OK Thanks.It's showing as post 23 for me.
A shame the supporting slides were only flashed up briefly. Do PHCUK offer a slide package on its own?Done it.
Very good.
I saw this lady interviewing Prof Panda earlier in the month, she is a very impressive clear communicator
Sent from my iPhone using DCUK Forum
A shame the supporting slides were only flashed up briefly. Do PHCUK offer a slide package on its own?
The message is loud and clear. and most of it has already been aired in this Forum but it is nice to have it all in one easily understood package.
Well worth taking the time to view this. Thank you.
If you have a reasonable screen size you could always pause the YouTube video ( its on YouTube) and photograph the screen with a digital camera. D.You could contact Trudi directly and ask her for them?
The only digital camera I have is built into the screen of my laptop for selfies only. Good idea, but impractical.If you have a reasonable screen size you could always pause the YouTube video ( its on YouTube) and photograph the screen with a digital camera. D.
I now have a reply from PHCUK, and I also have their written permission to share the link on this forumYou could contact Trudi directly and ask her for them?
I now have a reply from PHCUK, and I also have their written permission to share the link on this forum
Here it be:
https://www.PHCuk.org/wp-content/up...ines-In-Relation-To-Dietary-Saturated-Fat.pdf
Not sure I agree with some of his conclusions, especially those in the last section Further Problems. He demonises sugar worse than Richard Feinman is doing in USA at the moment (or Robert Lustig for that). I know Adreneline is the fight/flight hormone, and that hypo's can trigger it to give liver dump, but I think his explanation extrapolates it further than that. Maybe he feels IR is actually due to adreneline from sugar, but no one else seems to draw that conclusion.Chapter 6: "The Sugar Fat Connection"
........>
MORE PROBLEMS:
SAFs decrease oxygen to our tissues (hypoxia) choking them by making red blood cells stick together (glication of platelets). Refined sugars can cause significant tissue hypoxia.
Sugars inhibit functions of immune system and increase diseases cause by poor immune function such as colds and flu etc.
Sugars also support development of food allergies including asthma, colitis, joint pain, muscle pain
Sugars increase body's production of adrenaline by 4 times, putting us in permanent state of fight or flight. This stress reaction increase production of cholesterol and cortisone.
Sugars thus play a big role in causing fatty degeneration and degenerative diseases by contributing to the fat and cholesterol our body must carry; by depleting our body's stores of vitamins and minerals; by interfering with essential fatty acid, adrenal gland, and immune system functions; and by their lack of bulk and fiber.
An interesting chapter
Not sure I agree with some of his conclusions, especially those in the last section Further Problems. He demonises sugar worse than Richard Feinman is doing in USA at the moment (or Robert Lustig for that). I know Adreneline is the fight/flight hormone, and that hypo's can trigger it to give liver dump, but I think his explanation extrapolates it further than that. Maybe he feels IR is actually due to adreneline from sugar, but no one else seems to draw that conclusion.
Would be interesting to compare it to the current edition to see if he has changed his ideas in this chapter. I mean, Bernstein has owned up to changing his mind, and Atkins did too. Better we get closer to the truth than hide behind an ego, eh? Few Guru's have been shown to be infallible. I think he did well for 23 years ago.Thanks for feedback @Oldvatr, could be down to 23 years old second edition and being out in the edge back then and perhaps a little extreme with his conclusions today.
It was great to see a chapter on sugar in a book focused on Fat...of course I get his link.
Sent from my iPhone using DCUK Forum
Would be interesting to compare it to the current edition to see if he has changed his ideas in this chapter. I mean, Bernstein has owned up to changing his mind, and Atkins did too. Better we get closer to the truth than hide behind an ego, eh? Few Guru's have been shown to be infallible. I think he did well for 23 years ago.
Sorry, I misread the website. Thought it said 10th edition, but it actually said 10th printing.The sad thing is this was his last edition, so perhaps most of those 200,000 in print are still boxed up in his garage
Sent from my iPhone using DCUK Forum
Where did you get this idea? I've read his book, watched interviews and read blogposts where Dr Feinman disagrees mightily with Lustig's stance on fructose. My impression was that Feinman believes all carbs are the issue, not that sugar is particularly toxic.demonises sugar worse than Richard Feinman is doing in USA
It was a rebuttal he made on the ADA nutrition guidelines where he strongly disagreed with their statementWhere did you get this idea? I've read his book, watched interviews and read blogposts where Dr Feinman disagrees mightily with Lustig's stance on fructose. My impression was that Feinman believes all carbs are the issue, not that sugar is particularly toxic.
Did he mention that UFA's are weaker due to double bond, and hence more prone to oxidation damage? This is where plaque is purported to come from. But SFA's are much more stable.Chapter 7: Liquid Oils & UNsaturated Fatty Acids
The author kicks off by saying the fats that heal contain UnSAT Fat Acids (UFAs) which makes them liquid oils. UFAs differ from DAFAs in only one respect, namely they contain one or more double bonds between carbon atoms in their fatty carbon chain. And for each double bond they have upto 2 hydrogen atoms. Aside from this they are identical
Like SAFs they have a methyl end and an acid end and carbon chains of varying lengths.
Properties of the Double Bonds:
The small difference in structure (double bond) DRASTICALLY changes an UFAs properties.
SAFAs and Trans-fatty acids look like straight bodied caterpillars, UFAs look like bent caterpillars. This so called Cis-configuration and kink in the molecule makes them difficult to align and this UFAs aggregate poorly and melt at low temps (are more liquid) than SAFAs.
Sent from my iPhone using DCUK Forum
Did he mention that UFA's are weaker due to double bond, and hence more prone to oxidation damage? This is where plaque is purported to come from. But SFA's are much more stable.
PS whats a DAFA? A SAFA in mufti?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?