• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

Exercise - surprising and exciting information

Bebo321

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,001
Location
Somerset
Type of diabetes
Family member
Treatment type
I do not have diabetes
I have been doing some more research for TeamBG (www.teambloodglucose.com) recently around using exercise to manage Type 2 diabetes. We all know that in theory it's a good thing, (I'm currently putting together a video to explain exactly why and how exercise helps manage blood glucose control). There has always been a bit of a debate around what sort of exercise you should do to get maximum effect and particularly what level of intensity you should exercise at though - so yes it's right to say that any exercise is good, but is it better to cycle full blast for ten minutes, or go for an hour's walk?.

Well I dug up this piece of research that I just had to share (and I'm terribly sorry if this has already been posted somewhere and I'm only just catching up!), because personally I think it is pretty groundbreaking in its implications.

The research tests exercise intensity and it's impact on various measurements such as blood glucose levels, VO2 max (so aerobic fitness), fat composition etc. What's interesting though is that the exercise focusses on WALKING.
I've perhaps been under the misconception that to really see the benefits of intensive exercise you need to get your running shoes on, take the mountain road on your bike, or get pumping iron until you're gasping for air. Apparently not - and this is what I find so exciting!

http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/36/2/228.full

This study took individuals and put them in a walking program - the notable comparisons for me are the 'Continuous walking' group, verses the 'Interval walking' group. Interval walking involved walking at a fast pace for three minutes, followed by slow pace walking for another three minutes.
I won't go into the detail of the number of hours walked, how long the study lasted etc, because in many respects it is irrelevant. The important thing to note is that just by combining fast and slow pace in a walk, the health benefits over just maintaining continuous moderate activity are nothing short of staggering!

Take a look at these charts:

Black denotes Interval Walking
Diagonals denotes Continous walking group
White denotes 'Control' group


Screen Shot 2016-02-09 at 13.50.43.pngScreen Shot 2016-02-09 at 13.52.19.pngScreen Shot 2016-02-09 at 13.51.56.png

Fat mass is reduced, insulin sensitivity goes up, more weight is lost, VO2max improves by 16.1 (that's huge!).

The thing I think that we can all take away from this is that we don't have to get running shoes on to get the benefits of intensive exercise. Just by varying the pace of our walk, our swim, our cycle on the exercise bike, our arm lifts etc and by mixing things up a little bit, we should actually enjoy more of the benefits from the exercise that we do. :)

Happy Days!
 
@Bebo321 - Get in touch with the guys at Swansea uni. They've done a ton of work on the impact of exercise and how it affects blood glucose in diabetics. It's fascinating.
 
I totally agree about exercise, if my BG spikes above 12 2 hours after eating I simply use the exercise bike for about half an hours hard pedalling to reduce my BG to about 8.
 
I have been doing some more research for TeamBG (www.teambloodglucose.com) recently around using exercise to manage Type 2 diabetes. We all know that in theory it's a good thing, (I'm currently putting together a video to explain exactly why and how exercise helps manage blood glucose control). There has always been a bit of a debate around what sort of exercise you should do to get maximum effect and particularly what level of intensity you should exercise at though - so yes it's right to say that any exercise is good, but is it better to cycle full blast for ten minutes, or go for an hour's walk?.

Well I dug up this piece of research that I just had to share (and I'm terribly sorry if this has already been posted somewhere and I'm only just catching up!), because personally I think it is pretty groundbreaking in its implications.

The research tests exercise intensity and it's impact on various measurements such as blood glucose levels, VO2 max (so aerobic fitness), fat composition etc. What's interesting though is that the exercise focusses on WALKING.
I've perhaps been under the misconception that to really see the benefits of intensive exercise you need to get your running shoes on, take the mountain road on your bike, or get pumping iron until you're gasping for air. Apparently not - and this is what I find so exciting!

http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/36/2/228.full

This study took individuals and put them in a walking program - the notable comparisons for me are the 'Continuous walking' group, verses the 'Interval walking' group. Interval walking involved walking at a fast pace for three minutes, followed by slow pace walking for another three minutes.
I won't go into the detail of the number of hours walked, how long the study lasted etc, because in many respects it is irrelevant. The important thing to note is that just by combining fast and slow pace in a walk, the health benefits over just maintaining continuous moderate activity are nothing short of staggering!

Take a look at these charts:

Black denotes Interval Walking
Diagonals denotes Continous walking group
White denotes 'Control' group


View attachment 17662View attachment 17663View attachment 17664

Fat mass is reduced, insulin sensitivity goes up, more weight is lost, VO2max improves by 16.1 (that's huge!).

