Sorry slightly off topic. @mikej1973, I thought the CAA regs were roughly the same as dvla. I know you have to inform them but its not an issue unless you are on meds/insulin, especially if you are well controlled. So why should it be a problem and why should it cost you more cos of your diabetes?? Worried now in case you know something I've missed!!! Sue x
The rules have changed. If you're in the system then any new requirements will show up at your next medical. Basically the process has been changed because diabetes controlled by insulin or drugs that increase your chance of a hypo no longer disqualifies you from having a medical. However, the rules that determine if you can hold the medical now apply to all diabetics. Although the monitoring of blood sugar isn't requires If your diet only or on metformin.
However at each medical exam you now need to do a stress Ecg. Whether for a class one or class two medical. Which is about £600 a go. I think that is an annual requirement and may be every six months passed a certain age too.
Its great that a type 1 can now fly for a living, but the change in rules seems to have had an undesired consequence. Sometimes the caa fixes stuff. Sometimes if doesn't!
I thought you had to have an ECG anyway and it wasn't anything g to do with being diabetic or not!
Leaving aside the offensive word you used to describe anyone taking an annuity (which, incidentally I am surprised has been left in by whoever moderated and edited the post before I saw it), I do not know enough about annuities to comment on that point.It was a joke. The thousands of pounds it will cost me to stay licenced with the caa will more than offset an increase in annuity. And only a moron would take an annuity anyway.
Leaving aside the offensive word you used to describe anyone taking an annuity (which, incidentally I am surprised has been left in by whoever moderated and edited the post before I saw it), I do not know enough about annuities to comment on that point.
I have, however, heard of people who claim to have a debilitating, life limiting medical condition in order to claim early payment of enhanced pensions.
Thanks Mike, its actually after the age of 40, but its nothing to do with being a diabetic, everyone has to have one. To the best of my knowledge for class one the medical with ECG costs under £300 but again that's for anyone. As you are a well controlled by diet type two, Im sure you haven't got anything to worry about in regards to you diabetes and flying, and it shouldn't cost you any more for your license than anyone else. Sue xIt's initially and then not for sometime after. Maybe you're first medical after you are 50? It could even be 40. My last medical was before my 40th. Also it's a stress Ecg not a normal one. So you have to run fast on a treadmill first! It's all about the link between copd and diabetes and your likelihood off having a heart attack mid air!
The requirement has always been there. But only if you had 10% risk of a heart attack in 10 years. That sentence has been taken out of the requirements
Thanks Mike, its actually after the age of 40, but its nothing to do with being a diabetic, everyone has to have one. To the best of my knowledge for class one the medical with ECG costs under £300 but again that's for anyone. As you are a well controlled by diet type two, Im sure you haven't got anything to worry about in regards to you diabetes and flying, and it shouldn't cost you any more for your license than anyone else. Sue x
You don't claim to have a debilitating, Life limiting medical condition in order to claim early payment of enhanced pension? I don't know. But I could investigate for a consultancy fee.That's fair. Are you saying I don't? What do you know that my gp and consultant don't know? I'd be fascinated consultant Pipp
You don't claim to have a debilitating, Life limiting medical condition in order to claim early payment of enhanced pension? I don't know. But I could investigate for a consultancy fee.
Do you want a list of my consultancy charges?You don't claim anything. The form will say something like "do you have type 2 diabetes?" are suggesting I lie and say no?
Do you want a list of my consultancy charges?
Quite the contrary. I would have loved to have your type of "diabetes"!So your diabetes is better than my diabetes? Arf!
Quite the contrary. I would have loved to have your type of "diabetes"!
I think you'll find it's the delivery style, and place you've chosen to make it into an argument, rather than the content that's at issue. I think out of respect to the OP, if you really want to continue this, start your own thread to discuss the merits of various dietary approaches.Im just uncertain as to why that means my story and opinion holds less weight than anyone else's!
Can we get back on thread here!
perhaps a mod could fork the mikej1973 thread off! or @mikej1973 start his own.
CollieBoy beat me to it, I just hit reply to same the same.
I think you'll find it's the delivery style, and place you've chosen to make it into an argument, rather than the content that's at issue. I think out of respect to the OP, if you really want to continue this, start your own thread to discuss the merits of various dietary approaches.
Irony in the extreme.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?