Well I know someone who has just been appointed as a clinical champion raising the bar for inpatient diabetes care. I was also involved many years ago before I was even diagnosed myself with the building of a purpose built diabetes centre near me, my involvement was in memory of many family members of mine who died too young mostly due to complications. DUK were and still are heavily involved within the centre and are perfectly accessible for members of the public and this is evidenced by what's available in the diabetes centre. 're low carb not quite what I said. I said that obviously there is a place for low carb but LONG TERM evidence in terms of decent quality research is not available so DUK/NHS wouldn't recommend that until that evidence is there. Speaking to a friend of mine who works both NHS (specialist nurse) and DUK (clinical champion) I asked her this very question. Her view was partly due to lack of long term evidence. Short term evidence is promising but just suppose in the long term depriving yourself of carbs causes other long term damage of which we are currently unaware? Can you imagine the lawsuits that would follow if the NHS/DUK had been advising these diets without knowing the long term effects. The other point was that lifestyle is the hardest thing to change and possibly only has few as 5% of type 2 patients would stick to the diet therefore it's a case of damage limitation and advising people to make healthier food choices. After all carbs have been around.forever. in the 2nd world war for example, meals were largely carb based without a huge increase in type 2. Therefore it's all down to education, reducing processed foods, not eating fast food and general **** that their guidelines are based around. My mate goes to regular conferences and thinks that low carb may Well be recommended though there appear to be issues around very low carb. As I don't eat very low carb because I hated it so much I didn't question her further on what issues but I can find out.I see that the list of current sponsors funding DUK has already been posted in this thread. This is listed on their main site, so they are proud of their connections to the food and drug companies. They are funded by these interested parties, You seem to be living in La-La Land if you think that there really are no strings attached to that funding.
I live 6 miles away from the Regional Office of DUK. When I es DX'ed I wanted to join in with them and gain information and advice from them, but they do not hold any User Group meetings within 40 miles of me, not even in their town which is the regional centre too. They hold no seminars or training courses for users, BUT DO hold fund raising events, and once a year put on an exhibition in a local supermarket. Apart from the fundraisers, I see no presence in this area, with not a single poster in my GP surgery, or at the local hospital notice boards. My local library has no info or posters either. So in reality I find it dissicult to relate to their activities (or lack of same) so for this diabetic they are a waste of time. I am sad that they habe closed their minds to all the recent research that has been published, and seem unable to move forward from where they were 15 years ago. You say that the diet is unproven and lacks formal evidence. My diet was used in the early 1900's as the only successful way ti treat T1D before insulin was discovered, and it is still in use today for treating epilepsy. It is not a new fangled fad, it has a proven track record as a medically accepted treatment until the recent HCLF advice turned nutrition on its head in the 1980's That and the great strides being made by the food and drug industries.