Robinredbreast
Oracle
- Messages
- 18,446
- Location
- Planet Earth
- Type of diabetes
- Type 1
- Treatment type
- Insulin
- Dislikes
- Bullies, Liars, Trolls and dishonest cruel people
I would like to see an accepted definition of hi carb, low carb, no carb etc etc as it is like a soft and hard Brexit at the moment, a little ambiguous on the detail.
So if we were to pose the question, what is low carb, we would probably see many different answers. In fact I think this has already been done.There are no binaries. It’s all sliding scales and twisting knobs. Much like this;
Yes. This encapsulates my thinking.I have said this so many times................... reduced carbs terminology, for me, is more except
Because most people have a different view point regarding what the number's are. Some find 50, too high, someone else, on the low side. It can be confusing and can cause ' fall out's' regarding the subject.
I prefer 'Reduced carbs' or even a 'Reduction in Carbs'
Yes. This encapsulates my thinking.
So if we were to pose the question, what is low carb, we would probably see many different answers. In fact I think this has already been done.
But I am suggesting there should be a sliding scale. Such as low, very low and next to nothing or something along those lines. I would hope that the NHS could kick it off and it be then used to help prescribe differing diets according to various (diabetic) needs.
I would like to see an accepted definition of hi carb, low carb, no carb etc etc as it is like a soft and hard Brexit at the moment, a little ambiguous on the detail.
But then should there be low and ultra low?There is an official definition on this site but it differs massively to what individuals class as low/medium/high. I think that is because people tend to tailor it to the amount of carbs they can balance with their own management.
How about Lorne Sausage?
I used to buy that stuff in Dundee by the 1foot slab.
It is indeed refreshing to hear from Type 1s who eat reasonably normally and manage to attain good BG control. To the diehard low carbers: Everything in moderation is fine.Normal!?
Well I eat what everyone else is eating in the house. Just I weigh mine out and count carbs. I will not shy away from anything. As long as I carb count correctly and give myself the correct amount of insulin then, the same as @Knikki, nothing is off limits
‘Reduced Carbs’ sounds just right to me.I have said this so many times................... reduced carbs terminology, for me, is more except
Because most people have a different view point regarding what the number's are. Some find 50, too high, someone else, on the low side. It can be confusing and can cause ' fall out's' regarding the subject.
I prefer 'Reduced carbs' or even a 'Reduction in Carbs'
There are no binaries. It’s all sliding scales and twisting knobs. Much like this;
I thought I had fairly good control but my 90 day average is 10.1 - I know I am over eating at present - enjoying mid morning snacks and tea and cake in the afternoon as well as 3 meals a day ! I do try to count carbs and take a correction dose to compensate.....and has good BS control?
Usually eat low carb but just fed up of it at the moment! Feeling a bit fed up with diabetes and just want a bit of normality back.
I do have a libre which helps.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?