How is fat the real danger to a diabetic - it doesn’t raise bgl. Carbs do.
How so?To clarify, I'm not suggesting either fat or carbs are the problem. It is the combination of the two, at certain levels, that can be dangerous.
Speaking as an ex-carboholic
How so?
This isn’t reflecting the experience of many who post on here and I’d like to understand this view
To clarify, I'm not suggesting either fat or carbs are the problem. It is the combination of the two, at certain levels, that can be dangerous.
Yes, you are saying combination of fat and carbs are dangerous. People are eliminating a lot of carbs and eating more fat and losing weight, plus dropping their blood sugars. So, what is the risk of fats here that you are indicating?It seems that most people are eating predominantly fats, and as far as is possible eliminating carbs. No?
most people are eating predominantly fats
Carbohydrate in any form turns to blood sugar. The fat content merely delays the inevitable regarding digestion.
Yes, you are saying combination of fat and carbs are dangerous. People are eliminating a lot of carbs and eating more fat and losing weight, plus dropping their blood sugars. So, what is the risk of fats here that you are indicating?
No. Low carb is not predominantly fats. Low carb is 130g or less a day of carbs, some fats like full fat milk, butter etc and protein. I do not eat high fat. I am not sure if maybe you are thinking of some who do keto? Even the keto eaters don't necessarily eat mainly fats.It seems that most people are eating predominantly fats, and as far as is possible eliminating carbs. No?
Only when required to.Doesn't protein also turn to sugar
Like rice, pasta, root veg, fruit, flour, potatoes? Or table sugar? None of which contain fat.the foods we view as carbs, that are predominantly made of fat
Like bread you mean?.. my own personal carb addiction.That and pasta little to no fat involved there.the foods we view as carbs
Doesn't protein also turn to sugar? And yes, carbs do turn to sugar. But when you say that fat "merely delays" the inevitable, the real ramifications of that are sugar being held up in the blood for a much longer time than it would be without the presence of the fat. And while I know that many here seem hyper-cautious of anything above a tiny spike in BS, I'm pretty sure that the most damaging aspect of elevated blood-sugar occurs when that elevation is prolonged, as it is when sugar and fat mix in the bloodstream.
No. Low carb is not predominantly fats. Low carb is 130g or less a day of carbs, some fats like full fat milk, butter etc and protein. I do not eat high fat. I am not sure if maybe you are thinking of some who do keto? Even the keto eaters don't necessarily eat mainly fats.
There are many, many types of low carbing going in the forum.
Like bread you mean?.. my own personal carb addiction.That and pasta little to no fat involved there.
In fact no.. I used to eat "dry" bread in surprisingly large quantities so I'm afraid your theory has a few more holes in it.Right! Bread and pasta are carbs...until you double the caloric load by adding butter and cheese.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?