Increasing scientific evidence is showing that low carb diets increase the risk of T2D. Low blood glucose caused by low-carb diets accelerate the risk of insulin resistance and eventual diabetes. The research also shows that low-carb diets can cause cancer because of the associated higher consumption of animal protein.
I suppose the longer you live the more likely you are to get cancer of some kind, so by prolonging your life by eating low carb you are also increasing the cancer risk??Increasing scientific evidence is showing that low carb diets increase the risk of T2D. Low blood glucose caused by low-carb diets accelerate the risk of insulin resistance and eventual diabetes. The research also shows that low-carb diets can cause cancer because of the associated higher consumption of animal protein.
Is that a "alternative truth"?
Which evidence?
I am seeing my web developer tomorrow to start a site where "we" can post numbers and gather stats on all the key markers. I mentioned this some time ago and work got in the way; this will be my way to prove that LCHF, ND, IF etc work and what habits / protocols successful advocates adopt (this part of the site will be foc). I intend to have graphs, and to be able to slice and dice information. If this is successful, relevant information will be available to the powers that be. I will open up another thread for more ideas from anyone who wants to contribute, but everything in a full blood count will be included, diet and exercise regimes.We live in a world which labels Atkins a fad diet - Wikipedia removed my link to this forum in minutes, and my comment about anecdotal evidence of diabetes control.
It seems that there is a firmly fixed mindset about low carb, held in the face of all the experience of weightloss and improved health.
I'd like to see how Wiki would cope with all the diabetics in remission on this forum adding in their comments - probably just suspend the editing of articles - they would not want anyone to suspect them of bias now, would they.
I am seeing my web developer tomorrow to start a site where "we" can post numbers and gather stats on all the key markers. I mentioned this some time ago and work got in the way; this will be my way to prove that LCHF, ND, IF etc work and what habits / protocols successful advocates adopt (this part of the site will be foc). I intend to have graphs, and to be able to slice and dice information. If this is successful, relevant information will be available to the powers that be. I will open up another thread for more ideas from anyone who wants to contribute, but everything in a full blood count will be included, diet and exercise regimes.
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2017-09-biomarkers-blood-strong-role-food.htmlWhich evidence?
Emphasis mine. From what I've read and seen for a series of reason people don't change their habits both on physical activity and diet, so the problem is not solved. Also the diet proposed to patients by GP and nurse is a lot of time wrong and not following the guidelines, or isn't stressed and explained what are the key points.In contrast, those type 2 patients who just take the pills and don’t radically change their diet end up with a progressive degenerative disease and end up on increasing dosages of insulin.
I agree that the government's low fat eating guideline is hard to follow and is probably healthier than the standard western diet (high fat, high carb, and highly processed). (As an aside, I usually ask doctors and nurses that I'm having a consult with if they follow these guidelines. No, they don't.)Standard low fat diet is difficult to follow for a lot of people, but if one sticks to that diet results are obtainable, dame thing for Mediterranean, DASH or LCHF.
Jason Fung found he could reverse type 2 diabetes in about 90% of his patients using a combination of intermittent fasting and low carb diet.
Try watching some of Jason’s videos on diabetes. There is one linked in my signature.Hi @Art Of Flowers could you provide a source for this? I have yet to see Dr Jason Fung giving stats from his practise...perhaps I have missed it...
Hi @Mbaker ..I am seeing my web developer tomorrow to start a site where "we" can post numbers and gather stats on all the key markers. I mentioned this some time ago and work got in the way; this will be my way to prove that LCHF, ND, IF etc work and what habits / protocols successful advocates adopt (this part of the site will be foc). I intend to have graphs, and to be able to slice and dice information. If this is successful, relevant information will be available to the powers that be. I will open up another thread for more ideas from anyone who wants to contribute, but everything in a full blood count will be included, diet and exercise regimes.
Try watching some of Jason’s videos on diabetes. There is one linked in my signature.
My nurse told me more or less the same thing. She herself told me that she follows the LCHF diet and how much more healthy that she feels.I agree that the government's low fat eating guideline is hard to follow and is probably healthier than the standard western diet (high fat, high carb, and highly processed). (As an aside, I usually ask doctors and nurses that I'm having a consult with if they follow these guidelines. No, they don't.)
However, I suspect that the number of type 2 diabetics that follow the government eating guidelines and achieve and maintain non-diabetic blood glucose levels is vanishingly small. This is likely why I was told on my first consult with a diabetes nurse that if I followed their eating guidelines (low fat/high carb), my diabetes would get worse over time and I'd be on more and more diabetes drugs and eventually on insulin and then die younger than the average person does. That was hardly a confidence builder for their recommendations.
I told her than I was not going to follow their advice and that I didn't plan on my diabetes progressing. Four years later and I have normal blood glucose levels and am on no meds. And I have found low carb eating quite easy to maintain, especially compared to the government guidelines, which left me feeling like I was starving.
OP's health claims sound remarkably similar to something I overheard a nursing aide telling someone in the next bed when I was in the hospital last week, she was explaining that she was a bit tired because she had been listening to a 19 hour audio book given by a vegetarian friend. The takeaway message of the book seemed to be get everything from veggies and grains and cut animal 'products' down to less than 5% of food (these animal products appeared to include dairy and eggs).
I gently suggested that there was good new research backing the 'other school' of low carb and healthy protein and fat and she told me that the book specifically warned against ' these fad diets'
Thankfully I met with some good responses from some of the other health care people I met (I think I'll make a post about the range of responses, it was interesting).
It's not just big pharma, veggie oil producers and cheap junk food manufacturers who will be panicking about the latest findings on carbs, saturated fat and cholesterol. I should think the vegan/vegetarian lobbies must be pretty unhappy. The 'heart health' dogma has been one of their major selling points.
I think that there is likely to be a lot of incoming obfuscation and cherry picking to try to defuse/defend the status quo.
Give me the good quality research and I'll read it. One of the big gains from being diagnosed is that I've improved my critical thinking about 'evidence'
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?