Well you could give yourself a slap on the wrist rather than a kicking..
But it completely depends on how you view your health and the lengths to which you want to go to preserve it for as long as possible. You're still quite young so should have a far more flexible metabolism than an old f**t like me.
But you know it was most likely the polenta so why not just not eat that next time and eat the stuffed cabbage leaves?
Alright then. I'm an all-or-nothing type myself, so I do get it. If that's what you need, okay. (But I still hope you enjoyed the heck out of that meal.)
Same here, in fact given how much time I've spent over 8.5 (going on average readings calculated from my HbA1cs - the word 'decades' explains it fairly well), I think I should be dead by now, but I'm not, I'm still here (being a complete pessimist most of the time, but still here)I am obviously a terrible example but if an 8 is very bad, I am bang in trouble, I'm quite pleased when I get an 8
I have been known to run up and down our staircase over and over to bring a number down too. Can't always get out of the house for a walk with 3 little kids so I understand that you do what you have to.
It's a spike at 2 hours rather than 1 hour though. And I'm not officially diagnosed with diabetes but had gestational diabetes and may have glucose intolerance according to a 1h spike to 12.1 during my last GTT. But even then my 2 hour had come back down to 6.5mmol. So 8 mmol at 2 hours does concern me a bit... but then again, the metre probably isn't all that reliable and I may have spent longer eating than I would have in GTT so it's probably normal for the amount I ate maybe... normal slightly carb intolerant maybe.Correct me if I am wrong, but a spike of 8.0 isn't bad I'd be more concerned if your BG continued climbing and never came back down or took too long to come back down and you did come back down nicely. Its damaging when your BG stays high and continue being high.
Same here, in fact given how much time I've spent over 8.5 (going on average readings calculated from my HbA1cs - the word 'decades' explains it fairly well), I think I should be dead by now, but I'm not, I'm still here (being a complete pessimist most of the time, but still here)
But yeah one test over 8.5 is really nothing to worry about.
Luckily not much - there have been signs of background retinopathy are now signs of maculopathy - so I have to get my eyes checked every 6 months (rather than yearly), but nothing else needs to be done apart from that currently. But note: I think I have been very very lucky to not really have anything majorly wrong yetHave you experienced any complications if your levels are over that for decades???
Luckily not much - there have been signs of background retinopathy are now signs of maculopathy - so I have to get my eyes checked every 6 months (rather than yearly), but nothing else needs to be done apart from that currently. But note: I think I have been very very lucky to not really have anything majorly wrong yet
Noting that I'm T1, and for me it's always been a bit of a bad juggling act to try and 'control' it
But yeah one reading of 8.5 really is nothing to worry about
Edit: added the word bad
All the tissues and organs of the body have their nutrients brought to them by the blood, so if the blood glucose is high, the level of glucose in the tissues is also high. That’s why diabetics of all types are able to use glucose sensors such as Libre and Dexcom, because they measure the glucose in interstitial fluid, the fluid that bathes the cells. Glucose isn’t confined to blood contained within blood vessels. That’s why badly controlled type ones are just at risk of complications as diabetics of any other type.It's perhaps worth considering that, generally speaking, T1 autoimmune diabetics are only affected by their blood glucose, whereas T2 resistant diabetics must also consider all-body glucose backed up in their eyes, tissues and organs. It's not really the same ballpark. Glucotoxicity in the blood is not the same game as glucotoxicuty in the blood and everywhere else.
I would always recommend caution when comparing one's own diabetes metrics with those of others. Even HbA1c can vary between individuals who might otherwise have identical average blood glucose concentrations, simply because the test assumes an arbitrary red blood cell lifespan, which is not a constant in everyone. There are other factors, too, but not worth overcomplicating things here.
No I'm not saying that at all. It's my strategy, but it doesn't have to be yours. It's not really possible to determine any level of damage caused by an isolated blood glucose rise, since elevated blood glucose is merely a symptom of hyperinsulinemia and all-body glucose. Neither of which can be readily measured.
I look to my entire lifestyle to gauge my metabolic health and likelihood of complications, rather than what my meter tells me is in my blood. Blood glucose is only one part of the extremely complex subject of metabolic syndrome. In summary if you are happy with your overall management then don't stress over individual numbers on a glucometer.
All the tissues and organs of the body have their nutrients brought to them by the blood, so if the blood glucose is high, the level of glucose in the tissues is also high. That’s why diabetics of all types are able to use glucose sensors such as Libre and Dexcom, because they measure the glucose in interstitial fluid, the fluid that bathes the cells. Glucose isn’t confined to blood contained within blood vessels. That’s why badly controlled type ones are just at risk of complications as diabetics of any other type.
All the tissues and organs of the body have their nutrients brought to them by the blood, so if the blood glucose is high, the level of glucose in the tissues is also high. That’s why diabetics of all types are able to use glucose sensors such as Libre and Dexcom, because they measure the glucose in interstitial fluid, the fluid that bathes the cells. Glucose isn’t confined to blood contained within blood vessels. That’s why badly controlled type ones are just at risk of complications as diabetics of any other type.
It's a spike at 2 hours rather than 1 hour though. And I'm not officially diagnosed with diabetes but had gestational diabetes and may have glucose intolerance according to a 1h spike to 12.1 during my last GTT. But even then my 2 hour had come back down to 6.5mmol. So 8 mmol at 2 hours does concern me a bit... but then again, the metre probably isn't all that reliable and I may have spent longer eating than I would have in GTT so it's probably normal for the amount I ate maybe... normal slightly carb intolerant maybe.
One thing to look at would be how much did the meal effect your glucose control over the next day or several days.
If there is little effect, then the one-off meal that results in a reading just over 7.8 shouldn’t be that much of a concern. You can always plan some exercise to bring the blood sugar back into the 5s more quickly - maybe even by two hours.
If it has a negative effect on the following day(s) fasting and post-prandial numbers then consider that the effect is then more than the hours after the one meal.
4My comments would be:
A one off reading of 8+ for a T2 or pre-diabetic is no cause for any alarm whatsoever, for most of the reasons mentioned above.
However, PLEASE do not compare yourself with T1 blood glucose management and levels.
T2s still have functioning beta cells that produce insulin. EMost T1s do not have functioning beta cells (or have so few that they need the insulin to supplement what insulin production they have left).
One of the goals for most T2s is to preserve beta cell function, and that means keeping blood glucose low enough that the high glucose levels doesn’t kill the beta cells. See www.bloodsugar101.com for references to studies showing that the extent and duration that blood glucose is above (I think) 7.8mmol/l is directly linked to the number of beta cells that die from glucose ‘poisoning’.
Obviously, this is not a concern for T1s once they have gone through their honeymoon period.
So while I am delighted that T1s can endure greater bg fluctuations and avoid diabetic complications, the same levels will not help a T2 to preserve their failing beta cells or keep their insulin resistance down.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?