Distinguished Service in the Cause of Diabetes, the 2006 American Dietetic Association Medallion Award, and the 2008 American Dietetic Association Huddleson Award.
Weight Loss Requires Drop in Calories, Not Low GI
Next Section
Question: Does a low glycemic index diet contribute to weight loss?
Answer: The quick answer to this question is “No.” Successful weight loss requires a reduced energy diet and an increase in physical activity. Nevertheless, diet books continue to suggest that high glycemic index (GI) foods trigger high insulin levels that in turn cause low blood glucose that spurs new cravings for food.
To investigate the diet books' claims, the definition of GI first must be clarified. The GI refers to the area under the 2-hour glucose curve following consumption of 50 g of digestible carbohydrate. It does not measure how rapidly blood glucose levels increase; when figures are available, you see the peak glucose response from foods or meals occurring at approximately the same times, although the peak responses may show a modest difference. Insulin responses from low versus high GI meals, when reported, are parallel. Researchers don't know if, long term, the GI of a diet can be changed. It appears that most people already eat a diet in the moderate GI range. In a 12-month study that implemented a low GI diet versus a usual GI diet, there were no differences in mean GI at the study's end.
In the first published debate on the use of GI diets for weight loss, in 2002, one researcher advised against counseling obese patients to follow a low GI diet based on a review of 20 studies (all <6 months in duration). The review found weight loss on a low GI diet in four studies—and on a high GI diet in two studies—with no differences in 14 studies. The average weight loss was 1.5 kg (3.3 lb) on the low GI diet and 1.6 kg (3.5 lb) on the high GI diet. Another research team differed with those findings, concluding from epidemiological evidence and a weight-loss study in obese adolescents that GI does play a role in weight loss and satiety. Interestingly, in two subsequent weight-loss trials in obese young adults, no difference in body weight decreases were found when implementing a low GI diet compared with other weight-loss diets.
Low GI and high GI diets for weight loss in adults have been compared in randomized clinical trials. In one 10-week study, no significant difference in weight loss occurred between the high and low GI groups. Another study compared three diets (high GI, low GI, and high fat), all with calorie levels 500 kcal less than each subject's estimated energy needs. At 12 weeks, changes in weight loss and improved insulin sensitivity were significant in all groups, but no differences between and among the groups were found. All groups maintained their weight loss and improved insulin sensitivity independent of diet composition.
More recently, an eloquently designed 1-year trial compared the effects of two energy-restricted diets differing in GI. All food for the two diets (40% carbohydrate from low GI foods compared with 60% energy intake from high GI foods) was provided to the subjects for the first 6 months. During the next 24 weeks subjects took responsibility for food preparation and continued their assigned diet. Both groups attended weekly behavioral support sessions. No significant differences between groups were found in weight or body fat loss, mean energy intake, hunger, satiety, and metabolic rate for ≤12 months. The investigators concluded that their findings provide more rigorous support that wide variability in the balance of dietary macronutrients and glycemic GI has little effect on long-term weight loss during calorie restriction. They noted a tendency for weight and body fat regain in the low GI group, which suggests “that reduced energy intake may be somewhat harder to sustain with low GI regimens long term.”
Finally, it should be noted that the GI is not necessarily the best indicator of healthy food choices. Soft drinks, candy bars, and premium ice creams have low to moderate GIs. The GI of foods can be lowered by adding fat or adding or substituting sugars, especially fructose and sugar alcohols. Even University of Toronto nutrition professor Thomas Wolever, MD, PhD, one of the originators of the GI concept, has noted, “Whole-wheat bread, brown rice, and brown spaghetti all have the same GI values as their `refined' white versions.”
The bottom line is that calories count! Energy restriction and an increase in energy expenditure should continue to be the focus of weight loss and maintenance intervention efforts. Health professionals and the public know this, but they still want an easier answer.
