I agree. There is nothing wrong with constructive criticism. However, that would imply that you have some knowledge of LCHF but it is evident from your posts that this is not the case. In order to obtain a balanced view and offer constructive criticism you need to read both sides of the argument.
I have no issue with the route a fellow diabetic takes to get control over their bs. In many of my posts to newbies I have often mentioned low GI as a solution, clearly stating that whilst I prefer LCHF other members have had success with this way. I have then gone on to tag someone (quite often
@douglas99 ) and said that they might be able to help. What I object to, is the fact that you complain specifically about people who follow LCHF replying to newbies (LCHF bashing yet again) and that they bombard the newbie with information rather than giving them a chance to come to terms with their diagnosis. My understanding is that the forum is a place for information as well as emotional support so it is clearly acceptable to give both. As another member has already pointed out to you, how we get there is not important, it's that we do get there. I find your comparison between smoking cigarettes and eating fat to be misguided at best.
You go on to talk about getting the correct message out to newbies. I do not think it is misguided to post a link to dietdoctor, where the advice provided is given by a doctor who specialises in diabetes and obesity. I would like to credit the person reading the posts or posting with enough intelligence to make their own decision about the way forward.
Finally, you have implied that I have treated you as if you were a student. I would challenge anyone who presents such an unbalanced and uninformed argument. I believe that's called constructive criticism.