Not sure why you're directly insulting Kevin.
Sounds like you subscribe to the Eat less move more fatty method. Trouble is the CI side of the equation can't keep being reduced forever. What then? I was getting unwell (7 chest infections in 7 months) and decided to give up trying to lose weight. I expect you will dispute that there is such a thing as starvation mode.I also share your experience, although I'd guess mine is 100% psychological. It didn't start that way, back as a kind. But I view the process as a self-fulfilling/self-defeating process, which certainly makes sense in my case.
If LC is the only thing that has worked, then do what you have to do. I'd suggest a different outlook on the diets that you found didn't work, but ultimately, just like the question "What is the best exercise?" The best answer is "The one you stick to".
With regard to cardio not helping, I think that's a question of perspective. I used to believe that cardio could be tapped into to a much greater extent than it probably can. Having read Herman Pontzer's 'Burn', a little, I tend to think about things differently. That's not to say that cardio can't be effective, it's just there will come a point (perhaps sooner, rather than later), when the body fights back. It may not be apparent in the workout, at that current moment, but the body has ways of down-cycling that often go unnoticed (reduction of NEPA, NEAT etc.). Ultimately, cardio should be done for all the other benefits it offers, and should definitely be part of the CO side of the equation. But for overall long-term weight success, either leaning more into the CI side, or better still just viewing loss over a much longer period seems to bring many folk more chances at long-term success.
But no, the weight doesn't magically fall off.Nothing magic about any of itIt's often very hard work, especially after the initial bulk drop. But as cliché as it is, it's definitely useful to keep in mind how long it took to accrue the weigh, originally
Perfectly explainedYou cannot burn stored fat for energy if insulin is high. Insulin will likely be high if the person has diabetic pathology, whether or not their blood glucose is being kept at reasonable levels, or whether or not they’re hungry. A massively obese person can run a hundred miles and will not be able to burn much, or any, stored fat so long as insulin is still frantically trying to keep their glucose at manageable levels. In such settings insulin levels remain high almost always, even if blood glucose appears normal.
The body simply will not access the stored energy, but it will definitely make more fat if you continue to eat glucose. Essentially the flow of fat energy becomes a one way street until insulin levels are low enough, which won’t happen overnight. If one gets their preponderance of overall energy from dietary fat, there is a massively lower requirement for insulin to deal with the mopping up of glucose. Therefore giving the person a much better chance of lowering insulin levels long term.
I can’t explain my understanding any clearer than that.
Again...your model fails to explain how a growing number of diabetics who greatly increase their carb-intake, not only lose a ton of weight (Presuming they needed to) but also put (or are getting close to putting) their T2D into remission.
I agree in part.I actually believe energy balance is correct. I also believe fine tuning the macros is super important too! It’s the icing on the cake… sorry…
If a new T2 were to ask me for advice, I’d recommend, a meter and low carb 100% of the time, it’s definitely the right tool to get out of that bad spot.
Currently, I believe eating whole, or at least not overly processed foods, focusing on protein, in a energy balance is a good way to avoid metabolic issues.
If you don’t want to track macros and calories, just do keto/carnivore because it just works out if the box.
Thank you. Actually being able to see my feet and count the family jewels in the bath was my Huzzah moment. I did get fat adapted on keto for a while, but I lost too much padding off my posterior, and sitting in the bath was no longerr a painless experience. I know I was fat adapted since i was getting readings in the 2's and was able to cope with them easily. i even played a hand or two of solitaire and did a jigsaw while under the limit. Just has a slight problem with vision so tested, I think I was 2.1 that time. Now I have dialled back a bit (my GP wants me flying round the control tower at 7 mmol/l instead of the 5 I was aiming for. Places me back into prediabetic but should still be reducing the comorbidities. My most recent HbA1c was taken just after I left hospital after 2 weeks of Eatwell and all my diabetic sweeties banned. it came in at 45. I have recovered some of that ground again since, and my averages are running at around 6 using lowish carb highish fat.Stunning success Oldvatr, and with your now-slim figure you can easily reach to pat yourself on the back - as you should.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?