I guess I am just miffed by the last set of tests and the fact that this journey does not appear to be linear. Perhaps I am also not grateful enough about what I have achieved so far. Again, massive thanks for replies and tolerating what could appear to be a virtual whinge! It wasn't and I genuinely wonder where do I go from here - not down to the lake I fear!
Thanks Bluetit1802, I just have this obsessive nature to always "win" better, higher faster etc. Yes, I read about the OGT but I reckon my personality traits would have me obsessing if it revealed anything outside of excellent - LOLFor the life of me I can't understand what is wrong with your last set of figures! If you convert them to mmol/l the difference is miniscule. It is a rise of 0.3mmol/l on approx a 3 month average, and still perfectly in the non-diabetic range. I think you may find most of us fluctuate by a little bit each time.
Have you done an OGTT at all? A few of us did one at home a while ago. They are quite revealing.
The 15% came from Prof Taylor's first two trials of the Newcastle diet. All who finished the diet succeeded in getting down to their personal fat threshold and on average they lost 15% of their weight at diagnosis. That is only a rough guide for us. However those subjects were given all sorts of tests and in particular put through a super model of an MRI scanner which revealed that they had lost all their liver and pancreatic fat.Just read the PFT thread started by Guzzler on October 1 2017. The theory put forward by Prof Taylor seems about right for me - Tanith put a value of about 15% body weight loss @ diagnosis. I initially lost over 20%+ in under 6 months.
In that thread there were mentions of TOFI and a link to a scientific definition around ones AAT/ASAT ratio. Is this metric something people can easily obtain in the uk?
I am still left wondering if T2 control aside there is a natural weight for people. Guzzler raised the concern in the thread I read that he would need to drop to a medically concerning low weight in order to go into reversal. I am happy with good control but would like to get a handle on a personal optimal weight, calorie, carb environment.
As I type this I can already anticipate the replies = wouldn't we all! just have to read, experiment and test!
Thanks to Guzzler and Bluetit1802 who have helped me to think through some issues. As the song says, in a very short time "we've come a long long way together"
Hi everyone, me again
After being diagnosed last month I’ve spent a lot of time reading the forums, various diets and literature about the possibility of reversing or the very least managing the condition through diet/lifestyle changes.
I was wondering does time have an effect on improving/reversing diabetes? What I mean by this is since being diagnosed I’ve already lost 12kg now by going to the gym and changing my eating habits and am happy with how things are going but it’s going to take a while to get to my target weight and I as wondering if you have a better chance of reversing the condition by doing a rapid weight loss plan like the Newcastle diet?
I’ve done the NHS milk diet in the past and lost 6 1/2 stone in just over 2 months which was a record back in 2005 so I can do that sort of rapid diet so basically what I’m asking is if it’s better to lose weight quickly or slowly?
Hi Anthony1738Hi heres a good read for you http://www.ncl.ac.uk/media/wwwnclacuk/newcastlemagneticresonancecentre/files/Diabetes reversal information 2017.pdf
Type 2 is caused by fat stored in the liver and pancreas, once you loose this fat the diabetes goes away, but if you put the fat back on your liver and pancreas the diabetes will re-apear, but as Prof Taylor explains not all fat people will get diabetes, it all depends on your personal fat threshold, I for instance, discovered that my fat threshold is at BMI 23 and if I keep at or below this figure my diabetes is non existent, no matter what I eat, but I achieved the required weight loss quickly by eating a low carb diet. Hope this helps. PS I cut down on the beer also.
Hi and welcome @Adz444
the evidence from the Newcastle Diet (all info available on the Newcastle University website) seems to show that the chances of reversal deteriorate the longer the person has type 2 diabetes. Also that if the type 2 has diabetes caused by a fatty liver, then the amount of weight lost from the liver to allow the reversal is small - but obviously very significant! Body fat goes too, of course, but the crucial fat is the liver fat.
as for speed of loss, prof. Taylor has himself said that the period of rapid weight loss and use of meal replacement shakes were designed to allow controlled study conditions. He supports weight loss by any method, and at any speed.
so i would suggest that you consider your own preferences. if rapid weight loss worked for you, then it may work again. For me, I had a 10-15 year period of yoyo dieting, and I'm never doing that again!
there are lots of options - 800 cal of real food (blood sugar diet), 800 cals of shakes and veg (Newcastle Diet), any variation on fasting (see Jason Fung's blog called Intensive Dietary Management), and then there is the whole gamut of weightwatchers, slimmingworld, variations on low carbing, and so on
- although i would encourage you to be as careful of blood glucose control as you are of calories.
