I normally test with a Glucomen Visio, but have compared readings from the same finger punture on a Glucomen GM today to see what reading it gave.
The Visio showed 6.5 and the GM showed 7.4
That is rather a large spread of readings from a single puncture! Both meters kept at room temperature.
I note from the instructions that a test solution can be used to verify the accuracy of the meter but it is considered OK if the reading from the test solution is in the range 4.7 to 6.4 which I would not regard as particularly accurate.
If this spread of readings is representative of the generally low accuracy of home testing meters then it's difficult to be sure if your fasting readings are good or not - after all, they too might be inaccurate by up to 1.4 mmol.
Has there been any quantitative testing of the various meters on the market to establish if one make is consistently more accurate than the others?
Ed
The Visio showed 6.5 and the GM showed 7.4
That is rather a large spread of readings from a single puncture! Both meters kept at room temperature.
I note from the instructions that a test solution can be used to verify the accuracy of the meter but it is considered OK if the reading from the test solution is in the range 4.7 to 6.4 which I would not regard as particularly accurate.
If this spread of readings is representative of the generally low accuracy of home testing meters then it's difficult to be sure if your fasting readings are good or not - after all, they too might be inaccurate by up to 1.4 mmol.
Has there been any quantitative testing of the various meters on the market to establish if one make is consistently more accurate than the others?
Ed