There are many here who think Bernstein is the Holy Grail of diabetes management with diet because he has stayed free of diabetic complications. The thing is though is that no one not even himself can say that he may never have had any complications anyway whatever he had done. There are thousands of diabetics in the world who have never heard of Bernstein yet will not have complications and those who follow him but will still get them that is something no one can predict. Yes of course it is good to keep our blood levels as good as we can get them and diet does help but we can only do that with trial and error it is all about what suits us personally because we are all different people. As to the..magic 83... it is obviously a level that does not suit everyone as you have found out I think we all have a level that suits us best
I think the point Bernstein makes is that he managed to reverse complications with his approach, and the "law of small numbers" does make sense.
I strongly dislike his diet though, and whilst he may be eighty-something, I'm not sure how you can do significant amounts of exercise on his approach.
Precisely. Bernstein's approach is inspirational but can also create a lot of confusion in someone who is new to T1 diabetes and tries to stick to the sometimes extreme principles as suggested by his book.Obsessing about being 89 instead of 83 or whatever doesn't seem necessary to me personally.
There are many here who think Bernstein is the Holy Grail of diabetes management with diet because he has stayed free of diabetic complications.
I also think about all those people we hear about who've lived with Type 1 for 50, 60, 70 or even 80 years. Their 'secret' seems to be moderate carbs (way above Bernstein level) and a routine. They may also, of course, be lucky with their genes.
I know I am not T1 but am T2 not on insulin so I can't really say what is best for a T1. Yes you are right about smoking some will suffer bad affects from that some will not so the same with diabetes and diets. Bersteins may suits any number of people but others it may not suit at allThanks PinkOrchid, see what you're saying, but thats what I used to say about smoking, some of us will make it to 90 with no issues, and some will not. Surely we have to go for the best scenario we can, which is why I gave up smoking.
There are some things Bernstein says which seem to be point of scientific fact. For example, the fact it's almost impossible to match your food spike, with the profile of fast acting insulin, and that it must be beneficial to get as close a match as possible between your food and insulin profile, so that your body 'behaves' as near as possible to how it would behave if we did not have diabetes? That premise, seems to be the only one I can find, that despite any concrete evidence, and everyone being different, makes any common sense?
When I was eating more carbs when 1st starting insulin I was hypoing all the time and then spiking. Then reduced carbs and insulin and I can only go so far in either direction. Laws of small numbers was key. I don't digest carbs well anyway so no love lost kicking them to the curbWe basically follow the Bernstein approach with my 5 year old T1 daughter. As a family we all eat about 30g carbs a day. and it works well for us. I love the idea of the rule of small numbers, less carbs, less insulin, so fewer highs and lows. My daughter generally runs between 4 and 7 mmol at all times and it's taken her off the roller coaster. Low carb plus dexcom has given her a hba1c of 5.7% so I'm a fan, but everyone is different.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?