- Messages
- 2,394
- Type of diabetes
- I reversed my Type 2
- Treatment type
- Diet only
I would say for type 2's that are non - insulin dependant or use oral medication, I have not seen on this site anyone with "normal" range blood glucose control and or HbA1c results
This reinforces Diabetes UK’s call for an individualised approach to diet, taking into consideration peoples personal preferences
Vegetarian and vegan does not need to be high carb. I have been enjoying non-diabetic levels on 2 regular Met a day for 3.5 years as a vegan and previously as a vegetarian. I probably eat more carbs than many here (I don't count them), but I am starting to believe that there is more to low carbing than just going as low as possible. I tolerate more carbs these days and suspect it has to do with improved guts from eating plant only and a drop in inflammation from omitting dairy.I would say for type 2's that are non - insulin dependant or use oral medication, I have not seen on this site anyone with "normal" range blood glucose control and or HbA1c results (I haven't researched vegan or vegetarian enough to know what the results are under these protocols). I have seen on YouTube claims of reversing diabetes with high carb, but in my opinion this seems counter intuitive to fix a high glucose issue with high glucose.
My journey has shown LCHF seems the dominant longer term way to get consistent great control. The standard method of eating either in Europe or America has enough 30 to 40 year evidence to indicate a complete failure for both diabetics and based on the amount of obese, insulin resistant and pre-diabetics members of the general public. I am happy to continue LCHF and once a year fight to get a full blood count.
Diet for diabetics is a complex series of variables from one individual to another. You can only detail a guideline to what is required and let people find their own happy medium."But there is no consistent evidence that a low-carb diet is any more effective than other approaches in the long term, so it shouldn't be seen as the diet for everyone."
I don't have any particular axe to grind, so my comments are purely anecdotal and prove nothing one way or the other. I have a cousin and a father who are both insulin dependent type II diabetics and both with awful BG control. Possibly coincidence but both eat exactly what they want to. My father's poor control is probably because of his love of chocolate and as a 90 year old who has been skinny all his life I'm not going to lecture him on the benefits of low carb for some.
I take on board the statement that low carb could be injurious to the health and growth of children, so let's coin a new term "less carb".
So will my GP prescribe a meter and strips now.
Di
Diet for diabetics is a complex series of variables from one individual to another. You can only detail a guideline to what is required and let people find their own happy medium.
To be fair to them as you cannot prove it as no long term evidence (in the 3 year impact) so they have to be carefully cautious.
I take on board the statement that low carb could be injurious to the health and growth of children, so let's coin a new term "less carb".
It probably boils down to no one has done the research in that topic yet. Or if they are doing it, it hasn't been completed or been running long enough. Just a pure guess.To be fair to us T2D... They have been around for decades...and low carb have been available for even longer...but there is no data available long term evidence for low carb? It seriously begs the question why. But yes it is a significant small step.