revive@2
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 46
- Location
- cleethorpes
- Type of diabetes
- Treatment type
- Insulin
- Dislikes
- yobs +litter/.Loud music on t.v. when actors speaking
well that is why we have defunct appendix it churned up the grass and leaves we ate seeminglyI didn't say eating the occasional grain of wild grass would kill you. To believe we risk deficiencies by not eating grain is however rather stupid. I'm talking about the species, not about ethnic groups around the world who started to grow stuff like spuds. Had spuds been essential to us there would be neither spuds nor humans as we wouldn't have been around to start agriculture in South America.
well spinach gives us iron and that really needed .canot eat liver every day can weHere you go:
Why Spinach is Not a Great Calcium Source
Although spinach has a lot of good stuff going for it, it’s not a great source of calcium.
Not all food-based calcium is well-absorbed. Spinach, for example, contains quite a bit of calcium but it also contains a lot of oxalates. These natural compounds bind with calcium and make it very difficult for your body to get at it. Although spinach has a lot of good stuff going for it, it’s not a great source of calcium. In fact, because the oxalates in spinach can bind to the calcium in other foods as well, it can even keep you from getting as much calcium from the foods that you eat with it. Unless you never eat calcium-rich foods except with spinach, this is not a big deal—just something to keep in mind.
taken from here:
http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/health-fitness/healthy-eating/what-are-the-best-sources-of-calcium
(quite an interesting article for a number of reasons)
Curious, I just look at the nutritional site http://nutritiondata.self.com/facts/vegetables-and-vegetable-products/2626/2. I ignore the pyramid but look at the composition of food.It was specifically excluded by name on at least 2 dietary websites I use, it was excluded from almost every other dietary site I visited including the National Osteoporosis site, and only Webmd showed it as a source.
Based on this theory Almonds are not good either because they are high in oxalates.http://www.whfoods.com/genpage.php?tname=george&dbid=48Here you go:
Why Spinach is Not a Great Calcium Source
Although spinach has a lot of good stuff going for it, it’s not a great source of calcium.
Not all food-based calcium is well-absorbed. Spinach, for example, contains quite a bit of calcium but it also contains a lot of oxalates. These natural compounds bind with calcium and make it very difficult for your body to get at it. Although spinach has a lot of good stuff going for it, it’s not a great source of calcium. In fact, because the oxalates in spinach can bind to the calcium in other foods as well, it can even keep you from getting as much calcium from the foods that you eat with it. Unless you never eat calcium-rich foods except with spinach, this is not a big deal—just something to keep in mind.
taken from here:
http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/health-fitness/healthy-eating/what-are-the-best-sources-of-calcium
(quite an interesting article for a number of reasons)
Almonds did not figure in the lists i saw for calcium sources, so this may be why. i was surprised, since almonds appear to be very good in other respects.Based on this theory Almonds are not good either because they are high in oxalates.http://www.whfoods.com/genpage.php?tname=george&dbid=48
I don't like spinach. After reading that article, i still don't like spinach. I am glad I have other sources of calcium.Apparently how problematic oxalates are in your personal health is related to whether you have a healthy level of oxalobacter formigenes in your microbiota makeup - it may be lacking in people susceptible to kidney stones etc:
http://aem.asm.org/content/68/8/3841.full
Thanks for sharing. I too have used ALA, and found a small lowering effect in bgl. it is available on scrip on the continent and is prescribed for peripheral neuropathy. Is is not accepted by NiCE.Hi There
It is true that I take Alpha Lipoic Acide, Benfotiamine and Methyl Cobolamine supplements in conjunction with LCHF principles, but my reasons for doing so are because I believe they help my problems with peripheral neuropathy.
What I did find though is that they also caused a reduction in my FBG levels, and if I stop taking them I see an immediate increase.
I think, although I do not know, that this is probably because my insulin resistance is possibly caused by an inability to properly metabolise vitamin B12 - something which would not be helped by the Metfornin I am prescribed.
