the_anticarb
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,045
- Dislikes
- Spiders, winter, bills, ignorance, prejudice
If you look at who DUK are in bed with, then they collaborated with TESCO on the recent diabetes advice book that they were able to give away to anyone requesting it. I read the book, and found it to be a reasonable unbiassed appraisal and not corrupted by commercial interests, I approve of this way of funding their charitable work.I know that some people will say that they are just trying to raise money and if that's the easiest/best way of raising money then they should just do that. But it doesn't sit well with me. I think it risks damaging the reputation of the charity. We are constantly being told that being overweight and eating sugary junky **** raises your risk of getting diabetes. Plus, any diabetics who would like to support Diabetes UK may exclude themselves from donating in this way as they won't be able to enjoy the prize! (I know a little choc is ok but who'd have the willpower to resist a big hamper of chocs in their house? I wouldn't!) So there must be lots of diabetics in tesco who see it and walk by.
But for me it's more about the message - let's raise money for a condition that is partly diet related (not wholly, but partly) by selling a big hamper of sugary food or a load of cakes.
It's not even like I see them with a raffle for anything else - they could easily do, say a hamper of toiletries, or smelly candles, or just a general tombola-thing with a number of items, possibly a few food related. But it's always sweets and cakes .Why? In my local tesco I heard a customer laughing at the DUK table and saying 'this is hilarious, love it!' It's turning diabetes into a joke with the local population many of whom will only become aware of DUK through their ridiculous tables in tesco.
Does anyone else think its...rather inappropriate?
Now you mention that they do testing, I finally get it... they are doing Glucose Tolerance Tests!!!If you look at who DUK are in bed with, then they collaborated with TESCO on the recent diabetes advice book that they were able to give away to anyone requesting it. I read the book, and found it to be a reasonable unbiassed appraisal and not corrupted by commercial interests, I approve of this way of funding their charitable work.
Also they are in bed with the NHS on the latest diabetes prevention education projecr that uses Eatwell#2 plate for dietary advice. I support the effort, but do not support their message.
Now we see the candy crash saga in Tesco stores. I do not use Tesco myself, so was unaware of this. it does seem to be a contradiction, and would appear to corrupt the message as you point out in your post, Having said that, it was by stopping by one of their tables in a supermarket car park that led me to being diagnosed as T2D since they were offering free glucose testing. This was also a collaboration between DUK and a local commercial interest. So although I do not think their sugarmarket sweep is not their best idea, i do not condemn ir since it does bring their work to the attention of the general public [who are not carb challenged, and who can be persuaded to make a donation as they pass.[
DUK has yet to catch up with us here on DCUK regarding LC diets. but otherwise they do provide support for the diabetic community in many ways, and do not receive governmenr funding. They have to prostitute themselves for the money. Its like the MacMillan stall in the local hospital outside the Oncology entrance, where the only leaflet they hand out is a 'How to make a donation' leaflet.
Have you written to them to complain?
I work for another charity, and one of my employees took a role with DUK so before she left I made sure to tell her what I really think - she works in a fundraising/partnerships role, hopefully she will pass it on. She may even be working on the Tesco partnership team.If you look at who DUK are in bed with, then they collaborated with TESCO on the recent diabetes advice book that they were able to give away to anyone requesting it. I read the book, and found it to be a reasonable unbiassed appraisal and not corrupted by commercial interests, I approve of this way of funding their charitable work.
Also they are in bed with the NHS on the latest diabetes prevention education project that uses Eatwell#2 plate for dietary advice. I support the effort, but do not support their message.
Now we see the candy crash saga in Tesco stores. I do not use Tesco myself, so was unaware of this. it does seem to be a contradiction, and would appear to corrupt the message as you point out in your post, Having said that, it was by stopping by one of their tables in a supermarket car park that led me to being diagnosed as T2D since they were offering free glucose testing. This was also a collaboration between DUK and a local commercial interest. So although I do not think their sugarmarket sweep is their best idea, i do not condemn ir since it does bring their work to the attention of the general public [who are not carb challenged, and who can be persuaded to make a donation as they pass.[
DUK has yet to catch up with us here on DCUK regarding LC diets. but otherwise they do provide support for the diabetic community in many ways, and do not receive governmenr funding. They have to prostitute themselves for the money. Its like the MacMillan stall in the local hospital outside the Oncology entrance, where the only leaflet they hand out is a 'How to make a donation' leaflet.
