Nicole T
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 334
- Type of diabetes
- Treatment type
- Diet only
Oops!Well, this is depressing, if true. So, are you saying that despite going from my highest (65) back down to 37 in the normal range within 4 months of diagnosis... and if I continue to manage my bg levels well going forward, I am still going to see diabetic complications? I mean, I understand that being diagnosed with T2D is a serious thing, but was I (am I) being foolish for thinking that maybe my hard work had undone the damage so long as I stick to my new and improved diet and lifestyle? If complications/deterioration is inevitable, are we all just fighting to delay the inevitable?
A last minute edit that I threw in without thinking about it. I should have made it clear I was talking about age rather than HbA1c levels. While HbA1c isn't definitive, it's good enough for the medical profession to use it as their main diagnosis tool. I'd say that if you can keep it in the non-diabetic range, you're probably doing as well as anyone who's operating at the higher end of that range, but not high enough to receive a formal diagnosis,
I was just trying to say that there's not much point worrying ourselves over every little risk we take with respect to letting our blood sugar spike from time to time, when we're not going to live forever anyway. No doubt a few things will race to finally see me off. I just don't want diabetes to win.