Hi @exmpoortom and welcome to the forum.
Here is my best attempt at answering your questions:
1. It is a fairly arbitrary threshold between 'pre-diabetes' and Type 2 diabetes. The moderators tend not to agree with me but I consider the Type2 designation to be merely the point at which the risk of diabetic complications (blindness, amputations etc.) is high enough for doctors to take it seriously. Different countries can have slightly different ranges for 'pre-diabetes' as well as different measurement systems. In my opinion most people with 'pre-diabetes' will progress to Type 2 diabetes if neither they nor their doctor takes some action.
2. & 3. 'Cure', 'Remission' , 'Reversal' are all fairly contentious words with regard to Type2 diabetes. Some people (very few indeed) have claimed to gave 'cured' Type 2 Diabetes such that they can now eat the same old garbage that they ate before their T2 diagnosis. Personally I'm doubtful of such claims, though they may be correct for anything up to a few years or so.
In my opinion when a poor way of eating causes metabolic disease, then you may well be able to reverse it by eating better, but reverting to eating the same old garbage will ultimately bring on the metabolic disease again.
Remission/ control such that the person no longer meets the criteria for Type 2 diabetes or pre-diabetes, is certainly possible and has been achieved by many people (several thousands if you apply fairly relaxed criteria), using a few different methods. For many/most who do it using the Low Carb 'Way Of Eating' approach, this appears sustainable over decades.
4. I'm not familiar with that particular testing machine. In the UK we measure Blood Glucose in mmol/L - millimoles per litre (in the USA, Germany and some other countries it is measured in mg/dL - milligrams per decilitre). What constitutes a 'good' number depends very much upon when the blood is tested since readings vary considerably depending upon when they are taken, what the last meal eaten was, when that meal was eaten, plus exercise, infection, medications etc. etc.
The Fasting blood glucose number is the trickiest of all, so personally I only measure something that I can control - which is the effect of a meal on my BG. I aim for an increase of no more than 2.0 mmol/L from just before a meal to 2hrs after 'first bite' . Though the actual profile of BG after a meal over the next minutes/hours depends upon many factors including the time of day, how long the meal took, how many carbohydrates were eaten, whether they were eaten near the start of the meal or towards the end etc.
Arbitrary figure .... if you have an HbA1c above 40 mmol/m then you are likely to already be susceptible. The 42-47 "pre-diabetic range" means you likely already have developed the problem and the 48 or higher range just means its more definite.1. What is actually the difference between pre and t2? I understand the figures but what does it mean? If i go across to T2 does something fundamental "break" in my internals which can never be undone, or have they basically picked an arbitrary figure that's been agreed upon to be classed as T2?
Eating "normally" kind of depends on when "normal" started.. more than 10,000 years ago pre grains and farming most of what is currently considered "normal" didn't even exist. With things like potatoes not arriving until 500 years ago so they definitely aren't normal and as for bananas...2. With regards the above i see many, Fung included, saying IF can cure T2. Is it a cure or is it just, managed or in remission, and he's using semantics? If its a cure could that person then eat "normally" and their blood work be ok? Or is it just that cos you're not eating any carbs you're merely just not aggravating the condition. (e.g cats give me asthma, i avoid cats and don't have asthma - but my asthma isn't cured)
As implied above pre-diabetes is just less badly disregulated blood glucose than "proper" T2. Cured is one of those words that means different things to different people. By every diagnostic measure I am cured (apart from maybe mild insulin resistance).3. Can pre diabetes be "cure" if the above can't?
How much are the test strips? That would be my criteria for a machine..4. I have a "safe AQ" testing machine from amazon i've been using but still a little confused with numbers etc. Could someone please tell me an ideal range in fasted state and post meal state, or the best way to test if i'm improving?
@exmoortom
Noting the oft quoted 80:20 rule that 80% of overweight/obese people do not develop T2 diabetes.
So presumably either they don't develop IR or they have a rough, tough pancreas that can handle anything.
Lots of us use the Tee2 from Spirit HealthcareThank you very much for the detailed and thorough reply. much appreciated. I'm in the UK, i think the machine i have might not be that great tbh, is there one that people on here regard as a fairly reliable one?
I did 3 tests today on mine, i was 4.5m when i woke, 5.2 at 12 (dunno why it went up i was still in fasted state, and then 5.2 again 2 hours after i ate lunch, which was low carb.
Arbitrary figure .... if you have an HbA1c above 40 mmol/m then you are likely to already be susceptible. The 42-47 "pre-diabetic range" means you likely already have developed the problem and the 48 or higher range just means its more definite.
Eating "normally" kind of depends on when "normal" started.. more than 10,000 years ago pre grains and farming most of what is currently considered "normal" didn't even exist. With things like potatoes not arriving until 500 years ago so they definitely aren't normal and as for bananas...
As implied above pre-diabetes is just less badly disregulated blood glucose than "proper" T2. Cured is one of those words that means different things to different people. By every diagnostic measure I am cured (apart from maybe mild insulin resistance).
I however have no wish to put myself through hell again by eating carbohydrates.. why would I? I no longer really consider them as suitable food for humans.
How much are the test strips? That would be my criteria for a machine..
Ideally I aim for 4-6 mmol/l at all times pre and post prandial and fasting.
Not at all.... depending on what they ate some non-diabetics can go a lot above 6 mmol/l .So would a non diabetic never have a reading above 6 then?
Lots of us use the Tee2 from Spirit Healthcare
In the early days I was around 9 and 10 a lot of the time.
Why are they so casual about telling people they are 'pre diabetic' as if it were nothing? If you had a smear test for example which came back with 'pre cancerous cells' I doubt they would dismiss it so easily and although they are very, very different, they are both potentially impactive on your health negatively. Give the diagnosis or pre diagnosis AND the research & information to go with them! I know not everyone will then take it seriously by any means but when you're waved off with a dismissive attitude people assume or think it's nothing so never follow up or realise there are things you can do about it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?