• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

how much should blood glucose levels vary?

R

randomwoman

Member
Messages
5
I'm newly diagnosed, posted my intro thread last week.

I am still waiting for my first clinic appointment, which is on 17th and meanwhile I'm finding the amount of contradictory info available online is really not helping my anxiety. I've not been told to start testing my blood glucose levels but I bought a kit anyway because at first I found that checking them helped calm the anxiety.

And it's been fairly helpful - I think I've stopped convincing myself that every time my foot tingles, it's going to end in amputation.

But I don't really know much about interpreting the results. Plenty of websites say what the healthy range is, but how much are they supposed to vary within a given day?

(everytime I test, it comes up with a number between 5.0 and 7.0 - I'm not worried that they're massively high or massively low, I just don't know how much they're supposed to vary for a given person on a given day. And I'm slightly worried that they're usually between 5.9 and 6.2 after a meal but today they're 7.0 despite the fact that I've eaten the same meal I've eaten every other day this week)

Sorry if I'm being ridiculous, I'm given to paranoia at the best of times.
 
If you can limit your glucose rise to 2mmol around 2hrs after eating then you're doing amazingly well. (Tell us how you do it).

Don't get worried about individual readings or even 1 day's readings unless they are massively off from what you expect. Meters are not the most accurate devices, they have a variance of up to 15% either way and there are many variables with finger prick tests anyway, so look for trends and repeatability.
 
We mostly all would agree with testing. The whole anxiety argument is one I’ve gotten from my gp but I’m more anxious not knowing what’s going on. It’s fundamentally about cost and various excuses used to avoid admitting that.

Test on getting up. That may be higher than you hope due to dawn phenomenon. (You liver “helping” you get up with a morning shot of glucose. Otherwise test before eating and 2 hrs after. (Some people also test at 3hrs in case of slow digestion or slow rise). That should give you a better idea of which foods work for you and which don’t. You’re looking for no more than 2mmol rise between them. I tend to get lower readings as the day goes on.

Dehydration, stress, illness, lack of sleep, medications can all affect the readings too. As can food combinations. Eg eating fat with a carb helps slow down the rise.

Which foods to choose? Well you may or may not get the standard balanced diet/ eatwell plate / eat starchy carbs rubbish from your appointment. We as diabetics struggle with carbs. Therefore, to me at least, it makes a huge amount of sense not to eat many of them. Read labels for carbs not just sugar. Dietdoctor.com and ditchthecarbs.com both helped me a lot with food ideas. There are lots of others too. How far to take it depends how much change you’re willing/able to make.
 
urbanracer said:
If you can limit your glucose rise to 2mmol around 2hrs after eating then you're doing amazingly well. (Tell us how you do it).

Don't get worried about individual readings or even 1 day's readings unless they are massively off from what you expect. Meters are not the most accurate devices, they have a variance of up to 15% either way and there are many variables with finger prick tests anyway, so look for trends and repeatability.
Click to expand...

Thanks, this is helpful. I'm guessing from your first sentence that "massively off" means something outside the standard NICE-defined levels then?
 
randomwoman said:
Thanks, this is helpful. I'm guessing from your first sentence that "massively off" means something outside the standard NICE-defined levels then?
Click to expand...
If something raises me by 3, 5 or even 10 mmol I wouldn’t eat it again! Make sure your finger was clean though and take note of other factors eg stress sleep depravation, illness etc
 
randomwoman said:
Just to clarify (sorry I'm new to all this), we're talking in whole numbers here right? 3.0 rather than 0.3?
Click to expand...
Yes whole numbers. So if i went from 5.2mmol to 6.4mmol after 2 hrs I’d be ok with that. If I went up to 8.7 I wouldn’t repeat the food/meal as is. If I went to 10.1 I’d avoid it like the plague.
 
HSSS said:
Yes whole numbers. So if i went from 5.2mmol to 6.4mmol after 2 hrs I’d be ok with that. If I went up to 8.7 I wouldn’t repeat the food/meal as is. If I went to 10.1 I’d avoid it like the plague.
Click to expand...

Thanks, that's hugely reassuring given where my readings have been.
 
randomwoman said:
Thanks, this is helpful. I'm guessing from your first sentence that "massively off" means something outside the standard NICE-defined levels then?
Click to expand...

As a T1 my situation is quite different to yours but every now and then I get a blip. I go through the motions of glucose checking, expecting the result to come in at say 8.5ish and it will be 12 or something and I'll have no idea why.

But I wouldn't worry about this kinda stuff just yet!
 
randomwoman said:
Thanks, that's hugely reassuring given where my readings have been.
Click to expand...

I'd just like to add that if a blood test, after eating is a bit higher than you want, it can be worthwhile just eating a bit less of whatever it was in the meal that raised the numbers. Your numbers will vary from day to day, even for the same food and drink, so really we're looking for a range and trends.
 
randomwoman said:
Thanks, that's hugely reassuring given where my readings have been.
Click to expand...


Just remember its the amount of rise from before eating to after - not the specific numbers - for food testing.

And ideally the overall trend of the actual number to be heading downwards. There will always be blips as said above. When I started before meals were often 6’s, 7’s or sometime 8’s. Now they’re usually 5’s and 6’s and even a few 4’s this week.
 
Back
Top