So far hubbys by hasn't been effect much by fruit at all. I do measure what he has and a my most 2 small bananas in a week and 6 grapes per serving again twice weekly max. And as yet we've seen no spikes from these. His highest spike have been following shredded wheat for brekkie (nurses advice to eat) so they are a no no from now.Many people diagnosed with T2 are also told that there is some measure of fatty liver present which can lead to NAFLD (which can progress) so the second thing (the first is obvious, to bring down elevated bg) is to try to empty the liver of its fat stores. You may beleive that fructose doesn't raise bg but I'm just n=1 and my bg soars after having a normal portion of fruit e.g a medium sized apple or bananas and as for grapes... forget it.
So far hubbys by hasn't been effect much by fruit at all. I do measure what he has and a my most 2 small bananas in a week and 6 grapes per serving again twice weekly max. And as yet we've seen no spikes from these. His highest spike have been following shredded wheat for brekkie (nurses advice to eat) so they are a no no from now.
His daily bgs are fluctuating between the high 4's to the low 10's over the last 7 day with the 7 day average being 7.3. Initial bloods that prompted repeat testing was 24.4, 7 days later 12.2 and now at the above so numbers are going the right way.
My comment was directed at the member who beleives that fructose in smaller quantities is acceptable
my point is that some people with Diabetes are not able to tolerate it even in small quantities.
This is a forum for people who have diabetes. So saying fructose is not something you should eat, on this forum does not include people without diabetes. I would imagine that is accepted. Fructose may well be alright in small doses the same as eating carbs may be alright in small doses. But for diabetics I would suggest that the cumulative effect is what got most of us here. I would always caution people on this forum to stay away from fructose, it is not essential and is of no use to your body or well being. It is not a requirement for your body like any other carb like foodActually I believe what I said was that it was acceptable for me in response to a suggestion that it was extremely UNacceptable for EVERYONE in any quantity, which I believe I have shown not to be the case.
I wouldn't argue with that. But "some people" and "everyone" are not the same thing. Some people are lactose intollerent, but that doesn't mean that a morsel of cheese is lethal for everyone.
PDR
Stay away from the following:So far hubbys by hasn't been effect much by fruit at all. I do measure what he has and a my most 2 small bananas in a week and 6 grapes per serving again twice weekly max. And as yet we've seen no spikes from these. His highest spike have been following shredded wheat for brekkie (nurses advice to eat) so they are a no no from now.
His daily bgs are fluctuating between the high 4's to the low 10's over the last 7 day with the 7 day average being 7.3. Initial bloods that prompted repeat testing was 24.4, 7 days later 12.2 and now at the above so numbers are going the right way.
This is a forum for people who have diabetes. So saying fructose is not something you should eat, on this forum does not include people without diabetes. I would imagine that is accepted. Fructose may well be alright in small doses the same as eating carbs may be alright in small doses. But for diabetics I would suggest that the cumulative effect is what got most of us here. I would always caution people on this forum to stay away from fructose, it is not essential and is of no use to your body or well being. It is not a requirement for your body like any other carb like food
@PDR the important thing is that you have found the way that works for you which is not the same as finding what will work for everyone.
I think you will have to realise that people dont have to agree with your point of view. We are all different. Thats what makes these forums great. The ability to give your opinion on what you believe to be the right choice.So in summary - anything I say based on actual evidence is clearly a special case which only applies to me and my mutated metabolism, where anything said by others with no evidential support must be the general rule. Yes, that makes a lot of sense...
PDR
Whilst I say that we are entitled to our own opinions we are not entitled to our own facts. I have not read every study you posted but I did read that EXCESSIVE fructose appears to be the problem.
You have to understand that people (me included) dont much care to be told its ok to eat fructose but not too much,
I would rather just not eat it,
as it can cause problems with your liver etc etc . I would suggest especially on this forum that members would be very careful about putting any level of fructose in their system no matter how small.
Which is precisely what I said - multiple times, so I'm not sure where this suggest I am introducing "my own facts".
Some do, some don't. That's rather the point. I'm like that with chocolate, bread and rice - I can't do "moderation" for these things so I just avoid them completely. But that's a very different thing to talking about less than 2g of fructose 2-3 times a day in coffee. I've not seen anyone "binge coffeeing" just to get fixes of fructose. At that level of consumption it has (according to the actual evidence - other peoples' facts, not mine) no more or less concerns than any of the other sweeteners. I see people saying we should stick to a particular sweetener because it's a plant extract that's "all natural", so it must be good. That's amusing - hemlock and aconitium (wolfsbane) are natural plant extracts after all...
And that's fine - you have a strategy that you've chosen to suit you, as I have with chocolate, bread and ferraris. But that doesn't inherently mean that eating fructose in any quantity must be dangerous. Others can choose different strategies - we are allowed to have different opinions where the available facts don't contradict them (as in this case).
...and there we go again! The available facts only indicate that it "can cause problems with your liver etc" when it is consumed in excessive quantities. There are no studies that I have found showing evidence that it is harmful in quantities that are nearly 2 orders of magnitude less. You can have your opinion and construct your strategy to suit your characteristics. But people didn't say that - they said "you should avoid fructose like the plague" as if it were an actual fact that it is poisonous (which it isn't).
People get hysterical about things - they here things which were never actually said. Someone on here referenced two websites which cited studies to support a claim that Fructose was an evil plot by the despotic food industry (to what end wasn't clear), even though the actual studies cited didn't say what the websites claimed they said. And that's the point. People are still hysterical about the long-disproven concerns over MMR vaccines. I've seen people suggest that diabetics should avoid cheaper whiskys which use caramel as a dye - although the amounts are absolutely miniscule and if people are drinking enough whisky for it to even register they have far more significant things to worry about (like the 10 bottles a day whisky habit which is needed to make the caramel dose an issue).
Please learn to separate personal opinions and strategies from evidence-based advice!
PDR
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?