Personally i don't see LC diet as a diet any more, it's simply a way of life that is easy for me to maintain and I am healthier for it and will continue with it. Looking back as a child it's what we ate anyway. Fruit was a treat and rarely if ever did we eat sugary foods or carbs to the point we are eating them today. Processed foods and the list goes on we never even heard about . My father God rest his soul, lived to 90 on very high fat and little carbs. He grew all our own foods, so i am simply doing what was done as a child. It isn't a diet it's a life style. That's my take on it for what it's worth.
This was discussed in another thread the other day, and that was the conclusion reached. The lecturer it seems comes from Harvard, that well known fount of whole grain plant based rhetoric. Boston is in the midst of the Grain Belt I believe and a lot of people lives are involved in that foodstuff supply chain. Dr Aseem Malhotra is spitting feathers over this, and he is an eminent Cardiologist here in the UK.What a load of rubbish.
Going back to the information source is actually quite interesting....
https://www.escardio.org/The-ESC/Pr...ydrate-diets-are-unsafe-and-should-be-avoided
Claims to be unfunded research.
As I posted earlier, this lecture is referring to a meta study of 2010 at which time the main LC diet around would probably be Atkins#1 which was the low carb high protein high fat diet referred to. The original Atkins diet did suffer a lot of adverse publicity and several law suits that they survived on a technicality, but it crippled the organisation for a while, They are back now with a new protocol that is very similar to LCHF but with an upper limit to protein intake and a higher fat intake that was missing in #1. Also they sell the foodstuffs already prepared and so keep better control. LCHF is very much do it yourself from scratch, but is a newcomer in terms of popularity (in its metamorphosis from Banting). So we may be looking at LC diets now in keto terms, but Atkins was the first kid on the publicity podium, so it got sniped at by everyone.Nothing against unfunded research per se - it could indicate that corporate sponsors are not dictating the agenda.
What I am still looking for is a definition of how much carbohydrate is included in the fourth quartile which is reported as being the highest risk.
2 strokes using Eatwell at the time. No further development (twitch, twitch... fall down.)Yep!
The proof is in the eating.
What do we say?
We ARE the research.
Any heart attacks, strokes etc whilst low carbing....... anyone?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?