Today I went into work and there was a buzz about the office due to people getting a pay rise, and quite a substantial one. After checking my pay slip, I discovered that I was not getting one. I was not the only person, a lady who has recently beaten Cancer and is now in remission and a lady with Fibromyalgia on my team were also given the bad news.
Understandably we were confused as this a performance based annual bonus and so I checked with My Team Leader who states that absences now contribute to the decision as to wether we get a rise or not. Within the last 12 months I have had two periods of absence. The first one was 1 day due to a hypo and feeling generally awful and the second was for 4 days due to being hospitalised due to a serious kidney infection and unmanageable high glucose levels. All together I have had 5 days sickness in the last year.
If I did not have diabetes, I would not have had any absence. I don't see five days absence, even for a healthy person as being excessive.
I was told that HR had informed management that I was not to be given the rise due to my absence. I understand rise's are discretionary, but I can't help but feel annoyed that this has happened especially when there are people in my office who have been off for a longer amount of time, but still have received the rise.
Do you think I and others with these underlying conditions are being discriminated against? Any support would be appreciated
Understandably we were confused as this a performance based annual bonus and so I checked with My Team Leader who states that absences now contribute to the decision as to wether we get a rise or not. Within the last 12 months I have had two periods of absence. The first one was 1 day due to a hypo and feeling generally awful and the second was for 4 days due to being hospitalised due to a serious kidney infection and unmanageable high glucose levels. All together I have had 5 days sickness in the last year.
If I did not have diabetes, I would not have had any absence. I don't see five days absence, even for a healthy person as being excessive.
I was told that HR had informed management that I was not to be given the rise due to my absence. I understand rise's are discretionary, but I can't help but feel annoyed that this has happened especially when there are people in my office who have been off for a longer amount of time, but still have received the rise.
Do you think I and others with these underlying conditions are being discriminated against? Any support would be appreciated