Kevin do you live in a measured. manor ?
CAROL
That's what you get for not sharing.The Doughnuts made me feel sick
Sent from my iPhone using DCUK Forum mobile app
I bet you wish you hadn't started this now.Fairly, my wife would say I'm extremely focused leaning to selective obsession. But extremely laid back and relaxed about things I am not passionate about, hence the "measured"
Sent from my iPhone using DCUK Forum
Perhaps we should voluntarily title our new threads with our opinion, such as "Another misinformed article by a supposed expert" so that no-one misunderstands the motives behind the posts?@KevinPotts I agree I appreciate you picking out the gems I don't get time to pluck through.
I have no complaints but just be mindful I saw your post on the front page of the diabetes.co.uk website listing the new replys to threads. Yours was one of them.
This is the first impression of diabetes.co.uk.
I think they pop up on facebook too.
Maybe our new posts need vetting before going live like other website forums?
I'm not sure.
I know @KevinPotts thread was posted in good intentions.
Maybe us 'oldies' need a section for oldies debates. Or is that not the discussions section?
Me personally, I'd prefer to see @KevinPotts ' s thread, than not.
Posting something that goes against what the forum guidelines advocate is possibly misleading to newly diagnosed members. It should clearly be stated that the person posting it finds it counter productive. There are members here who oppose forum guidelines and go out of their way to say so. I find it misleading and I wonder why anyone not in agreement with the forum guidelines are members? It isn't enough to state it is freedom of speech. I didn't find Kevin's post to be misleading but I can see where the moderator is coming from but are ALL of the moderators thinking the same way?
Referendum? Do you really want to go there? We are a bit busy with a civil war at the moment.@KevinPotts
I'm sooooo glad you posted this when you did. We get the news about a day later down here, than the rest of Britain, so I only read the story today. I thought " that'll make an interesting topic/stir a few people up". Then I saw your title. Dodged a bullet there, I reckon.
By the way, anyone know what happened in the referendum?
If we only read what we like. We would become unrealistic and bias.
Thanks @KevinPotts .
I'm looking forward to your next find.
Indeed, though my comment was actually intended as tongue in cheek But one thing I was taught long ago is to "consider the source" - one of the most important things I ever learned, which to me when I remember to do so means avoiding wasting my time and getting het up by rejecting the liable to be misinformed ones. Though I will accept that sometimes being aware of misinformation can provide a suitable weapon to refute it.Or he is open minded and researches articles he comes across, but then gets wound up by the idiots and needs to share the angst?
Being slightly more cautious about raising my head above the parapet, I am referencing this controversial book review link within this thread
I can already sense those considering whether to load their 50 cal ammo, but whilst on the face of it I don't agree with the premise of the book, I'm going to buy it, as I have always been open to strong countervailing arguments.
I'll let you know what I think once I've fully digested it (forgive the pun)
Book Review - The Starch Solution
https://apple.news/Awv0_diyaQIu8hJyHvMojOA
That link is blocked by my work firewall - which usually means there are phishing like links, or banned things.
However, just a brief look at the author's biog is enough to convince me not to read it. Doctors who come up with a whole diet/lifestyle plan overnight without a LOT of research to back it up aren't ones I can be bothered to read. he's done a few, but with not brilliant overwhelming results and one at least was published in an alternative medicine journal so doesn't count. That's not how science moves on, that's how the individuals make money. Glory, fame and cash aren't the goals I want my doctors to have at the foremost of their minds.
Exactly so why would we take any notice of it. For those not diabetic or overweight why would they want to cut their carbsIt clearly isn't written from or aimed at a diabetic point of view.
Exactly so why would we take any notice of it. For those not diabetic or overweight why would they want to cut their carbs
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?