Jonathantype2
Newbie
- Messages
- 3
Hello and welcome to our forum. Yes, a peak of 14 mmol/l is to be avoided. Food intake and timing are the two factors you can modify.
In my view the most important blood glucose readings are those that indicate the carbohydrate impact of the food you've just eaten. You’ll learn most from blood glucose levels just before you start a meal and then two hours later. The post-meal reading should be no more than 2 mmol/l higher than first and not higher than 8 mmol/l. If that's the case, your body dealt with the arrival of glucose in your bloodstream and cleared it relatively quickly.
By adjusting your meals, you can reduce those peaks to healthy numbers.
I think you need to think about both the height of the rise and the duration.Hi
I can’t find some info anywhere. I wonder if you experts can help, please.
I am T2. Well controlled with Metformin apparently. No symptoms yet.
Wanting to learn what foods affect by BG most, I spent a fortnight with a Libre 2. Noting what I ate vs BG levels.
89% time in range (5-10 mmol) After meals usually back in range within two hours. So far so good.
But what I want to know is what is a reasonable peak level? Even if it doesn’t last long? Different foods clearly produce different peaks, but is a peak of 14 or 15 mmol/l to be avoided if possible? Or is that ‘normal’?
Thank you
ThanksI think you need to think about both the height of the rise and the duration.
The range normally suggested by NICE - the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence - is for your blood glucose to be under 7.8 mmol/l two hours after eating, and within two mmol/l of your pre-meal value. Link below:
The purpose of testing before and after meals isn't to see "how high you go" but to see how effective your insulin response is at clearing excess glucose out of your blood. If you get a second reading at (say) 9.0mmol/l two hours after eating, that's clear evidence that your system could not cope with the level of carb (and resulting glucose) in the food you ate. So, if I got one, I would consider a 14 or 15 figure to be problematic.
What does the damage is elevated blood glucose over time. It doesn't have to be all that elevated, either - I had a good number of diabetic symptoms long before I was at "officially" diabetic levels. It seems to be the case that some people (like me) can't cope with even moderately elevated levels but others can tolerate higher BG levels without suffering immediate problems.
What are you eating regularly that produces these sorts of results?
Congratulations on keeping your blood glucose readings in range most of the time.Thank you very much. My levels are usually within the range you suggest, within two hours of eating.
So the peak levels I referred to are only brief. Are short-lived peaks a problem in themselves?
The thing is that it's all digestible carbs, not just sugar, that affect blood glucose. Those carbs are digested to glucose very quickly, which is why we'll see peak impact typically in the first hour after eating.Thanks
My downfall is muesli and / or marmalade on toast for breakfast.
Plain yogurt and fruit, and toast and peanut butter or cream cheese, seem to cause very mild and short - lived BG peaks. And obviously other proteins such as eggs, are the same.
But ‘No added sugar’ Muesli and marmalade on my toast both create peaks. Both in one meal gives me a high and longer lasting peak. I don’t do that any more!
I realise that my sensitivity could be a great deal worse, and I do consider myself fortunate.
And obviously other proteins such as eggs, are the same.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?