You don't need to be wearing a tin hat to be dubious about mask advice given the very weak science that hasn't clarified things. I do not think this is a conspiracy rather that panicked governments saw China reacting to it in an authoritarian way, copied this approach and took a nuclear option (lockdown, closure of schools) with horrible consequences and a failure to protect the people who are actually very vulnerable e.g. the very elderly.I can understand and respect the belief that they're ineffective. Also that they promote a sense that people are safe because they and those around them are wearing masks, and so social distancing measures can be ignored.
I'm more curious about the borderline conspiracy stuff: that nearly every government in the world has colluded to play some sort of massive practical joke on us all. Also, the credibility that this seems to have with some very intelligent and well educated people I know. It's almost on par with the outright virus deniers. And there are a fair few of those about.
Great N=1. For next experiment check out the germ count on your fabric versus correctly fitted ppe perhaps?I did a little experiment on a hot day where I’d been wearing each type of mask we use at work for well over an hour, lumping heavy patients about and generally getting quite hot & sweaty. No difference in my measured oxygen levels. Only n=1 of course. View attachment 43623
I do not think that the queen is a lizard either but I have no idea why you think we are in the middle of a pandemic when we are in fact at the tail end of a not very dangerous upper respiratory virus that takes out the vulnerable elderly just as such viruses always do. There is of course a panic pandemic.In what way can you understand something that has no evidence? Why would you respect or believe something that is quite clearly wrong? There is stacks of evidence going back 20 years, research with conclusions stating we should wear a mask. Not reading it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Where does it say it's ineffective, Daily Mail, the Express? No wonder the country is in a mess.
Looking at these re-usable face shields I'd like to suggest that there is just no excuse for non compliance of a mask wearing instruction.
View attachment 43629
Correct me if I'm wrong but we are in the middle of a pandemic, a virus that is spread just by breathing amongst other things. Or am I supposed to believe the likes of David Icke, someone with absolutely no evidence of there being a conspiracy to inject us with nano robots to control us. I don't think the queen is a lizard either.
with respect, there is no proof that it is a big audacious lie, or any lie at all. It seems the debate is still ongoing.So yes I could wear a mask and make the anxious people feel better but then I'd be participating in a big hairy audacious lie which does not sit well with me.
I understand now where you are coming from. You dont believe the virus is dangerous to the vast majority or believe we have a pandemic going on. OK, that explains so much about your posts.I do not think that the queen is a lizard either but I have no idea why you think we are in the middle of a pandemic when we are in fact at the tail end of a not very dangerous upper respiratory virus that takes out the vulnerable elderly just as such viruses always do. There is of course a panic pandemic.
@kev-w exactly what is funny about being worried for my child’s health and well being? You may or may not agree with my thoughts but that is callous.My Year 11 child has been granted an exemption “to wear a mask” in class!! Yes we all know it’ll make him stand out. He’s ok with it, doesn’t seem bothered wearing them, and thinks anyone not wearing a mask indoors/around people are idiots and doesn’t care what they think or if they make fun of him.
Not sure how much use it’ll do without others wearing them but it is fluid repellent Medical iir type so hopefully some benefit still. Also will be sat at the back nearest an open window.
. . . . . . we are in fact at the tail end of a not very dangerous upper respiratory virus that takes out the vulnerable elderly j
This is a a wind up! Right? I didn't think we had trolls on this forum. Something else I've learned today.
For some reason this particular virus also took out a lot of NHS and care home staff and if I'm not mistaken, most if not all 'not very dangerous respiratory viruses' don't do that, or have I missed something. They don't all look that old either.
The sort of thing you are saying because we have freedom of speech is one good reason for us not to have freedom of speech. My heart goes out to the families of all carers who have lost their lives, possibly looking after people who think this virus isn't very serious.
View attachment 43722
Of course the ‘germ count’ on fabric’s a factor, hence the PPE, and hence the reason why when she was working the hot room during the height of the outbreak, our GP next door neighbour entered her home via the side door and put EVERYTHING she’d been wearing at work straight in the washing machine for a super sudsy hot wash and soaped herself before entering the parts of their home her family used. Nobody else was allowed in the area where the washing machine was kept. Her PPE had been bagged and discarded at work.Great N=1. For next experiment check out the germ count on your fabric versus correctly fitted ppe perhaps?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?