• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

Latest Bloods & the Statin debate

I agree that what you describe here is the current understanding of the basic endocrine function, but I note that your definitions of the functions of HDL and LDL is in antithisis to those described by Prof Ken Sikaris, and the American research papers I have read recently. Thus I am confused as to which does what.

EDIT: Here is a training course I found on the web that gives the basic info on pathways
https://courses.washington.edu/conj/bess/cholesterol/liver.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:

@Gezzabelle
Hi, Really feel for you. It does sound like an impossible situation. The one positive thing is that it sounds like your GP did actually hear some of what you were saying but unfortunately was not able to offer any sensible advice. Have you seen a specialist regarding your abnormal ferritin level? Just wondered if that was addressed if that could help.
I'm also trying not to lose any more weight as BMI is now under 20. I'm fortunate that I can eat Lidl rolls which I think, if I remember correctly, you now have problems with. Can you up your proteins a bit? I don't go for very high fat but still my fat intake is probably higher than they would recommend.
Are there others on this forum long term diabetics with suggestions?
 
I found NOT losing more weight the most difficult part of my journey so far. I reached my target weight very easily, but maintaining it was a different matter. I just kept on losing. It took at least 2 months of trial and error until I found the right balance. I was already eating a lot of protein and didn't want to increase the carbs. I just upped the fats, bit by bit until I got it right. I was quite concerned about what this might do to my cholesterol, but needn't have worried. I saw yet another improvement in the lipids, and continue to do so. I've maintained now for over 12 months.
 
No one has suggested any tests at all other than a liver scan that came back okay. Basically they say they don't know why it is going up...but tests over and over just confirming it has gone up or down are achieving nothing at all. I am currently looking at my fat intake and will attempt to cut it down. I eat enough protein I think...I make up my meals from meat/chicken etc with good vegetables and include some fat but not excessive. She said omg you mustn't use extra virgin olive oil....I said umm...I only cook in a little bit of it...I'm not drinking the **** stuff!!! When I asked what I ''should'' use to cook she looked at me blank....she had no answer for me. I am able to eat Lidl rolls now. They were affecting my hormone levels and causing blazing hot sweats by seemingly raising my estrogen levels....I have corrected that by using progesterone cream to balance it out and it seems to be working. Oddly enough, I asked about the symptoms I was getting from hormonal imbalance and was told to take estrogen....which is the exact thing that was causing the problem!! When I told them I knew it was progesterone I needed I was told I had no clue what I was talking about and was offered anti depressants instead !! By applying progesterone the problems I was having have disappeared...so maybe..just maybe I know my own body better than they do
 
He said ' eat less!'

If eating less was the whole answer, then we'd all be successful. My GP referred me for bariatric surgery because that was the only way for me to see somebody who could tell me why I can eat much less than my BMR and still not lose weight and indeed sometimes actually gain weight. Just as well I kept I good food diary on my "Weight by Date" software on my desktop. I think I may have overloaded them with my breakdown of what I was eating and what was in it (10 things like fat/chol/carbs/iron/protein etc). I was actually "interviewed" by a psychiatrist and a nutritionist whose major comment about my food diary was "why do you eat so much fish?"

My only consolation is a letter from the NHS stating that I have a weight problem, not an eating problem (there's a surprise) and that there was nothing they could do to help me. I must get it framed sometime.
 
At that time, I was walking and using three times the caloric intake needed for my job, than I was actually eating but the locum never understood that.
He dismissed me as eating too much! Never asked the relevant questions or information of why I was gaining weight.

I fear for any patients if this was his 'best efforts'!
 
Interesting article on LDL -c and -p Not all LDL is bad.
http://www.docsopinion.com/2012/11/21/the-difference-between-ldl-c-and-ldl-p/

The more I read the more I see prone to diabetes tagged on every illness going. Either researchers are lazy or getting paid to tag diabetes on everything. Havent decided which yet. Touch wood, so far I am only diagnosed with diabetes, high cholesterol and high blood pressure. I am starting to think my diabetes is because 1) I have a stress related illness 2) I have low Vitamin D 3) I plainly eat too much even though Im at 1300 calories volumes seem to count. 80g cabbage in a day bs ok 200g cabbage in a day bs high (or could be just the stress). I read every ones illness if its related to diabetes hence me seeing everything is linked to it. Dont eat too much protein, protein turns to glucose, you will get problems with you kidneys and liver, eat the eat well plate (no way why would I want to feed my diabetes with more sugar!) Ive never been a big sweet eater. I do pile my plate with vegs and meat though. On top of that I used to eat lots of bread and potatoes. Now I have cut out the carbs Im stuck with eat proteins and fats. Drs are against the fats (hence me looking at HDL and LDL) and protein could give me problems with liver and kidney functions. I cant live off water or maybe I should for a fasting day lol.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The reasons why you shouldnt use Extra Virgin Olive Oil to cook with. http://www.savorylotus.com/5-reasons-to-stop-cooking-with-olive-oil/ Its fine cold.
 