The thing I think that we can all take away from this is that we don't have to get running shoes on to get the benefits of intensive exercise. Just by varying the pace of our walk, our swim, our cycle on the exercise bike, our arm lifts etc and by mixing things up a little bit, we should actually enjoy more of the benefits from the exercise that we do. :)

Happy Days!
Very encouraging.
 
Thanks Bebo321
I mainly walk due to worn out knees. I'm going to try this
 
Thanks for this Bebo, a really interesting and encouraging post. I know that I reduce my bg levels after my (brisk) walks so I can now try the interval stuff. Happy days indeed !!
 
This article reminded me of the walk I once took between Taos, New Mexico, and the Peublo Indian village some way off. I was escorted there by a Pueblo Indian who had what seemed to me a very unusual way of walking - we walked faster and faster, then gradually slowed down to snail's pace, then up to top speed again , then down, then up and so on.. I asked him about this and he said it was the best way to walk long distances. Looks familiar? :)
 
I have been doing some more research for TeamBG (www.teambloodglucose.com) recently around using exercise to manage Type 2 diabetes. We all know that in theory it's a good thing, (I'm currently putting together a video to explain exactly why and how exercise helps manage blood glucose control). There has always been a bit of a debate around what sort of exercise you should do to get maximum effect and particularly what level of intensity you should exercise at though - so yes it's right to say that any exercise is good, but is it better to cycle full blast for ten minutes, or go for an hour's walk?.

Well I dug up this piece of research that I just had to share (and I'm terribly sorry if this has already been posted somewhere and I'm only just catching up!), because personally I think it is pretty groundbreaking in its implications.

The research tests exercise intensity and it's impact on various measurements such as blood glucose levels, VO2 max (so aerobic fitness), fat composition etc. What's interesting though is that the exercise focusses on WALKING.
I've perhaps been under the misconception that to really see the benefits of intensive exercise you need to get your running shoes on, take the mountain road on your bike, or get pumping iron until you're gasping for air. Apparently not - and this is what I find so exciting!

http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/36/2/228.full

This study took individuals and put them in a walking program - the notable comparisons for me are the 'Continuous walking' group, verses the 'Interval walking' group. Interval walking involved walking at a fast pace for three minutes, followed by slow pace walking for another three minutes.
I won't go into the detail of the number of hours walked, how long the study lasted etc, because in many respects it is irrelevant. The important thing to note is that just by combining fast and slow pace in a walk, the health benefits over just maintaining continuous moderate activity are nothing short of staggering!

Take a look at these charts:

Black denotes Interval Walking
Diagonals denotes Continous walking group
White denotes 'Control' group


View attachment 17662View attachment 17663View attachment 17664

Fat mass is reduced, insulin sensitivity goes up, more weight is lost, VO2max improves by 16.1 (that's huge!).

The thing I think that we can all take away from this is that we don't have to get running shoes on to get the benefits of intensive exercise. Just by varying the pace of our walk, our swim, our cycle on the exercise bike, our arm lifts etc and by mixing things up a little bit, we should actually enjoy more of the benefits from the exercise that we do. :)

Happy Days!
. Any suggestions for me, I'm disabled in my legs so walking only very short distances are possible, I have a bike in my lounge so should I go fast or slow? Any ideas?
Any help most welcome and appreciated. Thanks
 
. Any suggestions for me, I'm disabled in my legs so walking only very short distances are possible, I have a bike in my lounge so should I go fast or slow? Any ideas?
Any help most welcome and appreciated. Thanks
Hi there,
Well logically what this research implies is that just by varying your pace you will achieve better results than just maintaining a moderate pace. This particular plan combines 3min fast walking with 3min slow. You may not be able to maintain 3min fast pace on a bike, so just do say 20 to 30 seconds at a fast pace (or whatever you can manage) followed by 30 seconds recovery and then repeat. As your fitness improves you may want to extend the amount of time you cycle at a faster pace. You're the best judge of what you can manage - the main thing is to remember to mix it up a bit and try to have a bit of fun (hopefully!)
 
