Yes two meters will almost certainly give different results, in fact if you immediately repeat a test using the same meter and the same drop of blood its entirely possible to get two different results.My question is can the two different meters give different reasults
All of the meters have to be manufactured to the same accuracy standard of plus/minus 15%, including the one your Dr usesAnyone know if there is any blood sugar meter that is more accurate to what GP tests?
Both of these results are well within the 15% margin of error, there is only a 0.5 mmol/l difference between the two. The meters really are not all that accurate, they just give us an idea of where our blood sugar isI did the measurements on both after dinner which came as 7.2 for Glucorx and 6.7 for GlucoNavi.
This doesn’t particularly mean that your meter is faulty, it just shows that for the last few days your levels have been slightly higher. Anything can affect our blood sugar levels, maybe you had a restless night or perhaps you have a cold brewing or are a little stressed over something. Food has the most impact on our blood sugar but almost everything we do or even think can cause our levels to change.Usually my morning blood sugar is always less than 6, but for past few days I can see the meter was giving more than 6.5 even without any high meals previous night.
Absolutely perfect, washing makes sure there is nothing on your fingers to give a false high,Also is there any procedure how to measure it? For example I wash my hands by soap and dry it with kitchen tissue before testing, do you think it's right approach to do?
Very nicely explained...Yes two meters will almost certainly give different results, in fact if you immediately repeat a test using the same meter and the same drop of blood its entirely possible to get two different results.
All of the meters have to be manufactured to the same accuracy standard of plus/minus 15%, including the one your Dr uses
Both of these results are well within the 15% margin of error, there is only a 0.5 mmol/l difference between the two. The meters really are not all that accurate, they just give us an idea of where our blood sugar is
The 6.7 result for example just tells you that your actual sugar level is anywhere between 6.0 to 7.5
This doesn’t particularly mean that your meter is faulty, it just shows that for the last few days your levels have been slightly higher. Anything can affect our blood sugar levels, maybe you had a restless night or perhaps you have a cold brewing or are a little stressed over something. Food has the most impact on our blood sugar but almost everything we do or even think can cause our levels to change.
Absolutely perfect, washing makes sure there is nothing on your fingers to give a false high,
And drying ensures there is no moisture to dilute the blood sample and cause a false low.
As per @catinahat & other replies.Hi,
I have been using GlucoNavi Blood sugar meter for past few years. Usually my morning blood sugar is always less than 6, but for past few days I can see the meter was giving more than 6.5 even without any high meals previous night.
So I recently bought another BG meter GlucoRx Nexus Blue. I did the measurements on both after dinner which came as 7.2 for Glucorx and 6.7 for GlucoNavi.
My question is can the two different meters give different reasults?
Anyone know if there is any blood sugar meter that is more accurate to what GP tests?
Also is there any procedure how to measure it? For example I wash my hands by soap and dry it with kitchen tissue before testing, do you think it's right approach to do?
Appreciate anyone replying to my message.
Regards
I also use a GlucoRx Nexus Blue and am always consistent in preparation for its use. Because of the variability I take at least 2 and sometimes up to 4 readings on each occasion and treat their average as “the result”. The typical deviation with my meter is about 0.6 but sometimes up to 1.0.Thanks for all your comments. Mine is around 20% difference.
This morning I tested with my old one which is GlucoNavi, the figure coming as 6.1, however with my new machine GlucoRx it comes as 7.3 a difference of 1.2 which I think is lot
Regards
Oh really, difference of 1 is still lot. Difficult to trust which one is giving correct results.I also use a GlucoRx Nexus Blue and am always consistent in preparation for its use. Because of the variability I take at least 2 and sometimes up to 4 readings on each occasion and treat their average as “the result”. The typical deviation with my meter is about 0.6 but sometimes up to 1.0.
The one your GP uses has the same accuracy, if you were to take both of your meters to the Dr and do. 3 tests, one with each of your meters and the Dr's, you would have 3 different results. All the results would be within the 15% plus or minus range of your actual glucose level.Oh really, difference of 1 is still lot. Difficult to trust which one is giving correct results.
Anyone know what brand does GP use? I can't remember when I visited them last time
+/- 15% of a 6 mmol result =7.06 and 5.1the figure coming as 6.1, however with my new machine GlucoRx it comes as 7.3 a difference of 1.2 which I think is lot
I like your analogy so much, it's really apt!!As per @catinahat & other replies.
The meters aren't entirely accurate...none of them are .
I read up when first on scene, & while I understand the need for pinpoint accuracy, I doubt any ever could offer that .
And given that many things can raise our BG, infections/illness being just one, it's a constant game of reading between the lines & deciding what is causing any recent rises (or lowerings )
The best I think we can hope for is a trend of numbers up or down to guide & help keep us safe.
I likened not knowing our testing numbers to being in a long corridor, In the dark trying not to hit the walls or trip over as we fumble our way along it.
The meter just shines a light so we know when we are close to the walls, and in danger of bumps & bruises ...aka making us stop & consider what might be causing it and what to avoid/ prepare for
If we follow the light (numbers) we can likely avoid too many hits over the forthcoming years .
Well, that's how I see it.
Others may have a different view .
Thank you @Monica_JJ .I like your analogy so much, it's really apt!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?