I don't use Extra Virgin Olive Oil for cooking any more I now use cold pressed British rapeseed oil which can withstand cooking temperatures much better.
 
...there's a medical misunderstanding about the whole cholesterol thing....

Can I adopt you!?.. to take you with me for my appointments..pull you out of 'bag' for immediate lesson when doctor start nagging at me about cholesterol and when I refuse those horrid statins again... You would come so handy.....
I keep reading and scribbling notes, but when it comes to talking...I forget most of the facts that I'm supposed to tell him
 
According to prof. Ken Sikaris LDL`s are not a problem, it`s when they get altered and become VLDL`s that they can form plaque in your arteries, and as I understand it , if your triglycerides are below 1 you are not forming any VLDL`s at all so no need to worry.
 
You could always politely refuse the 3 monthly re-tests, saying that they cause you anxiety and seem to be of no benefit. I have been refusing Cholesterol tests for 4 years, I know that I will never take statins so there's just no point having the discussions, just a waste of my time and theirs. My total cholesterol (when last measured) was 9.6 -and I literally never give it a second thought, did you know that the women with the higher cholesterol actually live longest?

Surely an annual test would suffice. I'm sure I read somewhere that donating blood will bring ferritin levels down (sounds plausible). Hope you have a rare blood group and they'd like lots of it.

You have done absolutely, brilliantly well. Just keep doing what you are doing, your body is telling you it is liking it! Have confidence in your decision, it is working for you 100%. Your HDL will certainly have risen, that is bound to be the reason for your measly rise in Total Cholesterol, keep your diet exactly as it is, it's working!
 
That is pretty much what I am going to do ....refuse to go back every couple of months for tests that are achieving nothing. I am aware of the giving blood to ease the ferritin levels but I don't think the nurse or doctor is as they openly admit they have no clue as to why its rising or what to do about it. Testing my cholesterol should be an annual thing and will be from now on. I am far more concerned about keeping out of diabetic figures than I am about cholesterol and it's possible effects and lets face it...they aren't even sure about what effects what any more. Every day brings new guidelines and confusion so I will just go on eating as I am now and save myself the hassle and worry of it all. They want my cholesterol down to 3.0....the only way to achieve that is with statins as we can only make a difference of 10% with diet. 3.0 is an artificially induced state that this particular little body is quite happy not to be
 
Actually, I thinl Prof Sikaris starts the cycle with VLDL, which becomes LDL as it is used by our cells. It is the oxidised LDL (which he calls small dense LDL) that is the artery clogger.

You are right in that trigs < 1 is a good sign and what we need to aim for. There is also a new marker for CVE risk, but I am not sure what the ratio to use is. Anybody got this in their notes?
 
Yep, my mistake.....never was much good at the technical stuff!
 
Saw this on another forum and thought of you Gezzabelle

http://anthonycolpo.com/statin-drugs-a-massive-useless-dangerous-scam/

I have spent the last four years reading everything I can get my hands on about Cholesterol / diet / diabetes - it has become my passion, some might say my obsession, and I could recommend lots of great books, but I am aware (I am retired) that not everybody has the time / inclination to do that, but for a succinct summary of the real balance of risks in the Statin debate, this is superb.
 
Hi. I am an engineer who used statistical methods to analyse data, but I am by no means an expert. However, I did get hold of some of the data from the ASCOT=LLA trial, as well as some others,and I found considerable evidence of misrepresentation of the results in favour of statin therapy. The whole methodology used to justify the conclusions was blatently false.
I am glad that others have independently found the same as I did, as in:

Researchers David Diamond and Dr Uffe Ravnskov closely examined the data from three controversial statin trials: JUPITER, ASCOT-LLA, and the British Heart Protection Study. They concluded "the presentation of statin trial findings can be characterized as a deceptive strategy in which negligible benefits of statin treatment have been amplified with the use of relative risk statistics, and that serious adverse effects are either ignored or explained away as a chance occurrences."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This news report on the DCUK site is relevant to this thread, so I am copying the link for reference:

http://www.diabetes.co.uk/news/2016...k-of-complications,-study-finds-99786479.html
 
In the U.S. the government has just announced cholesterol in food is no longer considered risk for heart disease. Also, that eating saturated fat makes your LDL particles big and fluffy and can do no harm. It's eating high glycemic carbohydrates that creates the tiny VLDL particles that cause atherosclerosis, foam cells, and heart attack.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...es-for-americans-go-ahead-and-have-some-eggs/
Also that statin drug use increases risk of t 2 diabetes by 61% in postmenopausal women, and 50% for the rest of us. http://www.m.webmd.com/diabetes/news/20150304/statins-linked-to-raised-risk-of-type-2-diabetes
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn More.…