This article reminded me of the walk I once took between Taos, New Mexico, and the Peublo Indian village some way off. I was escorted there by a Pueblo Indian who had what seemed to me a very unusual way of walking - we walked faster and faster, then gradually slowed down to snail's pace, then up to top speed again , then down, then up and so on.. I asked him about this and he said it was the best way to walk long distances. Looks familiar? :)
That's interesting - I've not heard of that strategy for covering large distances.:)
 
Hi there,
Well logically what this research implies is that just by varying your pace you will achieve better results than just maintaining a moderate pace. This particular plan combines 3min fast walking with 3min slow. You may not be able to maintain 3min fast pace on a bike, so just do say 20 to 30 seconds at a fast pace (or whatever you can manage) followed by 30 seconds recovery and then repeat. As your fitness improves you may want to extend the amount of time you cycle at a faster pace. You're the best judge of what you can manage - the main thing is to remember to mix it up a bit and try to have a bit of fun (hopefully!)
Thanks very much. Will try but not easy got leg /ankle deformity But good to know. This is great site we learn something every day. Has helped me no end since joining diabetes site. Thanks good health to you all
 
It seems that I hit on the right combination by accident. There are a variety of walks including some interval walks available on utube. They become quite addictive, are free, can be done whatever the weather plus I know I will feel better after completing one.
 
I have been having trouble with high morning readings, pre bed 6.5 and morning 10-11. This morning I slept through my alarm and had to rush to work. I walk and it's about a mile. After alternately hurtling along and slowing to recover my breath I took a reading at my destination and to my surprise it was 9.1. Maybe it's a coincidence but I think I'll do a little experimenting on the basis of this thread. Thanks for the info.
 
I have been having trouble with high morning readings, pre bed 6.5 and morning 10-11. This morning I slept through my alarm and had to rush to work. I walk and it's about a mile. After alternately hurtling along and slowing to recover my breath I took a reading at my destination and to my surprise it was 9.1. Maybe it's a coincidence but I think I'll do a little experimenting on the basis of this thread. Thanks for the info.
That's great to know - thanks for feeding back. It would be nice to keep tabs to see if this was just a coincidence or if it can add another layer of evidence to the study.:)
 
I have been doing some more research for TeamBG (www.teambloodglucose.com) recently around using exercise to manage Type 2 diabetes. We all know that in theory it's a good thing, (I'm currently putting together a video to explain exactly why and how exercise helps manage blood glucose control). There has always been a bit of a debate around what sort of exercise you should do to get maximum effect and particularly what level of intensity you should exercise at though - so yes it's right to say that any exercise is good, but is it better to cycle full blast for ten minutes, or go for an hour's walk?.

Well I dug up this piece of research that I just had to share (and I'm terribly sorry if this has already been posted somewhere and I'm only just catching up!), because personally I think it is pretty groundbreaking in its implications.

The research tests exercise intensity and it's impact on various measurements such as blood glucose levels, VO2 max (so aerobic fitness), fat composition etc. What's interesting though is that the exercise focusses on WALKING.
I've perhaps been under the misconception that to really see the benefits of intensive exercise you need to get your running shoes on, take the mountain road on your bike, or get pumping iron until you're gasping for air. Apparently not - and this is what I find so exciting!

http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/36/2/228.full

This study took individuals and put them in a walking program - the notable comparisons for me are the 'Continuous walking' group, verses the 'Interval walking' group. Interval walking involved walking at a fast pace for three minutes, followed by slow pace walking for another three minutes.
I won't go into the detail of the number of hours walked, how long the study lasted etc, because in many respects it is irrelevant. The important thing to note is that just by combining fast and slow pace in a walk, the health benefits over just maintaining continuous moderate activity are nothing short of staggering!

Take a look at these charts:

Black denotes Interval Walking
Diagonals denotes Continous walking group
White denotes 'Control' group


View attachment 17662View attachment 17663View attachment 17664

Fat mass is reduced, insulin sensitivity goes up, more weight is lost, VO2max improves by 16.1 (that's huge!).

The thing I think that we can all take away from this is that we don't have to get running shoes on to get the benefits of intensive exercise. Just by varying the pace of our walk, our swim, our cycle on the exercise bike, our arm lifts etc and by mixing things up a little bit, we should actually enjoy more of the benefits from the exercise that we do. :)

Happy Days!
Wow - saw the headline and had to read - this is huge.
Type 2 since Oct 2015
fanatical about diet and exercise
weight loss so far 90lbs (and 10 inches off the waist)
Walked the Loch Ness marathon (7hrs 24) and fanatical about measuring. I'm a science graduate
And I have my own gym - and treadmill!

I'm going to try this interval walking starting on Saturday morning. I will let you know my results at the end of each week
 
Wow - saw the headline and had to read - this is huge.
Type 2 since Oct 2015
fanatical about diet and exercise
weight loss so far 90lbs (and 10 inches off the waist)
Walked the Loch Ness marathon (7hrs 24) and fanatical about measuring. I'm a science graduate
And I have my own gym - and treadmill!

I'm going to try this interval walking starting on Saturday morning. I will let you know my results at the end of each week
Brilliant!:joyful:
 
Back
Top