This. medic talk to medics. Sometimes they even listen to them, too! Less hassle and more chance of the result you seek. Good luck.if your endocrinologist definitely considers you to have Type 1, you could call upon the hospital diabetes clinic to assist with correcting your GP’s records.
Been there, tried that, still hasn't changed.This. medic talk to medics. Sometimes they even listen to them, too! Less hassle and more chance of the result you seek. Good luck.
When I was found to have an issue, I underwent glucose absorption tests, and the diagnosis was Glucose intollerance. No medicine at that time was prescribed, and avoiding sugar brought things onto an even keel. The change was very abrupt, and the full range of medication used for type 2 to stimulate insulin production etc failed to work. The Hospital Clinic pronounced Type 1, total failure to produce insulin, and the comment I was very unlucky and "a statistical anomaly" to develop type 1 in my thirties, it's known but rare. It has always been referred to as Type 1 by past GP surgery, and they had bothered to do specialist training in diabetes, the same has also been the case with all consultants seen, type 1. It is unexplained as to how the current surgery seem to think it's type 2. There is no natural insulin production.I don’t understand what you mean by going from glucose intolerance to full blown Type 1.
Glucose intolerance/insulin resistance is type 2. You cannot change from type 2 to Type 1. You can change your type 2 medication to be insulin but you still have type 2.
However, if your endocrinologist definitely considers you to have Type 1, you could call upon the hospital diabetes clinic to assist with correcting your GP’s records.
Do bear in mind that NICE guidelines have recently changed such that anyone with diabetes treated with insulin should have access to Libre. This is only a guideline and some CCGs take time to catch up.
When I was found to have an issue, I underwent glucose absorption tests, and the diagnosis was Glucose intollerance. No medicine at that time was prescribed, and avoiding sugar brought things onto an even keel. The change was very abrupt, and the full range of medication used for type 2 to stimulate insulin production etc failed to work. The Hospital Clinic pronounced Type 1, total failure to produce insulin, and the comment I was very unlucky and "a statistical anomaly" to develop type 1 in my thirties, it's known but rare. It has always been referred to as Type 1 by past GP surgery, and they had bothered to do specialist training in diabetes, the same has also been the case with all consultants seen, type 1. It is unexplained as to how the current surgery seem to think it's type 2. There is no natural insulin production.
Wow. Are you meaning me or the Consultant Specialist who said it?. His comment was thet the vast majority of type 1 cases emerge either before your late teens or in ones 50's and over ( Juvenile onset and mature onset ). I only know that he, at the time, and other consultants since have remarked that type 1 in ones thirties is not common.The ignorance of that comment, ‘a statistical anomaly to develop type 1 in my thirties, it’s known but rare.’ 20% of all type 1 diagnosis are over 40.
Fortunately, for the most part I can rely on the hospital, and yes, they do provide often better service, the problem comes with the likes of meters. I have just had to cease using my Aviva Expert meters because I am told the strips cannot be prescribed anymore as the meter is obsolete ( according to the GP, then they have always disliked this meter due to test strip costs, but had to live with it because the Clinic issued them) Problems arise when for instance the practice wants to issue one thing, like the meter, and the Clinic something different. The cheapest option for a type 2 was issued by the practice, and I had to quote the then current NICE information and the Clinic to get a new Aviva meter.Hi @Andrew2018 , a lot of the LADA/T1.5 folk here get an original T2 diagnosis, which responds well to low carb and then fails to respond when their insulin production reduces down too low.
And it's called T1.5 because it has elements of T2, including insulin resistance for many? But I don't think the NHS officially differentiate between LADA andT1, they just call everyone T1.
Is there only one GP at your clinic? Maybe you could ask them if they remembers the ex PM Theresa May, who developed LADA in her fifties? If there's more than one, you could name drop LADA to a different one and see if that helps... Maybe you have an older GP who's only heard of T1, T2 and gestational diabetes? (Those were what was around when I was a child/young adult)
Some T2s do gradually stop producing insulin because high blood sugars damage the insulin producing cells, but if the hospital reckons you are T1 then you are.
Are you still being seen by a hospital consultant? Hopefully if you are then they will give you all the correct benefits that T1s qualify for.
The consultant is wrong.His comment was thet the vast majority of type 1 cases emerge either before your late teens or in ones 50's and over ( Juvenile onset and mature onset ). I only know that he, at the time, and other consultants since have remarked that type 1 in ones thirties is not common.
Wow. Are you meaning me or the Consultant Specialist who said it?. His comment was thet the vast majority of type 1 cases emerge either before your late teens or in ones 50's and over ( Juvenile onset and mature onset ). I only know that he, at the time, and other consultants since have remarked that type 1 in ones thirties is not common.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?