• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

Newly Diagnosed

Just to add my twopenneth worth, the advice about not lowering glucose levels too quickly was also given to me a few years back, although I cannot remember specifically who gave it

I have always taken it to mean that lowering levels over a few months rather than trying to do it in a few weeks is better for the longer term outcome.

I assume that insulin has the capacity to bring BG levels down more sharply than diet and/or Metformin thus making the advice more applicable to insulin users.
 
Last edited:

Sorry your thread was derailed a bit, but you may have gathered there is a glitch on the forum which is showing to some members that you are on insulin. If you wouldn’t mind going into your profile and picking the other type 2 option, there’s two there for some reason. That should fix it.
With regard to your blood sugars. Well done on the improvements you have made so far, keep up the good work. The shakiness is probably due to your body not being used to the lower levels, it won’t bother you for long.
 
Sounds like you’re gradually improving. Well done. Feeling a little shakey as the levels lower isn’t unusual. It’s known as a false hypo. And you’re right it’s because your body is used to running high it’s taking a bit of time adjusting as it comes down. Bit like a toddler tantrum wanting it’s carbs back! It’ll improve. Just keep checking. On the meds you have a true hypo (under 4) isn’t likely but never say never.
 

Hi,

I have selected the other type 2 option, has that fixed my profile glitch?

Thanks again everyone for the support and advice, this place is such a valuable resource, I just hope I won’t annoy people asking to much
 
Hi,

I have selected the other type 2 option, has that fixed my profile glitch?

Thanks again everyone for the support and advice, this place is such a valuable resource, I just hope I won’t annoy people asking to much
Thank you for doing that, I was seeing your profile correctly, we’ll have to wait for @Jaylee who was seeing the error to come back on line to confirm is it’s fixed.
This is a great place for support and info, I wouldn’t be as healthy as I am today without it. Don’t worry about asking as many questions as you need to.
 

I can confirm through first hand experience that rapidly dropping HbA1c can cause serious eye damage.
 
Hi,

I have selected the other type 2 option, has that fixed my profile glitch?

Thanks again everyone for the support and advice, this place is such a valuable resource, I just hope I won’t annoy people asking to much

I can confirm your medication status has now changed.
My profuse apologies regarding any misconception. My friend.
My intention was to help as an insulin dependant & not to disrupt any specific query.

@Jim Lahey & I have been in the same "boat" as With regarding anti-VEGF jabs. We've discussed on other topics I appreciate Jim's input. Thanks Jim.
 
There are many schools of thought on the reduction in A1c.

I re4duced my A1c from 73 to 37 in 4 months, with no issues. Last year, having maintained every A1c in the low 30s, my results showed a change, although a check 3 weeks later (when I received the letter) showed no change evident. Who knows what hapened there.

On the thread @Rachox posted (I think - there were a couple around the same time), there were links to papers suggesting retinal changes actually reflected a far more historic period of "control" (or lack of it) - something like 6 years.

It is also worth remembering that people without diabetes can also develop retinopathy, so whilst we are screened regularly, we are far more likely to be picked up in the earlier stages than Joe Non-DiabeticPulic going about his life business. OK, there is no doubt diabetes increases the chances of retinopathy, but is is absolutely not the only cause.

Just sayin'
 
That is strange - I had background retinopathy at diagnosis, but it went away even though I dropped my Hba1c by over 40 points in a very short time. I can understand that high BG levels are really damaging to blood vessels - but what harm is normal?

Good to see some informative posts here for people to make informed decisions. I'm no expert, but its not about it being normal, its about the transition of getting from high to normal and the changes in blood pressure along the way causing damage.
 
Good to see some informative posts here for people to make informed decisions. I'm no expert, but its not about it being normal, its about the transition of getting from high to normal and the changes in blood pressure along the way causing damage.
Ah - you are assuming changes in blood pressure.
One of my wicked pleasures has been watching HCPs not believing my blood pressure measurements, even to the point of getting out an ancient non digital device to check it. Sphygmomanometer doubt strikes again.
 
Good to see some informative posts here for people to make informed decisions. I'm no expert, but its not about it being normal, its about the transition of getting from high to normal and the changes in blood pressure along the way causing damage.

Does it affect blood pressure? If it does, I had no idea. I've never had high BP except temporarily when I was on a medication that caused it)
 
Does it affect blood pressure? If it does, I had no idea. I've never had high BP except temporarily when I was on a medication that caused it)

It does have an effect, I don't know all the reasons behind it tbh, as I've not researched it in that much detail. Was aware of it occurring. In regards to BP s well, you may not see changes from overall readings, but small changes can have big effects on small vessels etc. So when doctors measure it it may be small/no change but in fact some changes have occurred which have a greater impact on small vessels.
 

Thank you.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn More.…