• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

NHS Direct doctor says... NO testing when taking Metformin

  • Thread starter Thread starter 999sugarbabe
  • Start Date Start Date
Great post @Dillinger

If like me, you got the dreaded recommended eat well plate diet, I was ill for more years than I like to remember.
It is as Dillinger has said the carbs that is causing your blood glucose levels to be high.
I can't have carbs in my diet, they make me ill.
The need for this forum is the reason why the recommended diets given by most doctors is so wrong.
The success stories on this forum should persuade you of that!
I am living proof, that you don't need carbs, I am fitter, healthier, and so full of energy, it is beyond most dieticians comprehension!
 
http://www.nursinginpractice.com/article/self-monitoring-blood-glucose-levels

This ongoing controversy led the prestigious journal Diabetes Care to issue an invitation to two authors with opposing views on the usefulness of SMBG in non-insulin taking type 2 patients to publish their arguments for and against. (12,13) Malanda the author of the most recent systematic review argued that there was no substantial evidence demonstrating that SMBG had a positive effect on reducing blood glucose levels in people with type 2 diabetes. Polonsky and Fisher provided an alternative explanation stating that implementing SMBG in unstructured ways was indeed a waste of resources but as part of structured educational package their evidence has demonstrated that those with suboptimal blood glucose control SMBG can be used in partnership with health care professionals to significantly improve blood glucose control.

So this suggests that not only is SMBG useful for all those with type 1 diabetes and insulin requiring type 2 diabetes patients but also for individuals with type 2 diabetes who would like to use it as a way of monitoring their condition. Indeed Polonsky et al found that offering structured training not only to patients performing SMBG but also to their clinicians to help them understand how to support patients, may have enabled the very significant improvements reported. (8) The importance of providing meaningful education to people with type 2 diabetes not on insulin but who want to use SMBG is acknowledged in the NICE Guidance on type 2 diabetes. (14)
 
Bewildered said:
Not testing in T2 is a cost thing, my nurse told me not to bother as eating right and taking mess wil rule out the need.... Mm mm. Could it be that your body released sugar because you had gone so long without food?
Click to expand...
 
My daughter is also on Metformin and has to buy her own test strips, because I am on Insulin, I get mine free. Everyone who is diabetic should be able to monitor their own glucose levels, to be in control. It is a travesty but true most clinics and surgeries have a limited budget and the decision to cut down on issuiing testing kits is purely financial. This monetary consideration, takes precedent over the health of the population. This is not only applicable to diabetics.
 
Brunneria said:
When I told the nurse I test, she told me that they don't advise that. Only type 1s need to test.
Then in the next breath
She told me to come back immediately if my BG ever rose above 12 mmol/l.

Absurd.

Edited to correct from T2 to T1
Click to expand...

And how will you know if it has if you don't teat; bonkers. I was diagnosed with a blood glucose of 18.6 at a routine free NHS health check. I didn't feel ill, had no symptoms so no reason to be tested but was told that my levels were of BS and HbA1c were at the levels where I was in danger of a stroke or heart attack. I can only tell if my glucose is high by testing, it doesn't make me feel unwell, thirsty or any of the other symptoms we are supposed to get.

You would think that it would be cheaper to give people test strips than treat the consequences of long long term poor diabetes control. Worth a letter to the health minister while they are looking to restructure the NHS!
 
I agree testing should be compulsory. However this must go hand in hand with proper training/education, and that would mean admitting that carbs are at fault. It would also cost more money if strips were doled out like statins and no follow up, there are so many diabetics these days that time/staff etc aren't available. Many diabetics I imagine think that taking the pills will sort them out and we all know that's not how it works. People just expect the NHS to pick up the pieces and then DLA to fund them when they have their legs chopped off or they go blind etc. It means taking responsibility for our own health, and while we on this forum are keeping ourselves well informed there are many that don't.
 
Arab Horse said:
You would think that it would be cheaper to give people test strips than treat the consequences of long long term poor diabetes control. Worth a letter to the health minister while they are looking to restructure the NHS!
Click to expand...

It is much much cheaper. Also consider the implications of having an amputation or going blind or being on dialysis for the patient; they go from being a productive member of society paying taxes to being a recipient of state aid.

The trouble is the cost centres are different so no one makes that equation; test strips come out of GP's budgets, hospital admissions/procedures are under a different budget and tax/welfare are completely separate.

It's the wonderful world of healthcare!

Best

Dillinger
 
Exactly Dillinger, it is a false economy isn't it but they don't seem to learn.

Ali
 

Possibly the wrong forum for this but here goes nothing...

As a conservative Yankee, I'll offer my perspective on the entire government controlled, or directed, or however you want to call it....health care notion.

Health care costs are totally out of control and I certainly see the need for revision. I just can't wrap my arms around the idea that the government, (yours or ours), is going to make things better. However, let's assume for this argument that there is no other choice and there really is no going back.

IMHO, this creates a mindset, (among some), that the government's role is right and proper and dare I say EXPECTED??? The real downside, in my mind, is that so many folks give up on taking control and responsibility and just rely on the drugs handed out. This creates a perpetuity that is bad for the individual and society.

It would be wonderful if we could have these things handled for us without any collateral damage. But you can't get someone hooked on a system without it spilling into the way that they view the world.

