Hi BTWhen are you next due to see your doctor/nurse? Were you told last time you had your test? If you don't know then there is no harm in ringing to enquire. You may be on 6 monthly reviews rather than 3 monthly ones now. When I was moved from 3 months to 6 months I asked for an interim HbA1c which was allowed, but I just had the blood test, no review with the nurse.
Hi BT
My GP is really ****, she thinks that if I have any problem its coz I am thinking about it in my mind and relating it to diabetes.
I dont have any appointments to see them and neither have they said anything about my reviews but when I last saw my DN she said she was quite impressed with my a1c and wanted to use me as a case study if possible but she did say to me we will see you in 4 months and gave me an appointment in may and thats it.
She has given me a FBC form but she said when you come in may you get the test done few days before so I will need that form for then but since my last a1c was in november i would really like to have one done now to see the progress from november to now.
I read a study last year, from 2012 or thereabouts, where they did a load of tests and the result was that the codefree was more accurate than the other brands.
Don't ask me where I found it though, or to find it again
But even with my gluco rx I find the batches of strips vary, sometimes quite a bit.
I also find it annoying that there is such a high degree of inaccuracy allowed for something so important.
I like the sound of thatLiver dump for sure.
ThanksDon't panic, the codefree is fine ...... normally x
Millysue Codefree aint all that bad. The Accucheck and some other meters are way overpriced...I spent a fortune first 6 weeks. Got Codefree and frankly when I went t get my Hba1c reading it confirmed at 5.6 that overall the Codefree had been giving very accurate readings.I have ordered a Codfree meter, reading all the above now wishing i had gone for a different one. At the moment I am using my brothers spare BGSTAR, but replacement strip are more expensive than codfree.
Anyone have experience with the BGSTAR, is it any good,?
Batch 44?
5.6
Just had a bowl of porridge but discovered I have no coconut oil left so put a hug blob of extra thick cream in instead.
I'll check again in a couple of hours.
I could indeed order it online and have it shipped out... I forgot to do it when I made a huge order of coconut oil and meter supplies... I'll be home for a little while soon to sort out my new kitchen, so hopefully STML will not kick in and I'll remember to get the darn stuff... Almond flour, ground almonds, almond meal - all the same thing... It's not so expensive here as it's something of a staple I suppose...I tend to buy in bulk and grind my own - skin and all... there is a milling gadget on the NutriBullet and I use that... coconut doesn't work the same way - it's never as fine, it just tends to clump... Not that you can use much of it, it sucks up water like nobody's business and makes stuff quite dry I think... I am experimenting all the time and need to go over to the other thread to post some recipes when I get them right - I've almost got my almond bread perfect... still testing though...
0.00, totally forgot this morning in the rush to get to work and try to sort a multitude or problems. Usual day for me.
However on averages I will record a 5.5 which is my norm.
Be back with it tomorrow.
Keep well & wrap up tight it's cold out there.
Thanks @daddys1 very interesting! I found the explanation of the chart, which says:
Basically, the 20 meters were all tested 10 times against a laboratory verified sample of 6.5mmol/l. The results above show that only 3 meters achieved a more accurate result (shown by the "bias" column) over the 10 tests but of these 3, only 1 meter achieved a more consistently accurate result (shown by the variance figures in the "VK%" column). In other words, of the 3 meters that had a more accurate result over the 10 tests, 2 of them had much greater variation of results (i.e. less consistency).
What these results essentially show is that the only meter that achieved more consistently accurate results than the SD Codefree Blood Glucose Meter was the Finetest system - a unit which, as far as we are aware, is not available to the general public and is only available to medical professionals.
These results also show that whilst the SD Codefree Meter will consistently give you an accurate result, some better known brands such as the Freestyle Lite and the Bayer Contour will consistently give you readings which are much lower than your true blood glucose level.
So it seems the Codefree is very good, accurate and consistent. I bet they didn't use batch 44 strips during the experiment! LOL
Hi @Bluetit1802
Does this help at all,
Accuracy of the SD CodeFree Blood Glucose Meter
The SD CodeFree Meter is one of the most accurate and reliable blood glucose meters available. Zurich University
Hospital recently (28/03/2012) published research on the accuracy and reliability of the top 20 blood glucose meters
and they came up with the following results:
View attachment 11472
Neil
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?