Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Off-Topic
General Chat
What was your fasting blood glucose? (full on chat)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HarryBeau" data-source="post: 2216913" data-attributes="member: 329049"><p>The CPS are so inconsistent [USER=493719]@jjraak[/USER] people on bail for years...very expensive trials abandoned because they got it wrong...charges levied when they never should be...grooming gangs allowed to abuse & trade young girls for years without any action...they have two criteria for charging 1) is there a reasonable prospect of securing a conviction 2) is it in the public interest... how they thought Caroline met the threshold test I have no idea...her boyfriend did not support the prosecution & disputed the facts they relied upon...unlikely they would have got a conviction...she was charged with battery otherwise known as common assault the most minor assault charge on the statute books which as a summary matter would have been limited to the Magistrates Court...yet we hear of 'blood' all over the place' extensive injuries very doubtful that was the case otherwise I would have expected the charges to be more serious ABH or GBH...something badly wrong there not just for Caroline Flack but all the others that have suffered as a result of the CPS's inadequacy and a reluctance to accept they do get it wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HarryBeau, post: 2216913, member: 329049"] The CPS are so inconsistent [USER=493719]@jjraak[/USER] people on bail for years...very expensive trials abandoned because they got it wrong...charges levied when they never should be...grooming gangs allowed to abuse & trade young girls for years without any action...they have two criteria for charging 1) is there a reasonable prospect of securing a conviction 2) is it in the public interest... how they thought Caroline met the threshold test I have no idea...her boyfriend did not support the prosecution & disputed the facts they relied upon...unlikely they would have got a conviction...she was charged with battery otherwise known as common assault the most minor assault charge on the statute books which as a summary matter would have been limited to the Magistrates Court...yet we hear of 'blood' all over the place' extensive injuries very doubtful that was the case otherwise I would have expected the charges to be more serious ABH or GBH...something badly wrong there not just for Caroline Flack but all the others that have suffered as a result of the CPS's inadequacy and a reluctance to accept they do get it wrong. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Off-Topic
General Chat
What was your fasting blood glucose? (full on chat)
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…