I would suggest that this ties in with the Metformin helping cells utilize the insulin where Insulin Resistance is present which is most evident if the 'fasting' glucose levels are highI read a paper once that said that metformin works better for people with a high fasting (i.e. first thing in the morning) blood glucose level than for people with only high post-meal blood glucose levels.
Yes, I think that it helps tell the liver to stop producing so much glucose when it doesn't need to.I would suggest that this ties in with the Metformin helping cells utilize the insulin where Insulin Resistance is present which is most evident if the 'fasting' glucose levels are high
but as I read it it seems metformin only lowers blood glucose like something in between 0.6% and 2.0% and in my eyes that is yes ridiculously little... like if one had a raise of blood glucose of 100mmol it would only lower the number by 2.0% and that would leave the person with a number of at least 98mmol then...
Hi @Freema, I think you may be interpreting the results wrong here...
I'm pretty sure the percentage reference is with respect to the old fashioned HbA1c DCCT units of measurement. So a reduction of 2% is actually huge.
5% (31mmol/mol) = Avg BG 5.4mmol/l; non diabetic
7% (53mmol/mol) = Avg BG 8.5mmol/l; diabetic.
That's how I'm interpreting the results anyway; I could be wrong...
Yes I have heard that but in this world of evidence based information I would like to hear what that benefit is exactly. If I am to get an unspecified benefit when I am 110 years old you may lose my attention.It does have other benefits though, or so I have been told so if you can tolerate it it may be best to continue with it.
IIt doesn't do anything at all as regards reducing post meal spikes.
Metformin is also supposed to protect the heart as those with diabetes are more at risk of having heart problems. My doctor thinks it is worth taking it for that
From the first link you provided:2% that is of a number of 6.0mmol only about 0.12 mmol i think that is hardly anything....
if one has an average blood glucose of HbA1c 50 (IFFC) then the reduction is 1.0 and the result would be an HbA1c of 49 then...
would you count that in another way ?
oh in that way it is a lot more... than I understood..From the first link you provided:
"The corresponding between-group differences in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ranged from 0.6% to 2.0% at dosages of 500 to 2000 mg daily, respectively."
HbA1c used to be expressed as a percentage, and I think in this example is with reference to the DCCT units of measurement.
So a 2% reduction in HbA1c is (for example) 7% to 5% or 53mmol/mol to 31mmol/mol.
From the above example, a 2% decrease in HbA1c (measured in old DCCT standards) equates to a reduction of 22mmol/mol (measured in IFCC new standards).
One thing it does do is suppress apatite and in that my doctor agrees though when I said about protecting the heart and nervous system as possibilities I had heard mentioned he did laugh to my chagrin but then what does he know he wants me to take statins that's when I laughed.
That's how I'm reading it @Freema; but I may be completely wrong
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?