Yes it makes sense.. but it depends on you. You say you lost a lot of weight in the past but I'm guessing you regained most if not all of it.. ? maybe more even?
If you decide that Low Carb is the way for you most of us look on it as a life change not a "diet" in the classic sense (i.e. something that you only do for a limited time). The ND is fine if
1) you can be hungry for 8 weeks
2) can maintain the weight loss ..
I'm sceptical that many can do that so the symptoms just come back along with the weight.
I look on my LCHF non-diet as my way of eating for the rest of my hopefully extended life.
I also lost quite a bit of weight pretty fast without feeling in any way deprived following this regime and who doesn't prefer a nice steak over a shake?
Anyone can do anything for 8 weeks if they want to.
The LCHF is a way of life - forever. That is much much harder surely.
I am a little frustrated with the above post - so I want to push back on it - I hope it does not appear rude I just do not think it is balanced or evidence based.
So I am not sure that @bulkbiker has tried the ND and if he has and these are his experiences of it - then I apologise.
As someone who has tried it or is trying it (5 more days) - I want to debunk some myths if I can to make sure your questions are answered.
1. You are not hungry for 8 weeks that is a complete exaggeration and not based on evidence.
I can base the evidence of my own experience. You are hungry some of the time but probably on a percentage basis less than 5% of the time. Possibly even 1%. I have had a few days here and there where I could of done with something to eat - and guess what - the same was true when I was on LCHF. Perhaps I was just fanciful. I would also add that most of the posts I have read from people who tried it report a similar hunger pattern. I have not read a post, and perhaps I have missed it from someone who tried it whom said they were hungry for 8 weeks.
2. I do not think you need to maintain the weight loss in any different way to any different way of eating. If you eat too much full stop - even on a LCHF - then you are probably going to make your T2 worse. There are plenty of posts from people who have tried LCHF who lose some weight then put it back on plus more. I am sure that is because in some way the diet of their configuration of it is not quite right but the LCHF is by no way a magic bullet to weight loss.
3. I would add - what is 8 weeks compared to a life time? The LCHF is for life. If you are really happy to do that and have great personal control and BG control and do not want to try an 8 week experiment that might not even test your resolve, then perhaps the ND is not for you.
4. On the weight - I have done a lot of research on this and my understanding is that you will put some weight back on at the end of the ND - some may not but a lot will - and there are ways of controlling this (the 5/2 as an example, Or why not LCHF which works wonders - but whilst you need to be really careful you do not put a lot back on - it is the fatty liver and pancreas you need to avoid so a little bit more weight (a little!!!!) is probably ok.
5. Lastly - I notice that posts get configured depending on the debate point. Sometimes people post that you do not need to be on shakes to do the ND - then sometimes you get the shakes comment from the same posters. If you want to do the ND on steaks - fill your boots. As many of the well researched people often say (and I include @bulkbiker here) you do not need to do the shakes. I chose to. There are lots of examples of people who would prefer a shake to a steak.
At this point you would think I am not a massive fan of the LCHF - but I am - I think it is brilliant. But I like things to be in balance and I see absolutely nothing wrong with the science based approach of the ND and why on earth if you can and want to you would not spend 8 weeks giving it a go.
Be aware though - just like everything else - it might not work for you it does not work for everyone.
Point 1 agree completely although 8 weeks of being at least a bit hungry is quite hard for most people and I would imagine that most fall at the first week or two without some kind of support
Point 2 I disagree... what is hard about eating great food that is satisfying and delicious? It's all about mindset I think..
Well I can only speak for me not for everyone.
At this moment in time I would love a take away with sweet and sour pork balls and a bowl of rice - a nice sticky sauce followed by some lovely banana fritters and custard. That to me is good food to - I am hoping at some point some for of reversal will allow me to do this because - personally - I am going to find sticking to the LCHF diet a real pain all of the time.
