carty said:I do know that you shouldnt take vit D if you have high serum calcium so if you are worried you need to check if you have high serum calcium if it is not tested in your normal blood tests maybe ask your GP for a test
CAROL
Hobs said:You would be much better off with a high output broard spectrum daylight lamp shining on as much bare skin as possible. That way your body would manufacture all the Vit D your body needs ...SO much better than any pills etc
noblehead said:Personally I'd want to know if I was deficient in Vit D before embarking on a high-dose, why not get tested first?
oldgreymare said:Well a couple years ago I decided to get my Vit D levels checked. Came back 10 ug/L - moderate deficiency. Supplemented 2,000-4,000 U D3- improved to 58 ug/L : Ok for normal, but suboptimal for osteoporosis (which I have), then moved to 6,000 D3 - improved to 67 ug/L, but still below recommended 70+ ug/L for osteoporosis condition. Now taking 8,000 D3 - will report next level (in a few weeks). My serum calcium and phosphate levels are normal.
Hobs is correct - natural sunlight or correct UV lamps are far more efficient ways to generate vit D. I use supplements as I just don't have that much access to outside daylight in spite of living in SE Asia plus my family has high history of malignant melanoma. But I know at least one Premier League football Club that uses specialised UV light beds (NOT set to tanning wavelengths!!!) to keep players Vit D levels up during the winter. This (and BTW sleep patterns) are strongly related to player performance.
As for me I can't definitively say D3 specifically made a difference to my health but I noticed my skin quality (thickness, healing of wounds, rashes) seemed to improved and I believe my chronic low grade anxiety has significantly abated.
Hope this help! Best of luck with your tests.
craig81 said:One theory that the reason vitamin D levels are so low in the population is because of our over consumption of calcium. Calcium is a healthy nutrient; but only when it is taken within a proper ratio with magnesium. The problem we have is that our population no longer drinks hard water, which was magnesium rich. Nor do we consume a nutrient rich diet in whole foods - and so the calcium magnesium balance is out of whack. Calcium can be Jekyll or it can be Hyde. With magnesium in a proper ratio it is beneficial. Without sufficient magnesium it can become toxic within the body over the longer term. Or so the theory goes. The body is very complicated. I'm actually in awe of how complicated we are.
Anyhoo, the other part of this theory is that the combination of high levels of vitamin D and high levels of calcium lead to calcification within the body. Therefore, as a protective mechanism, our bodies down regulate the synthesis of vitamin D in order to prevent this from happening when we over consume calcium - in the absence of enough magnesium. Aren't are bodies wonderful, amazing things (diabetes apart)? So I guess my take on this is that supplementation of D3 can be beneficial as long as we are taking enough magnesium to ensure that calcium intake is healthy. Otherwise you run the risk of overriding the bodies protective mechanism, which could, as the theory goes, lead to calcification within the body over the long term. Personally, I supplement with D3 drops (2000iu daily) and take magnesium chloride daily (400ml). I do feel better doing this but acknowledge it could all be a placebo effect. Please let us know what your vitamin D3 levels are when you get the results back.
Cheers,
Craig
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?