I have been able to reduce my metformin from 4 x 500 mgr daily to 3, and briefly to 2.
I also tried L-Acetyl Carnitine as well, as I read it helps Alpha Lipoic Acid to work. Initially, this caused my FBG levels to fall further, but after about 2 weeks they started to rise again and my weight started to increase, so I've stopped taking that one and increased my Metformin back to 3.
I realise this doesn't address the atual question originally asked but I hope some one may find it interesting, or even useful.
Cheers
Tim
No Worries mate - happy to share any information I might have.Thanks @Tim55
Sorry to drag you into the conversation, I had a vague recollection, not the actual reasoning
A very good and well written report. I am going to have to read it a few times to make sure I understand it. Thank you for sharing it here. I certainly came away from my first pass feeling positive about its conclusions. What is interesting is that it is a report from a respected financial investment bank (I think thats still true) and is aimed at investors. it covers trends and changes in agric chemical land and hence how commodities are already being affected by this new 'technology'. This is serious stuff, and shows that this diet has far reaching effects for business and the money markets not just the health benefits.
It is a slightly quirky report though since it is difficult to see who the target audience is. it has a very high and specialised technical data content, way above the heads of the average businessman or financial investor. it could be aimed at HCP's, but what do they care about commodities? it could be aimed at the food manufacturers, but then they don't need the technical stuff at this level, Food retailers and the catering industry need the commodity trend data, but again not the nitty gritty techno speak.
I am baffled as to who Credit Suisse are aiming this report to? it does not detract from the content though which is well presented.
Thank you again for this, it is quite comprehensive.
Of course they do. But the report they produced is much much better than many I have viewed, and is well up to date with current research. If investors start telling their 'interests' to follow the bandwagon, then we should all benefit from the music. This report gives gravitas to our cause and is something worthwhile that we can print off for our HCP's to absorb and digest.Investors. Fat is the new sugar, and well worth a few investments here and there. More people are becoming convinced fat is healthy, Credit Suisse make money out of selling that image. A cynic would suggest they have the same relationship with that report as a drug company publishing trials of a drug they are keen to sell. But a shrewd investor would put money in both.
Wonder what they might say about statins? That could be interesting.They do a good one on sugar as well. Sweeteners are a good tip.
https://publications.credit-suisse....fm?fileid=780BF4A8-B3D1-13A0-D2514E21EFFB0479
It's a 2013 report, and seems to be an accurate prediction.
As to the quality, of course it's good. And any report telling people to carry on buying, or promoting trends for investment is normally well received, They do some good guides to speculative investing. I've done a few spread bets based on their reports, including the 'fat'
But these are sidelines to them , they spend a lot more promoting investment in pharmacy companies. And that usually makes money as well.
Wonder what they might say about statins? That could be interesting.
We had a 'discussion' in one of the other threads here that showed that there seems to be a gap in our understanding of what the Protein and Fat parts of the LCHF diet do. I certainly completed my LCHF training course, and came away with a large question mark about it, so had to do a load more research. i want to use this thread to discuss the role of protein and fat specifically and i think the LC part is well understood and is discussed already in the Low Carb threads.
I have put this as a discussion because i sincerely think it needs discussion, and also because there were those that felt that this topic should not be discussed in the Low Carb Forum. There were also those that felt it should not be discussed at all.
Has anyone got any good links to reports that describe how we metabolise protein and fat, and also shows how they differ in what they do?
I would also like to look at the safety side of this topic, since there are legitimate concerns in respect of heavy use of these, and take into account recent research findings that seem to turn established thinking upside down
Please join in.
You are safe from me. This is the purpose of my OP, to find out what lurks within.....I quoted your question, just to remind people of your last line.
New devolopment in the last few days.
http://news.mit.edu/2016/diet-influences-colon-cancer-0302
It's being well reported, google
'High-fat diet may make intestinal stem cells to become cancerous'
And apparently, the study was 'high fat' this time, not 'high fat, high calorie'
I'll keep my head down now.
...................You haven't put me off LCHF yet.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?