The effect of a low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet versus a low-glycemic index diet on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Abstract
Objective
Dietary carbohydrate is the major determinant of postprandial glucose levels, and several clinical studies have shown that low-carbohydrate diets improve glycemic control. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that a diet lower in carbohydrate would lead to greater improvement in glycemic control over a 24-week period in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Research design and methods
Eighty-four community volunteers with obesity and type 2 diabetes were randomized to either a low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet (<20 g of carbohydrate daily; LCKD) or a low-glycemic, reduced-calorie diet (500 kcal/day deficit from weight maintenance diet; LGID). Both groups received group meetings, nutritional supplementation, and an exercise recommendation. The main outcome was glycemic control, measured by hemoglobin A1c.
Results
Forty-nine (58.3%) participants completed the study. Both interventions led to improvements in hemoglobin A1c, fasting glucose, fasting insulin, and weight loss. The LCKD group had greater improvements in hemoglobin A1c (-1.5% vs. -0.5%, p = 0.03), body weight (-11.1 kg vs. -6.9 kg, p = 0.008), and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (+5.6 mg/dL vs. 0 mg/dL, p < 0.001) compared to the LGID group. Diabetes medications were reduced or eliminated in 95.2% of LCKD vs. 62% of LGID participants (p < 0.01).
Conclusion
Dietary modification led to improvements in glycemic control and medication reduction/elimination in motivated volunteers with type 2 diabetes. The diet lower in carbohydrate led to greater improvements in glycemic control, and more frequent medication reduction/elimination than the low glycemic index diet. Lifestyle modification using low carbohydrate interventions is effective for improving and reversing type 2 diabetes.
jopar said:Can you supply the links to the research etc you've been posting... So we can read it all?
ADA Bottom Line: At this time, research does not support the claim that a low GI diet causes significant weight loss or helps control appetite. For people with diabetes, monitoring total grams of carbohydrate remains the key strategy. However, some individuals with diabetes may be able to use the GI concept, along with blood glucose monitoring, to “fine-tune” their food choices to produce a modest improvement in postmeal blood glucose level.
xyzzy said:Some more GI related stuff this time relating to weight loss.
This one is a study done in 2007 by Marion J. Franz, MS, RD, LD, CDE.
Weight Loss Requires Drop in Calories, Not Low GI
Next Section
Question: Does a low glycemic index diet contribute to weight loss?
Answer: The quick answer to this question is “No.” Successful weight loss requires a reduced energy diet and an increase in physical activity. Nevertheless, diet books continue to suggest that high glycemic index (GI) foods trigger high insulin levels that in turn cause low blood glucose that spurs new cravings for food.
There is a lack of consensus as to the best nutritional management of obesity. We assessed the effects of low glycaemic index or glycaemic load diets in overweight or obese people. Six randomised controlled trials, involving 202 participants, were analysed. Interventions ranged from five weeks to six months duration. Participants receiving the low glycaemic index or load diet lost a mean of one kilogramme more than those on comparison diets. Lipid profile also improved more in participants receiving the low glycaemic index or load diet. No study reported adverse effects, mortality or quality of life data.
borofergie said:I see your "dietician" and raise you the Cochrane Review:
http://summaries.cochrane.org/CD005105/ ... nd-obesity
phoenix said:I could trade studies: (snap Stephen)
I suggest basing your food choices on a nutritionally balanced diet, while controlling total carbohydrates, as a first measure. Then, if you find that your after-meal blood glucose is much higher after eating certain foods, you can either choose to eat smaller portions of those foods or adjust your mealtime diabetes medication.
Sid Bonkers said:Surely the whole point of a GI/GL diet is that because lower GI foods cause less of a peak in bg then when eating to your meter you will see a significant improvement in bg levels eating a low or lower GI diet.
Not really sure what it is you are trying to argue xzzxy as lower GI foods can only help you eat to your meter by the very fact that they will help keep bg levels on a more even keel and not cause the big spikes and higher levels associated with higher GI foods.
Carb reduction and low GI go hand in hand, they can only compliment each other
I don't suggest eliminating "high GI" foods in favor of "low GI" foods to gain better blood glucose levels for two reasons. First, there is not enough evidence yet to show that such an action actually will improve your blood glucose levels; and second, choosing foods based solely on GI will compromise healthy eating.
xyzzy said:There is nothing in what you've written I particularly disagree with. I personally think that the good doctor Freeman's statement...
