• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

Parcel deliverer with diabetes fined for day off for doctor visit sadly dies

A courier driver with diabetes who was fined by his employers for taking time off for a hospital appointment has died. The widow of Don Lane, from Dorset, says her late husband feared taking time off to get care for his condition because of £150 penalties imposed by delivery firm DPD if he did not manage to get his round covered. Don, who was 53, was fined for taking a day off to see a doctor and also missed appointments with specialists because of the pressure imposed by the company, it has been reported by The Guardian. Ruth Lane, has criticised DPD for failing to honour its "duty of care". In a statement, DPD said it was "profoundly sorry" about the charges handed out. Last summer Don collapsed twice at the wheel of his work vehicle, with one of the episodes resulting in a diabetic coma, and then was fined in July because he attended an appointment about his diabetic retinopathy. He disputed this charge saying that he had informed the company months before. Don also collapsed in September and then December as he worked through the busy Christmas period. Don, who had worked for DPD for 19 years, sadly died on 4 January at the Royal Bournemouth Hospital. As well as Ruth, he has left behind a 22-year-old son. Speaking to The Guardian, Ruth said: "There was a constant threat of a fine. They had to deliver the parcels to tight slots and the pressure to get them done was huge. He was putting the company before his own health. He wasn't able to do his parcels first and make the hospital appointments, so he would cancel on the day. "He collapsed in January 2017 and they knew that because they collected his van. It was after that Don cancelled three appointments. DPD had a duty of care to make sure he got to those appointments, but they failed in it." DPD said it was "profoundly sorry" about the charge given in July but claimed there had been "confusion" about the incident. DPD said it had monitored Don's health in 2017 and that his route "was convenient for his hospital appointments". The company added: "In relation to Don's poor health at the end of December 2016 and into January 2017, we refute the claim that he was under pressure and threatened with a £150 charge." The company added that drivers "do not have to provide the service personally, and drivers have the option of providing a substitute driver in the event of sickness. Don was aware of the need to provide a substitute." Editor’s note: Employers have a requirement to make reasonable adjustments for diabetes appointments under the Equality Act 2010, and an employer should not put you in a situation either where you are disadvantaged because of your diabetes or your health is affected as a result. Picture: The Guardian

Continue reading...

I have wondered for a long time that effect our demand for 24/7/365 shopping would have. It is ridiculous that retailers think we ALL want it yesterday.
I fully empathise with Mr Lane and his family, mainly because my company insist that I take a days holiday for any medical/dental reasons. They will not allow any time. I have cancelled/rearranged loads of appointments in the hope that the next appointment will fall on a time/day when i can get there without interrupting my work.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We all have a responsibility for our own health, and he should have taken time off for appointments. Yes it's tough but I have to take unpaid leave as I work in a school so don't have any 'holiday' to take. If I need to be home for say a gas service or when I wanted to go to my children's graduations I had to either work extra hours to earn time off or take it unpaid. My husband doesn't get sick pay in his job. He had to take holiday when he had an operation. Surely even DPD drivers don't have to work 365 days a year?
 
@LittleGreyCat I admire you for writing this! It is pretty much what I was thinking, but didn't want to say as I thought I would get a bad reaction. There are two sides to every story and as I've said in another post, we are all responsible for our own health.
 
A local courier driver I know is set up with two vans and many members of her extended family able to drive them, they make good money, while having a flexible life, by understanding what it means to sign up to a self-employed contract, rather than just seeing being "self-employed" as a way to pay reduced NI. They also go out at the times people are most likely to be at home etc, so have to do fewer return visits.

The problem comes when people think of this type of setup as being employment and "just a job".....
 
Back
Top