Yes- I was eating 1200 calories a day for about 6 weeks and had a quick couple of pound weight loss followed with a small gout flare and lack of energy. I went up to 1400 to 1600 calories per day now for about three weeks. You can see a detailed discussion of my diet in the thread "Protein levels". I am at a very slow weight loss of 1 to 2 pounds a month now. My motto is moderation in all things-especially due to several health conditions that impact my diet. My HA1c just went from 7.5 three months a ago when I joined the forum to 7.0 last week. (I am in the USA that would be a change of 58 to 53 if you are in the UK). My couple of pounds of weight loss also puts me back in the overweight range rather than on the lower edge of obese where I have been hovering for several years. I have also posted several days worth of my diet under" Diabetes discussion-Type 2-What have you eaten today?".I added a 10 minute walk after lunch to several days a week after reading an article about it here on the forum.The important thing is to eat to your meter.( Just ask if you do not know what that means.) And limit carbohydrate intake to levels that give you good blood glucose readings. I eat 80 to 120 carbs a day trying to stay on the low end of that range. I never eat more than 40 carbs at one time and always with protein and/ or fat to slow down the spike in blood sugar. I am still on metformin and insulin but we will see what happens as I continue to control my carb intake. (With the exception of a few extra carbs for Christmas of course!)
The main focus of the approach is to mimic the results seen in bariatric surgery. Hence "Any pattern of eating which brings about substantial weight loss over a period of time will be effective. Different approaches suit different individuals best."
This would include intermittent fasting or multi-day fast that results in sustainable ketosis and fat loss. But the level of reversibility depends/differs for each of us. Many may be able to reach normal glucose/HbA1c levels. Very few, if any reports restoration of first phase insulin response and norm glucose response as measured by OGTT.
All the best.
Intriguing. Definitely shows that moderation can work. I plan to lose about 14lbs myself, hopng for about 1lb per week fat loss.
True, although theoretically it seems that any length of time to result in substantial fat loss would still do the job. I am somewhat lucky, I've only been diagnosed with prediabetes (fasting blood glucose of 6.1mmol/L). I'd like to see it come back to under 5.5mmol/L. So I imagine a fair amount of fat loss should do it.
My HA1c just went from 7.5 three months a ago when I joined the forum to 7.0 last week. ... I am still on metformin and insulin
I wanted to know if people have had success with reversing diabetes via a more moderate calorific deficit rather than the more extreme deficits presented in the studies.
Really? With a hba1c of 53 and taking insulin you are answering yes to "have you had success with reversing diabetes"? It's obvious you have had success with improving your health, but not with reversing diabetes, so far.
A hba1c of 7 (53) while a great improvement, is still definitively diabetic, the cut off being 6.5 (48).
And you're taking insulin, so the strives you making in controlling blood sugar cant really be seen as anything like reversal of diabetes. But it's great you're happy with the contol, sounds like you're working really hard.
OP was asking whether people had had success in reversing type 2 diabetes with moderate calorie diet.
@SWUSA_ answered
Really? With a hba1c of 53 and taking insulin you are answering yes to "have you had success with reversing diabetes"? It's obvious you have had success with improving your health, but not with reversing diabetes, so far.
Is it sustainable over the long term? Calorie reduction doesn't work long term therefore carb reduction is better?
Is it sustainable over the long term? Calorie reduction doesn't work long term therefore carb reduction is better?
Very easily sustainable.
I think you are making the mistake of thinking you need to eat low calorie for life, (like low carb), but the difference is you don't.
If you do manage to reverse diabetes by weight loss, it's relatively easy to maintain the weight loss, and eat a balanced diet, without worrying about meals out, overly 'carby' choices, and a bit of weight gain can be easily fixed by simply reducing the calories again. (But still eating some carbs. just less)
My preference now is a mediterranean diet, which gives a good variety of options for me.
I hope this helps explain it.
Weight Loss may assist with diabetes management.What is a balanced diet? What you are describing is IMO a weight loss diet but not a diet for controlling diabetes.
What is a balanced diet? What you are describing is IMO a weight loss diet but not a diet for controlling diabetes.
Weight Loss may assist with diabetes management.
"By losing weight, people with type 2 diabetes can become less insulin resistant, and they’re able to use insulin better."
https://www.endocrineweb.com/conditions/type-2-diabetes/type-2-diabetes-how-lose-weight
The newcastle diet, if correct, infers weight loss actually reverses diabetes.
Personally I find low carb very easy to manage whether cooking at home or eating out. If there really is absolutely nothing suitable (which I have never found to be the case) I would just not eat... which due to being fat adapted is pretty easy.Cheers for the extra info, as I thought it will be individual specific, I think I'll have to wait and see how it goes. I do agree as others have said that it seems like a more manageable diet than low-carb.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?