Interesting, I'm pleased you added "according to the US News". I wish there was such a thing, guaranteed to work for all. There wouldn't be any problems if there was such a thing. You finished on the proper answer, eat to your meter, it doesn't lie, well, it shouldn't lie. LOL We are all so very different, it seems to me that you just have to keep looking until you find something that suits you. Using the meter is a great advantage IMHO.Well according to US News.
http://health.usnews.com/best-diet
Obviously, I'm sure we'll all argue with their results.
Diabetes specific
http://health.usnews.com/best-diet/best-diabetes-diets
But it shows the size of the problems poor diet is causing overall, particularly when you look at the rankings, and the specific categories that the range of diets have been targeted at.
I'm still going to eat to my meter.
Very like thatYes, Eat to your Meter is always good advice. It is important to know why anyone wants to diet as a non-diabetic might want to focus just on weight whereas a diabetic must focus on blood sugar and might also need to reduce weight as well? As usual I will always look for scientific evidence and this is normally sadly lacking or statistically weak with most of these news reports. This is why in my posts I normally advise against any 'named' diet and focus on starting by reducing the carbs as there is plenty of scientific evidence that it helps with BS. We may all argue the amount of carb reduction or the mix of fat, protein and other ingredients and what is best for weight reduction. Portion size as always matters and The Meter is the final scientific measure for BS
I had a quick look at the recommended diabetic diets and one of them (the Engine 2 diet) has a whopping 70% of its calories from carbs!! On what planet is that a good option for the majority of diabetics (or anyone else for that matter)?