Er, that was exactly the point the quiz was making. "How" as in what methodology, what health evidence base. (Answer: none). Not what quango did the paperwork.Ah now come one - the quiz was not concerning the point you were trying to make so nil points is harsh. We are both diabetics so the political scoring evident in the Eurovision Song Contest should be replicated here.
Scardoc, why do you think in the entire population of diabetics, HBa1c worsens over time, regardless of tight control - testing and commitment? This is one of the most salient evidence points in the whole of diabetes management (equal in significance to "Hba1c correlates to complications", which we now take for granted).
Why is this? What is the reason? Cue deafening silence from the HCPs.
Under your hypothesis, the conclusion would be that the longer we have diabetes, the *less* committed and compliant we get. As complications arise and Hba1c deteriorates, we all take our foot off the gas and our eyes off the ball. How plausible is that?
An objective person looking in on diabetes HCPs from the outside would look at that very salient data and draw the much more reasonable inference that *the methods used are not working*.
But the HCPs behave like politicians, not scientists, and continue to blame the patients for "non-compliance" as the only explanation.
Absolutely disagree with the point about exercise. Insulin resistance is lowered considerably by exercise and I think it has an equal part in my management. My hospital has a picture of a 3 legged stool on the wall of the 'education room' the three legs, insulin, diet and exercise.I said most points were marginal. Exercise is marginal for a T1, as is compliance with the NHS diet - marginal to negative. Testing and commitment are critical, I agree.
It is natural for your Hba1c to increase.
The HCPs who as a profession described low carb as "dangerous", refused to support us in it, forced it underground, out of contact with HCP support, on *literally no evidence base*? Those HCPs? The same ones who are now collectively retracting this dogma they foisted on us for 50 years (while not quite going so far as saying they were wrong, of course).And yet again you return to blaming the HCP because they clearly are all as ignorant and stupid as portrayed by you.
Yes, and a thing of wondrous beauty DD! xxx. ;-)My hba1c has stayed the same 5-6 for 30 years... Am I medical wonder?
No it isn't.
Scardoc you are retreating to a "straw man" argument if all [you're] defending is that low carb is not the 100% solution and cure for everything.
But still you have no evidence base for your claim that the NHS carb diet is not responsible for the 94% off-target diabetics. Who knows, it might be. You don't know. No one does. So you are in no position to claim, as you did, it was "certain" not to be the case.
Personally I would be unsurprised if the NHS diet/dose regime for diabetics was responsible for well above 50% of the off-target diabetics.
Gosh, I've not checked in for a day or so and it's all kicked off!
Seriously though, thank you for every single reply - I think we can all agree we are very passionate about out diabetes and controlling it. I think it's all about finding what works for you and appreciating that it might not work for everyone.
. It is natural for humans to slow down and increase in weight as they get older.
.
@Scardoc you made the "certain" claim, not me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?