I am not familiar with the book, but based on your review of it, I'd say he was promoting a particular kind of very active management of diabetes, rather like those of us who manage our diets through low carb or low GI or whatever.
Psychiatrists, even in the USA, have studied general medicine before specialising.
Fresh and raw is good for you, can't argue with that. I regularly have a lunch that consists of leaves, nuts and berries (I believe an avocado is a berry).
A vegan diet is not unhealthy. It may not be for you, but it is not unhealthy. I speak as a fairly strict vegetarian (but not vegan) and I know what it is to treated as a bit (and sometimes more than a bit) odd. Try being a vegetarian in the USA :shock: :wink:
As for a culture of death, well a lot of perfectly legal activities and cultural norms might actually be very bad for us or for the planet. So he isn't wrong there either.
Speaking in quite extreme language is good publicity, especially if it gets you on the telly when you have a book to promote
So you can't fault his publicity machine. The important thing is that someone buys your book rather than follows your advice :wink:
I'm afraid I can't quote sources, but I have seen some articles that say that a bit of hunger is actually good for you interms of longevity (but we are not talking about malnutrition here). I can't remember where I saw this, but I think there was a BBC health story within the last couple of weeks about this.
The dangerous bit is confusing T1 and T2, but people do that anyway :| And also by assuming that all diabetics are the same - we aren't :roll:
As far as a cure goes, I wonder what would happen if he went back to his old diet? I think it would be a cure, if after a period of treatment you stopped being diabetic and could eat what you liked, when you liked. But otherwise I think I'm going to be a diabetic for the rest of my life, unless red's fairy godmother has a few extra wishes for me.