I don't suggest eliminating "high GI" foods in favor of "low GI" foods to gain better blood glucose levels for two reasons. First, there is not enough evidence yet to show that such an action actually will improve your blood glucose levels; and second, choosing foods based solely on GI will compromise healthy eating.
...is a too extreme viewpoint
Sid Bonkers said:xyzzy said:There is nothing in what you've written I particularly disagree with. I personally think that the good doctor Freeman's statement...
I don't suggest eliminating "high GI" foods in favor of "low GI" foods to gain better blood glucose levels for two reasons. First, there is not enough evidence yet to show that such an action actually will improve your blood glucose levels; and second, choosing foods based solely on GI will compromise healthy eating.
...is a too extreme viewpoint
The good doctor of whom I have no knowledge whatsoever is IMO totally wrong in his conclusions, you only have to look at how many forum members here are able to eat Burgen (Lo GI) soya & linseed bread when they cant touch any other bread without spiking badly to know that GI works.
I rest my case your honour
xyzzy said:Aha but there we have it Sid. You eat Burgen cos its Lo GI. I eat Burgen cos its Lo Carb. Both views are applicable wouldn't you say? What matters is not one piece of Burgen but what happens overall.
xyzzy said:The difference is if a UK dietician were giving us that eat Burgen advice they would go on to say "and eat a diet of similar starchy carbs with every meal and don't stop until 33% of what you've eaten is starchy and your total carbs amount to 50% of your daily intake".
xyzzy said:A Swedish dietician recommending their moderate carb reduced system would say "Eat the Burgen in moderation but also try and eat a diet rich in [list of foods] and restrict other starchy carbs so that your total carbs amount to 30%".
http://www.diabetes.org.uk/nutrition-guidelinesRecommendations
• Weight management should be the primary nutritional strategy in managing
glucose control in Type 2 diabetes for people who are overweight or obese. (A)
• Regular, moderate physical activity can reduce HbA1c by 0.45 – 0.65 per cent
independent of weight loss. (A)
• Focus should be on total energy intake rather than the source of energy in the diet
(macronutrient composition) for optimal glycaemic control. (A)
• The total amount of carbohydrate consumed is a strong predictor of glycaemic
response and monitoring total carbohydrate intake whether by use of exchanges,
portions or experience-based estimation, remains a key strategy in achieving
glycaemic control. (A)
• Low GI diets may redcue HbA1c up to 0.5 per cent . (A)
http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/34/Supplement_1/S11.fullIn overweight and obese insulin-resistant individuals, modest weight loss has been shown to reduce insulin resistance. Thus, weight loss is recommended for all overweight or obese individuals who have or are at risk for diabetes. (A)
For weight loss, either low-carbohydrate, low-fat calorie-restricted, or Mediterranean diets may be effective in the short-term (up to 2 years). (A)
For patients on low-carbohydrate diets, monitor lipid profiles, renal function, and protein intake (in those with nephropathy), and adjust hypoglycemic therapy as needed. (E)
Physical activity and behavior modification are important components of weight loss programs and are most helpful in maintenance of weight loss. (B
The best mix of carbohydrate, protein, and fat may be adjusted to meet the metabolic goals and individual preferences of the person with diabetes. (E)
Monitoring carbohydrate, whether by carbohydrate counting, choices, or experience-based estimation, remains a key strategy in achieving glycemic control. (A)
For individuals with diabetes, the use of the glycemic index and glycemic load may provide a modest additional benefit for glycemic control over that observed when total carbohydrate is considered alone. (B)
Saturated fat intake should be <7% of total calories. (A)
Reducing intake of trans fat lowers LDL cholesterol and increases HDL cholesterol (A), therefore intake of trans fat should be minimized. (E)
Other nutrition recommendations
If adults with diabetes choose to use alcohol, daily intake should be limited to a moderate amount (one drink per day or less for adult women and two drinks per day or less for adult men). (E)
Routine supplementation with antioxidants, such as vitamins E and C and carotene, is not advised because of lack of evidence of efficacy and concern related to long-term safety. (A)
Individualized meal planning should include optimization of food choices to meet recommended dietary allowance (RDA)/dietary reference intake (DRI) for all micronutrients. (E)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?