Bill Darwen
Newbie
- Messages
- 1
Perhaps what is even more important to check the total carbohydrate g per 100g food, not just sugar levels. "Carbs" are converted to glucose to be able to be absorbed into the bloodstream.I guess I'm not the only Diabetic to check the sugar content in new to me foods. For me, 5% or less is OK, and anything over10% is definitely not.Recently my local supermarket, Lidl, started to sell a range of Crownfield breakfast cereals one of which was 'Special Flakes with Red Fruit'. The traffic light label on the front of the box said the sugar content was 5% However, I noticed that it also said that a 30g serving contained 4.2g of sugar. 4.2g is not 5%of 30g. Strangely, on the side of the box a more detailed list said the sugar content per 100g was 13.9%! Somebody wasn't paying attention when the teacher explained ratios and percentages. Some of the Crownfield alternatives displayed the same error, some did not, so take care. I;m still waiting to hear if Lidl or Crownfield are going to correct this mistake.
I suspect they were paying very close attention and chose to be deliberately misleading. They got a sale because of it. I've seen ice cream claimed as "low in sugar - only 4g (iirc)" per 'portion' - when the relevant portion size was 11g, or less than two level teaspoons.I guess I'm not the only Diabetic to check the sugar content in new to me foods. For me, 5% or less is OK, and anything over10% is definitely not.Recently my local supermarket, Lidl, started to sell a range of Crownfield breakfast cereals one of which was 'Special Flakes with Red Fruit'. The traffic light label on the front of the box said the sugar content was 5% However, I noticed that it also said that a 30g serving contained 4.2g of sugar. 4.2g is not 5%of 30g. Strangely, on the side of the box a more detailed list said the sugar content per 100g was 13.9%! Somebody wasn't paying attention when the teacher explained ratios and percentages. Some of the Crownfield alternatives displayed the same error, some did not, so take care. I;m still waiting to hear if Lidl or Crownfield are going to correct this mistake.
I think the maths is correct, as 4.2g is 14% of 30g, but as @sgm14 said they are being very misleading in that less than 5% refers to a daily portion of 90g of sugar....I guess I'm not the only Diabetic to check the sugar content in new to me foods. For me, 5% or less is OK, and anything over10% is definitely not.Recently my local supermarket, Lidl, started to sell a range of Crownfield breakfast cereals one of which was 'Special Flakes with Red Fruit'. The traffic light label on the front of the box said the sugar content was 5% However, I noticed that it also said that a 30g serving contained 4.2g of sugar. 4.2g is not 5%of 30g. Strangely, on the side of the box a more detailed list said the sugar content per 100g was 13.9%! Somebody wasn't paying attention when the teacher explained ratios and percentages. Some of the Crownfield alternatives displayed the same error, some did not, so take care. I;m still waiting to hear if Lidl or Crownfield are going to correct this mistake.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?