Not an answer to your question ... just another question (sorry)
I'm intrigued to understand why you are only looking at what goes in and have not suggested increasing the calories out (as your title suggested) with exercise.
I appreciate this may not be an option for everyone but it is the approach I adopt to maintain my weight and often wondered why there is such a great focus on diet rather than a combination of diet and exercise.
Just curious.
If a person reduces carbs WITHOUT increasing protein and fat, they will automatically have reduced their calories. By contrast, a person like me who is drastically UNDER weight needs to increase protein and fat to compensate for the missing carbs/calories, (as does anyone who just wants to stay at a stable weight). Personally I find this difficult, as too much fat and I feel sick, and too much protein is probably not healthy. My only solution, which isn't really one, is to muddle through eating very low carb because my meter tells me to, and eating as much other stuff as I feel comfortable with. When I read recommendations to consume eg 90% fat, I do wonder how many people can actually tolerate this, and also whether it can possibly be healthy nutritionally.So, I guess my main question is, when somebody is wanting to lose weight, should it not be pushed to reduce carbs, but also to reduce calories, rather than some posts I have seen that you can eat a large amount of fat?
That sounds pretty good!No problem, and what has led me to asking and questioning these things is my exercise ratio is more than a lot of people. I am minimum hitting 14,000 steps a day on regular days, and on other upward of 20,000, adding in some weight training and have been very low carb.
This is why we talk about grass fed butter and beef, organic coconut oil and free range chicken etc...When I read recommendations to consume eg 90% fat, I do wonder how many people can actually tolerate this, and also whether it can possibly be healthy nutritionally.
Hi Joe,So, I guess my main question is, when somebody is wanting to lose weight, should it not be pushed to reduce carbs, but also to reduce calories, rather than some posts I have seen that you can eat a large amount of fat?
That is the macro for fat you don't eat 90% of your foods as fat you eat 90% of the calories in your food from fat (well not many people do in fact most aim for between 70-80% of calories from fat). As fat is about twice the calorific value of protein and carbs you just need to check which foods have a higher fat to protein to carb ratio. Avocado for example per 100g is 19.9g fat 1.9g carb 1.9g proteinWhen I read recommendations to consume eg 90% fat, I do wonder how many people can actually tolerate this, and also whether it can possibly be healthy nutritionally.
Hi Joe,
You have just set yourself up for the calorie is not a calorie argument.
But you are right reducing the amount (not calories) should give better results as long as your talking about how the body stores fat and the effects of insulin in this process.
Keto is tapping into the body's ability to burn fat for energy, both stored fat and what you eat. Thus reducing the body's insulin response trying to take what we put in and send it to the liver to turn into fat.
This is where a lot of us do not bother to count calories its not how much you eat its what you eat. Fat triggers the lowest insulin response so you can eat more as a portion than if you did with counting the calories because calorie counting assumes that your body treats everything the same.
To trigger the best response in losing weight the the less you feed your body the more it has to tap into its own fuel reserves Body Fat so counting calories is a good indication as to the amount you put on your plate and some people find that very helpful in controlling the amount they eat.
But the argument works just as well in the opposite direction eat more of the right stuff feel fuller for longer and you don't need to eat as much/ as often.
I completely agree with you.Like my scenario, changing it up may in fact help me.
And I'd throw up, so then all my %s would be reset to zero! I take your point, but it still sounds like far too much fat for me.So if you just ate avocados you'd be having a diet of 92% calories from fat with no extra added fat needed at all.
Why would you throw up (or is it because you don't like avocados?)And I'd throw up, so then all my %s would be reset to zero! I take your point, but it still sounds like far too much fat for me.
Maybe try adding in some extra protein too? You are exercising a lot so will probably be burning through it. You're pretty young so I really don't think calories will be a problem for you although I have read your other posts and understand to some extent your other concerns.I have kept my carbs in the keto range <20g over the last couple of days before trying to add in a little more. Yesterday I felt pretty dreadful at times with what seemed like a migraine. I hadn't been sleeping well either with high alerts, low alerts etc (most of the time compression issues on the sensor). Surprisingly, last night I think was my best nights sleep in a while.
I'm thinking i'm not getting enough food. Even if it means i'll maintain weight (i'm actually kind of happy at my current weight and build), I think i'll add in some more food. I'll keep it clean though, so more courgette, another egg, slim rice at 7 calories per pack and a little low carb sauce. This will hopefully make me feel fuller for longer and not massive calories so not gain weight.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?