What a horrendous outcome....
The wording is interesting.... Consultant forensic neuropathologist Dr Daniel du Plessis told the inquest that he believed it was unlikely that Shay's death had been caused by the insulin. He said: "I have no doubt that there was an excess of insulin given but it would appear that it was not long enough and severe enough to cause significant brain damage. There was no evidence the brain damage was a result of an over-dosage of insulin."
He had been given 10 times the INTENDED dose.... this implies to me that there was a huge mistake in dosing for someone who doesn't have diabetes in the first place. The consultant states he had no doubt there was an excess. This seems to be worded to make it sound not as bad as it was, an excess, it was 10 times the intended dose. I know which one sounds more damaging to me.
There is a lot of info missing in this story still, but I don't like the way they are trying to play down the severity of the negligence that is imo at the center of what happened. It must also be noted that for those who made these mistakes, they are most likely having a very hard time also. There are two sides this tragedy.