Have you written to them to complain?
A few months ago, I attended a lock DUK meeting where we had a presentation by the local DUK partnership and fundraising person.
During the Q&A/feedback slot I asked what influence they had on their environment during campaign and fundraising events in local stores. Having clarified that I thought in the immediate entrance was a great place to be (hard to miss or avoid, depending on your standpoint), but more the usually adjacent mountains of chocolate, biscuits or fizzy drinks on off that week.
Whilst we then had the "not everyone moderates their diet, but prefer to bolus appropriately", I explained that for 90% of the UK's diabetic population, being T2, and the vast majority of that not being MDI insulin dependent, those were not always healthy options for a happy, healthy, long-term outcome.
She then suggested that to be honest, Tesco pretty much do their own thing, with their charity being a very small adjunct to their activities (I get that completely), and DUK simply have to fit in with whatever is going on, often nationally, on any given day. I can also see that. I understand that product placement isn't a local option, it is decreed from high above, with store plans needing to remain compliant with that instruction.
On the topic of raffle prizes and the like, I see that a mixed hamper of an Easter egg, at Easter is going to be more popular than a nice joint of beef or a mega turkey.
It's very far from ideal, but my impression is if they want the Tesco money (some of which is of course being used to support Professor Taylor's Newcastle/Glasgow wider, longer study), then that's the price they must pay.
SunnyExpat I work for a charity and we have tombolas which are a mixture of all sorts of things - sweets, toiletries, books. Part of the fun is not knowing what you're going to get! Never seen one with cabbages in though!
For context, who would support Cancer Research raffling cigarettes because a lot of people smoke and they are a good fund raiser?
I know that some people will say that they are just trying to raise money and if that's the easiest/best way of raising money then they should just do that. But it doesn't sit well with me. I think it risks damaging the reputation of the charity. We are constantly being told that being overweight and eating sugary junky **** raises your risk of getting diabetes. Plus, any diabetics who would like to support Diabetes UK may exclude themselves from donating in this way as they won't be able to enjoy the prize! (I know a little choc is ok but who'd have the willpower to resist a big hamper of chocs in their house? I wouldn't!) So there must be lots of diabetics in tesco who see it and walk by.
But for me it's more about the message - let's raise money for a condition that is partly diet related (not wholly, but partly) by selling a big hamper of sugary food or a load of cakes.
It's not even like I see them with a raffle for anything else - they could easily do, say a hamper of toiletries, or smelly candles, or just a general tombola-thing with a number of items, possibly a few food related. But it's always sweets and cakes .Why? In my local tesco I heard a customer laughing at the DUK table and saying 'this is hilarious, love it!' It's turning diabetes into a joke with the local population many of whom will only become aware of DUK through their ridiculous tables in tesco.
Does anyone else think its...rather inappropriate?
As an ex smoker, this would have attracted my attention. However, it would depend on which brand was being raffled. If the Price is Right.... I would have had no qualms about that. Again, a prize like this would have limited appeal in terms of cachment area, so why would they reduce potential income. Hence the choccies.For context, who would support Cancer Research raffling cigarettes because a lot of people smoke and they are a good fund raiser?
Make people aware of diabetes, yes and this has been on the forum before, with many, but not all, complaining about the 'sweet content' of raffles, especially as diabetes type 2 is an epidemic and is so often in the media.
I find it quite farcical, surely there must be other alternatives? possibly gift vouchers, book tokens, a session in the Gym, money off vouchers for in store goods in a local Tesco branch ??
I don't feel a gym session is as appealing as a chocolate orange.
Gift vouchers possibly, but we all know they'll go on chocolate/alcohol/tobacco/take away food.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?