Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Soapbox - Have Your Say
Sir Muir Gray grrrr
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MikeTurin" data-source="post: 1426632" data-attributes="member: 318833"><p>The most worrying thing is that this "doctor" seems that doesn't know the latest research that for instance are saying that modern healthcare namely statines could be a cause of T2 diabetes, or that T1 and T2 seems to have a genetic correlation.</p><p></p><p>Now it's true that T2 can be <strong>controlled</strong> by getting a more healthy lifestyle, and because diabetes is not widely screened it's possible that pepole are T2 but don't know it and will not know it. This doesn't mean that T2 is a serious condition and that anyway the second leg of controlling diabetes, namely check the blood glucose, it's never mentioned.</p><p></p><p>People like this "doctor" are detrimental because blaming people for a conditions doesn't solve the problem for the single person and for the NHS balance. By the way diabetes if one hast to change its name should be called sugars and starches intolerance, and then one should ask why if one has starch intoleance should eat a lot of starchers when one has to eAt few fats anc cholesterol to don't become fat or get high cholesterol.</p><p></p><p>By the way. Metabolic Syndrome is a different thing in respect to diabetes, so ipercholesterolemy, i suppose that a "doctor" should know this.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MikeTurin, post: 1426632, member: 318833"] The most worrying thing is that this "doctor" seems that doesn't know the latest research that for instance are saying that modern healthcare namely statines could be a cause of T2 diabetes, or that T1 and T2 seems to have a genetic correlation. Now it's true that T2 can be [B]controlled[/B] by getting a more healthy lifestyle, and because diabetes is not widely screened it's possible that pepole are T2 but don't know it and will not know it. This doesn't mean that T2 is a serious condition and that anyway the second leg of controlling diabetes, namely check the blood glucose, it's never mentioned. People like this "doctor" are detrimental because blaming people for a conditions doesn't solve the problem for the single person and for the NHS balance. By the way diabetes if one hast to change its name should be called sugars and starches intolerance, and then one should ask why if one has starch intoleance should eat a lot of starchers when one has to eAt few fats anc cholesterol to don't become fat or get high cholesterol. By the way. Metabolic Syndrome is a different thing in respect to diabetes, so ipercholesterolemy, i suppose that a "doctor" should know this. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Soapbox - Have Your Say
Sir Muir Gray grrrr
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…