Congratulation on your success with your FBG and weight loss!Part 9 - Caloric restriction vs fasting now posted:
https://intensivedietarymanagement.com/caloric-reduction-vs-fasting-part-9/
An update on my fasting experiment: I've been doing the 16hr per day intermittent fasting regime for just over 100 days now and finally seeing results. After watching Dr Fung's Capetown lecture, I guess I've finally achieved the above 30% liver fat loss that restores normal fasting BG. I'm under 5.5 most days and have even had a couple of 4.8/4.9s. Going by the same lecture, I still haven't achieved the restoration of beta cell function caused by de-fatting the pancreas that he says takes longer because I'm still spiking above 7.8 after even very low carb meals.
Over this time my BMI has dropped from 25.4 to 22.8 with weight loss of 7kgs. As of the weekend, my waist measurement is finally 80cm.
I'm going to persist with this regime till I reach 120 days and will reassess. The weight loss now is very slow, yet following the regime is not onerous, so I think I can sustain it until I hopefully de-fat the pancreas.
All in all, very happy with the results - I never honestly thought I'd get normal fasting levels so it's great to be proved wrong
Congratulation on your success with your FBG and weight loss!
Do you have a link to the Capetown lecture, or is it part of the LCHF Convention that has to be paid for? I'd like to read more about the topic of liver and pancreas, as it seems that I am the opposite of you: my post-prandial BG is well controlled by LCHF, under 7 and less than a 2 point rise, whilst my FBG is still consistently higher than normal.
Forgot to say, my postprandial levels seem to have actually worsened somewhat since starting this regime. Your levels seem similar to mine prior to starting the fasting. The same meals that would normally not be problematic are sending me higher and taking longer to return to baseline. I'm hoping that too will normalise if I keep persisting.Congratulation on your success with your FBG and weight loss!
Do you have a link to the Capetown lecture, or is it part of the LCHF Convention that has to be paid for? I'd like to read more about the topic of liver and pancreas, as it seems that I am the opposite of you: my post-prandial BG is well controlled by LCHF, under 7 and less than a 2 point rise, whilst my FBG is still consistently higher than normal.
Many thanks for this, I will watch them as soon as possible. His website is so rich in content that I'm finding it hard to orient myself!He gave 2 lectures as part of the LCHF Convention, but they are updated versions of the Youtube lectures Type 2 Aetiology & Reversabillity and Insulin Toxicity. His free Youtube lectures are here: https://www.youtube.com/user/drjasonfung/videos
My personal take on this - there is a "myth" in Paleo circles (including Dave Asprey's brand) that goes back to the Paleo for Women blogpost on fasting that Dr Fung links to and pretty much refutes. Kiefer of 'Carb Nite' fame says that when you're talking about diabetics, you're talking about a whole different ballgame to normal metabolism, but it's an issue glossed over by most Paleos as they tend to be writing to a non-diabetic audience.@Indy51, great numbers! I haven't yet had the chance to read the Fung article on women and fasting, but I've recently looked into the Bulletproof diet and there are some recommendations for women that I'm thinking of trying. The one I've already adopted is intermittent fat fasting, with breakfast replaced by a butter&coconut oil coffee (at the moment I'm not doing it every day) rather than completely cut out. Another recommendation, and I'm not sure how it would work with diabetes, is to perform occasional carb refeeds, as apparently strict LC can have a negative effect on the functioning of the adrenal glands which, amongst other things, slows down/blocks fat loss. I'm still trying to research more about it before I decide whether to try it, and I hope that Dr Fung will help. Thanks for posting!
My personal take on this - there is a "myth" in Paleo circles (including Dave Asprey's brand) that goes back to the Paleo for Women blogpost on fasting that Dr Fung links to and pretty much refutes. Kiefer of 'Carb Nite' fame says that when you're talking about diabetics, you're talking about a whole different ballgame to normal metabolism, but it's an issue glossed over by most Paleos as they tend to be writing to a non-diabetic audience.
I think the main thing for women to be concerned about is stress - if you're already stressed, adding fasting to the equation is probably not a very smart move. Stress is what causes problems for both adrenal and sex hormones. Despite being a fan of a lot of Paleo writers, I always have to keep in mind that diabetes trumps everything else.
I've been following a LCHF/Primal WOE for over 3 years. I doubt I've ever had a "carb re-feed" in those 3 years - I doubt if even when I've had cake or other rare treats that I've exceeded 100g carbs on any day during that time. Despite that, I just seem to get healthier, so I'm not giving too much credence to Paleo - especially the Crossfit/exercise fanatic end of the spectrum and their 'safe starches' obsession. TBH, I'm more interested in what my own body (and my glucometer) is telling me than what some "guru" has to say.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?