JMO.

In case you hadn't noticed, I offered no solution. I should be a politician.
 
I was diagnosed in the early 1990's.I was prescribed Metformin initially and over the years progressed to the max dosage, not only of metformin but gliclizide and sitaglyptin, until the doctor told me at the end of last year that he could do no more and referred me to the hospital for suitability of insulin.
In the early days with my GP I was given a meter and a diary, I followed the regime given me to the letter, put the results into a computer spreadsheet to work out averages (all in single figures) and proudly presented these to the Doc who in return showed me my Hba1c results which bore absolutely no relationship or comparison to the diary I had spent the previous 6 months compiling.
I attended the practice's clinic every 6 months for the next couple of years with the same results until I got fed up and binned the meter, and just kept taking the tablets until my Hba1c passed the point of redemption and the hospital recommended insulin.
To my disappointment I then found I had to continue with the metformin and all its anti-social side effects.
The only thing regular testing did for me was to give me something more to worry about and the resulting high blood pressure
 
Last edited by a moderator:

I use every single test as a guide and monitor for my diet choices.

If something I've eaten sends my blood glucose higher than I want, I eat less next time, or avoid that food completely.

It took a couple of months of intensive testing, but I'm confident now about everything I eat, and its impact.
Basically I eat to my meter. Which has resulted in a low carb diet and steady, non diabetic readings - although if I eat a slice of bread and a piece of cake, I would shot up to the mid teens.
Best thing this forum has ever taught me.

Edited for an irritating apostrophe.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
 
Hi , I hope my thoughts applicable to me are helpful to you :T2 and metformin
a) when newly diagnosed after major non related surgery , my gp practice was great and provided a meter and test strips .
b) after about two years I have recently got a letter - out come ....no test strips or needles can be provided by prescription .

- The evening I got that I was deeply upset since it impacted on the deep trust I had previously experienced in the NHS care provided previously .
Observations - when newly diagnosed I had to contact the needle supplier via their helpline and ( though obviously keen to sell their products ) were very concerned that the needle stick was faulty .

Further conversation with their care line ,if I recall correctly was excellent :

a) newly diagnosed - why not try testing every couple of hours at first and write down food/glucose levels and feelings
b) they thought tit that UK testing was so limited ....why not before , after meals and track a trend with different foodstuffs ( excellent advice) - it was alleged in germany it is common to test often . Then you get to know what foods /when and how to manage them .
c) stick to one type of meter and do check it for inaccuracies .

Personally
,

a) I cannot imagine how a newly diagnosed t2 metformin user can understand the impact of foodstuffs and control their levels without a meter .
b) ALSO I HAVE NOTICED A LONGER TIME SPAN BETWEEN NHS ANNUAL EYE TESTS and 8 weeks on I have to chase for results .
c) PLUS I AM GOING TO CHECK it is doing all the NHS checks that the private eye care provider has to do re NHS eye testing .

d) Similarly , deeply saddened by the GP letter I have now gone out and had to purchase the items myself .
e) I find reading the balance magazine helpful
f) My sugar levels go up with anything with diet in ie sweetners . So you may want to check that out .with your meter
g) for me I can take fizzy water and then add lemon to it -I steer clear of fizzy diet drinks
h) and finally ........my personal opinion is that the short term drops in prescription budget is a precursor to hugh financiail and physicla costs as NHS patients cant help themselves to control their disease .

My pharmacist suggested that I went back to the GP and said it was essential to my care .
 
Unfortunately, in my experience this is true.
 
Kate, sorry to reply to this late, you probably know all this by now.

But anyway. No it isn't, not really, not if you want to be well and to be better. I think Jenny Ruhl at http://mobile.dudamobile.com/site/phlaunt1?url=http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes/#2897 is a very good guide, and absolutely reliable. Read around her site. Also another book called
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/184...hen+becker&dpPl=1&dpID=41Z0WzpCiSL&ref=plSrch

But as to why/how you should test, read here:

http://mobile.dudamobile.com/site/phlaunt1?url=http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes/#2831
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bravo @Dillinger !! Bravo.

Cor you're wonderful.

Lucy
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was told a few years ago that testing wS an expensive commodity if only on meteor min. From then on I felt I was too expensive for the NHS to bother with me. Result - my bolide sugars went haywire and became worse when I be cane wheat intolerant. Result- high abh1c, result- now on gliclezide a low carb diet. Got test strips back begrudgingly and often have hypos!
If the test strips hD not been taken away my sugars would not have got out of control I believe. False economy by NHS
 

Wrong end of the stick a tad, my dear chap: the test strips are to enable us to take responsibility/ control for our own condition- the reason they keep giving for their refusal, is that "they" know best and we should not bother our foolish wee heads over the nitty gritty of our own condition. Now THAT smacks more of the attitude you are against, surely?
 

I wasn't replying to that particular end of the stick, but rather to the "big picture" stick. Which is this: Because there are so many that willingly and happily latch onto the government teat, it creates problems for legitimate needs and concerns. It creates a divide. And it gives ammo to those that would deny, (test strips in this case), needed supplies or services.

That is "collateral damage" that I spoke of. There can be a tendency to "assume" that people are out to milk the system because so many are.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn More.…