It may seem like heresy to say this, but the Newcastle study does seem to be sending out false hopes to a large number of diabetics especially given only 7 out of the 11 participants showed a 'remission' from their diabetic symptoms and there's little information on what happened to those on the programme in the weeks and months following the trial.
I have to wonder if those for whom the Newcastle Diet works are not actually diabetic at all but just have high bg levels because of all the high carb food they eat. After all, if a person is morbidly obese then their calorific intake must be very high to maintain that weight and therefore maybe their pancreas just cannot produce enough insulin regardless of what condition it's in. Hence a sudden reduction in calorie intake, which results in a similarly large reduction in weight means that the pancreas now has the capacity to produce insulin to balance the glucose being eaten therefore their BG levels fall back into the non-diabetic range.
Perhaps someone with more knowledge about the Newcatsle Study can confirm if the researchers compared the C-peptide results for the trial patients with the results from a similar number of non-diabetics. I've searched for this information but have been unable to find it.
Yes I tend to agree. I gained false hope from it and was disappointed, but some have benefitted and I'm pleased for them.
I was thinking along the lines of your second paragraph when you replied, so that saved me the bother. Thanks. Although in my case once I was morbidly obese I managed to maintain that weight on around 1200 calories a day! - I did eat a lot of carbs and fat to get me there in the first place though.