Up front, I've taken a double Pfizer twice and had asymptomatic positive test in December (sad that I have to say that) but like
@Jim Lahey and
@bulkbiker, I am pro choice, not coercion particularly on spurious moral grounds and rather sceptical of this vaccine's performance and of all the non pharmaceutical interventions taken which were known to be damaging but were implemented without any certainty that they would improve public health in general.
As we come out of this there are a bunch of us who never bought the story, others who complied but didn't believe it, still more who were scared but had to get on with it anyway (the non Zoom class) and the CEV plus some who are pathologically anxious that after this Thursday we will suddenly be back to early 2020 with exponential spread when we should be able to trust each other to not go and visit a frail or anxious person when we are spiking a fever or just have a nasty cold.
Pfizer has now created its own pricey version of ivermectin which is a good option for those with no natural or vaccine immunity. Its been patented so will be a profitable line for them just as their vaccine sales boom has peaked (share prices now dipping). this is available to the CEV population along with priority testing but merely being anxious because you've got asthma or diabetes doesn't qualify you to be in that group. Luckily as it is a very expensive drug.
Re death spikes post vaccine. It isn't just that the vaccine went to the elderly who are at risk anyway but that for 2 weeks after the dose, your immune system is weakened. So you may be safer when you get to the other side of No Man's Land but you still have to get across the minefield.
I can see little reason to vaccinate a healthy under 50 year old but that is a personal choice and I took it because I am not healthy as type 1. Those of you that have reversed their diabetes via diet and with a good vitamin D level , non obese etc. are surely in a low risk category where deciding not to take it is still reasonable.
So I am glad that Boris's recent decisions have been vindicated compared to the more despotic regimes I don't ever want my government to keep me 'safe' from a virus with an ifr of 0.15% or less (Omricon) and won't wear a mask as a courtesy to the anxious ( I don't think I am helping you by pretending to believe in your irrational fear of transmission and that it is being prevented by a face decoration) and won't be testing again even if work have told us to continue doing so and to take our 5 days' isolation (total Skivers' charter).
What would you all like to use the £2billon monthly test n trace cost to be used on instead btw?