I noted you posted once that when your hubby brings home a Chinese take away....That's what I mean about mindset.. you are thinking of LCHF as restrictive.. change that around and think of it as healthy and yummy and you'll find it so much easier. I can remember the bright red sauce on those pork balls and to be honest now it turns my stomach a bit.. I'd far rather have some crispy pork belly without the sugar.. but as always each to their own.
I noted you posted once that when your hubby brings home a Chinese take away....
I have got the mindset - I really have - but I do miss a lot of things - I do - I cannot help it. In a way I wish I was built with your determination and control it is awesome. Christmas is coming and you should tasts my Mum's Christmas cake - that would test a saint.
I noted you posted once that when your hubby brings home a Chinese take away....
I have got the mindset - I really have - but I do miss a lot of things - I do - I cannot help it. In a way I wish I was built with your determination and control it is awesome. Christmas is coming and you should tasts my Mum's Christmas cake - that would test a saint.
Not me I'm afraid as I always hated Christmas cake... and I'm afraid that hubby is of Chinese origin and would never ever touch sweet and sour pork balls.. they are about as Chinese as mushy peas... crispy duck however is something else completely.
Maybe looking on some of those foods as "poison" would help... oops I did it again...
cheesy sprouts with bacon..? does that help just a bit maybe?Can you NOT mention crispy duck please! Fortunately for me I also have never liked Christmas cake or mince pies or that most revolting thing christmas pudding. I don't even like turkey. So that's sprouts, roast potatoes and cranberry sauce left. Oh ........ that's just sprouts to look forwards too.
I have got the mindset - I really have - but I do miss a lot of things
Personally I don't see why eating LCHF stops you from eating Christmas Cake as long as you don't do it every day. Just 'cause someone eats LCHF most days doesn't mean that they can't have the odd meal that isn't.
I am a little frustrated with the above post - so I want to push back on it - I hope it does not appear rude I just do not think it is balanced or evidence based.
So I am not sure that @bulkbiker has tried the ND and if he has and these are his experiences of it - then I apologise.
As someone who has tried it or is trying it (5 more days) - I want to debunk some myths if I can to make sure your questions are answered.
1. You are not hungry for 8 weeks that is a complete exaggeration and not based on evidence.
I can base the evidence of my own experience. You are hungry some of the time but probably on a percentage basis less than 5% of the time. Possibly even 1%. I have had a few days here and there where I could of done with something to eat - and guess what - the same was true when I was on LCHF. Perhaps I was just fanciful. I would also add that most of the posts I have read from people who tried it report a similar hunger pattern. I have not read a post, and perhaps I have missed it from someone who tried it whom said they were hungry for 8 weeks.
2. I do not think you need to maintain the weight loss in any different way to any different way of eating. If you eat too much full stop - even on a LCHF - then you are probably going to make your T2 worse. There are plenty of posts from people who have tried LCHF who lose some weight then put it back on plus more. I am sure that is because in some way the diet of their configuration of it is not quite right but the LCHF is by no way a magic bullet to weight loss.
3. I would add - what is 8 weeks compared to a life time? The LCHF is for life. If you are really happy to do that and have great personal control and BG control and do not want to try an 8 week experiment that might not even test your resolve, then perhaps the ND is not for you.
4. On the weight - I have done a lot of research on this and my understanding is that you will put some weight back on at the end of the ND - some may not but a lot will - and there are ways of controlling this (the 5/2 as an example, Or why not LCHF which works wonders - but whilst you need to be really careful you do not put a lot back on - it is the fatty liver and pancreas you need to avoid so a little bit more weight (a little!!!!) is probably ok.
5. Lastly - I notice that posts get configured depending on the debate point. Sometimes people post that you do not need to be on shakes to do the ND - then sometimes you get the shakes comment from the same posters. If you want to do the ND on steaks - fill your boots. As many of the well researched people often say (and I include @bulkbiker here) you do not need to do the shakes. I chose to. There are lots of examples of people who would prefer a shake to a steak.
At this point you would think I am not a massive fan of the LCHF - but I am - I think it is brilliant. But I like things to be in balance and I see absolutely nothing wrong with the science based approach of the ND and why on earth if you can and want to you would not spend 8 weeks giving it a go.
Be aware though - just like everything else - it might not work for you it does not work for everyone.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?