Thanks for thinking of me.Hi, I am sorry. Haven't seen your posts this last week. I flagged to 'watch' the thread, but didn't get any notifications, and thought you had gone silent.
Instead, you have been wrestling with unnecessary hassle and stress, but have a sort of optimistic diagnosis. if you know what I mean.
Anyway, been thinking of you.
How did the conversations with the doc go? And how do you need to change your diet for the surgery?
Good going!
Are you going to get some proper downtime at any point?
I get the need for dealing with, or handing off all responsibility, and definitely get the need to provide presence for students at their critical periods, but you will factor in your own critical down time, won't you?
There's a couple of issues with what you used for the test that might cause a bit of concern - the juice would not be 100% glucose; there would be fructose involved and fructose normally doesn't affect BG to any large extent. You might be wise to re-do the test using original flavour Lucozade? I've also heard of a few people who do fine on OGTTs with glucose, but have extreme BG reactions to starch (possibly because of AMY1 gene variability) - so you might want to redo the test using a starchy substitute, e.g. mashed potato, bread or similar.Results of my home OGTT (75 grams of juice-based sugar after 8+ hours of fasting, that followed 4 days of 100+ carbs):
There's a couple of issues with what you used for the test that might cause a bit of concern - the juice would not be 100% glucose; there would be fructose involved and fructose normally doesn't affect BG to any large extent. You might be wise to re-do the test using original flavour Lucozade? I've also heard of a few people who do fine on OGTTs with glucose, but have extreme BG reactions to starch (possibly because of AMY1 gene variability) - so you might want to redo the test using a starchy substitute, e.g. mashed potato, bread or similar.
http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/newsandeventspggrp/imperialcollege/newssummary/news_31-3-2014-9-58-51
Good luck with your surgery
There's a couple of issues with what you used for the test that might cause a bit of concern - the juice would not be 100% glucose; there would be fructose involved and fructose normally doesn't affect BG to any large extent. You might be wise to re-do the test using original flavour Lucozade? I've also heard of a few people who do fine on OGTTs with glucose, but have extreme BG reactions to starch (possibly because of AMY1 gene variability) - so you might want to redo the test using a starchy substitute, e.g. mashed potato, bread or similar.
http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/newsandeventspggrp/imperialcollege/newssummary/news_31-3-2014-9-58-51
Good luck with your surgery
Amazing, would be cool if you did that!OK. So I lied. I repeated the test with jelly beans (no easy local source for pure glucose, aside from tablets - which have at least scattered reports of being slower acting). Two studies compared jelly beans to pure glucose and found the profiles equivalent (no surprise, since the main ingredient in jelly beans is glucose).
The results were even better. Slightly higher peak (268, as opposed to 238), sharper & earlier drop (down to 161 at 2 hours, rather than 2.5), and back to the starting level at 2.5 hours, rather than 3 hours. That makes sense, since fructose has a lower glycemic index than glucose.
Once I get rid of this cancer thing I've got going on, I'll redo the blood sugar diet & order some pure glucose and do a formal follow up test.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?