On Wednesday I have a diabetic review. I had a disaster at the end of August - pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, weeks in hospital etc etc. At that point my BG was very high because I had thought I had bronchitis and had been dosing myself with honey and lemon, benylin etc. Since I left hospital I've been very strictly following the dietdoctor method of lchf. My non-diabetic wife deserves a medal, as she has been following their meal pattern too. Of course the diet has brought my BG down, but there are limits, it seems. My BG rarely falls below 7 and is usually between 7 and 8.3, except on waking when it can be 9. I've been at the gym three times a week and riding a bike. I'm not taking meds, except warfarin for the embolism.
Of course the diabetic nurse will rely on hba1c, which may well be okay. But I'm not really happy with where the BG levels are - they were better before I got ill. I know some of you are obviously quite expert on this stuff so wonder if anyone would like to comment on this pattern. I'd like to have my own thoughts clear before the review and, if I'm to be frank, am not entirely confident about the medical practice's approach to diabetes which seems to be 'one size fits all' among the nurses and relative ignorance among the GPs. They will listen to me, in fairness, but they are burdened with the usual NHS confusion about T2.
Of course the diabetic nurse will rely on hba1c, which may well be okay. But I'm not really happy with where the BG levels are - they were better before I got ill. I know some of you are obviously quite expert on this stuff so wonder if anyone would like to comment on this pattern. I'd like to have my own thoughts clear before the review and, if I'm to be frank, am not entirely confident about the medical practice's approach to diabetes which seems to be 'one size fits all' among the nurses and relative ignorance among the GPs. They will listen to me, in fairness, but they are burdened with the usual NHS confusion about T2.